Re: [Mailman-Users] Interesting Goings ons...

2006-11-01 Thread Mark Sapiro
Adam Morehead wrote: >Tested this morning: > >Nov 01 07:52:15 2006 (4952) ><[EMAIL PROTECTED] >n.edu> smtp for 1 recips, completed in 0.020 seconds >Nov 01 07:52:15 2006 (4952) ><[EMAIL PROTECTED] >n.edu> smtp for 1 recips, completed in 0.016 seconds >~ The above are sends of two messages (two

[Mailman-Users] Upgrade to mailman-2.1.9

2006-11-01 Thread stephen
Odhiambo Washington writes: > I have finally decided to upgrade from 2.1.5 -> 2.1.9, but I am being > hesitant because in 2.1.5, there was a patch to integrate spam > filtering into Mailman using SpamAssassin. First, look at doing the filtering in the MTA. Second, look at the new filtering

Re: [Mailman-Users] Upgrade to mailman-2.1.9

2006-11-01 Thread Brad Knowles
At 5:31 PM +0300 11/1/06, Odhiambo Washington wrote: > I have finally decided to upgrade from 2.1.5 -> 2.1.9, but I am being > hesitant because in 2.1.5, there was a patch to integrate spam > filtering into Mailman using SpamAssassin. For one thing, you should be filtering using tools like Spa

Re: [Mailman-Users] Upgrade to mailman-2.1.9

2006-11-01 Thread Patrick Bogen
On 11/1/06, Odhiambo Washington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have finally decided to upgrade from 2.1.5 -> 2.1.9, but I am being > hesitant because in 2.1.5, there was a patch to integrate spam > filtering into Mailman using SpamAssassin. > > What are my options once I go to 2.1.9? The best opti

[Mailman-Users] Upgrade to mailman-2.1.9

2006-11-01 Thread Odhiambo Washington
Hi, I have finally decided to upgrade from 2.1.5 -> 2.1.9, but I am being hesitant because in 2.1.5, there was a patch to integrate spam filtering into Mailman using SpamAssassin. What are my options once I go to 2.1.9? cheers - wash +--+--

Re: [Mailman-Users] reviving broken mailman ???

2006-11-01 Thread Patrick Bogen
On 11/1/06, Dr. Scott S. Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ok, I'll bide my time, I guess waiting for debian to come out and address > this apparent bug, relating to mailman and smtp-failure and debuglevel > reporting. I could wait a year, right, or it could be out today? If you're sure this is so

Re: [Mailman-Users] reviving broken mailman ???

2006-11-01 Thread Dr. Scott S. Jones
Mark: > Patrick has pretty much covered it. If you want another view, see > . > This is in the context of moving lists, but the directories and files > would be the same. > > However, I *think* you should be able to reins

Re: [Mailman-Users] List Doesn't Appear on Admin Page nor Listinfo Page

2006-11-01 Thread Patrick Bogen
On 11/1/06, Barry Finkel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The vm6mmtestlist1 list does not appear, and I do not know why. > The list has The list doesn't show up because its URL doesn't match mailman's current virtualhost URL. Try using fix_url on the list, and see if that fixes the problem. -- - Pa

[Mailman-Users] List Doesn't Appear on Admin Page nor Listinfo Page

2006-11-01 Thread Barry Finkel
I am testing Mailman on Ubuntu. I created the site list. Then I created a test list vm6mmtestlist1. I do not remember how I created it, but I think it was via the web. I had a problem with the Mailman configuration because I am using a virtual machine under Ubuntu, and I was confused as to the n

Re: [Mailman-Users] Interesting Goings ons...

2006-11-01 Thread Adam Morehead
Tested this morning: Nov 01 07:52:15 2006 (4952) <[EMAIL PROTECTED] n.edu> smtp for 1 recips, completed in 0.020 seconds Nov 01 07:52:15 2006 (4952) <[EMAIL PROTECTED] n.edu> smtp for 1 recips, completed in 0.016 seconds ~ Adam Mark Sapiro wrote: > Adam Morehead wrote: > > >>Both are correc