I am glad that the mailman developer community are aware of this feature.
\Tom
On 10/10/06, Brad Knowles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> At 10:49 AM +0900 10/11/06, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Mailman Developers: Is the web code set up so that so that admins
> > could fairly easily assemble
Ahh, this is very useful. I will try this setting and see how it works.
Thanks.
From: Mark Sapiro [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tue 10/10/2006 11:31 PM
To: Joyce, Wesley K.; mailman-users@python.org
Subject: Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman Problems - Serious
J
stupidmail4me wrote:
>Yes, the qrunner log shows the shutdown and startup
>from mailmanctl. I've also checked and ToArchive is in
>the pipeline (it's not commented out or changed in any
>conf file). This is why it's so odd.
The patch I posted causes ToArchive to write the 'ToArchive invoked
' me
At 10:49 AM +0900 10/11/06, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Mailman Developers: Is the web code set up so that so that admins
> could fairly easily assemble these UI widgets into a page that suits
> their usage?
Nope. It's all hard-coded.
>Or would that be a major refactoring?
Joyce, Wesley K. wrote:
>
>Yes I do, but am I correct in thinking the bounce processing isn't going to
>happen because postfix is killing the session from mailman before it completes?
I suspect you are correct in this. It depends on what SMTPDirect sees
in the return from the SMTP transaction, b
Yes I do, but am I correct in thinking the bounce processing isn't going to
happen because postfix is killing the session from mailman before it completes?
I am know considering settings smtpd_hard_error_limit to something like 5000.
Got clues of the postfix smtpd_hard_error_limit here
http://
Joyce, Wesley K. wrote:
>
>Adding this debuglevel immediatly revealed some useful information.
>
>Postfix is returning '421 mahi.fake.com Error: too many errors', apparently
>after to many failures in recipient. I recently purged lots of dead accounts
>that are obviously still listed in my maili
Yes, the qrunner log shows the shutdown and startup
from mailmanctl. I've also checked and ToArchive is in
the pipeline (it's not commented out or changed in any
conf file). This is why it's so odd.
--- Mark Sapiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> stupidmail4me wrote:
>
> >Nothing. It doesn't create
Adding this debuglevel immediatly revealed some useful information.
Postfix is returning '421 mahi.fake.com Error: too many errors', apparently
after to many failures in recipient. I recently purged lots of dead accounts
that are obviously still listed in my mailing lists. These seem to corre
Thanks for the prompt response. For further analysis, here are the versions I
am running.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# rpm -qa mailman
mailman-2.1.5-35.fc4
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# rpm -qa python
python-2.4.1-2
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]#
I will add the line
self.__conn.set_debuglevel(1)
restart mailman
a
Joyce, Wesley K. wrote:
>I am getting concerned about the stability of mailman. About 3 weeks ago I
>encountered the bug that required I change Bouncer.py line.
>time.strftime('%d-%b-%Y', day + (0,)*6)) to time.strftime('%d-%b-%Y', day +
>(0,0,0,0,1,0))).
>
>Since then, I have started encounte
Reply-To set to Mailman-Users.
Tom Kavanaugh writes:
> If there is a way to setup a A-Z index hortizontally above the List name -
> Description, it would be great.
>
> Any code hacks for this feature?
This feature is already in the Member List page. Since Mailman is
free software, reusing
I am getting concerned about the stability of mailman. About 3 weeks ago I
encountered the bug that required I change Bouncer.py line.
time.strftime('%d-%b-%Y', day + (0,)*6)) to time.strftime('%d-%b-%Y', day +
(0,0,0,0,1,0))).
Since then, I have started encountering errors like this
Oct 10 2
I have been using mailman at my workplace for almost a year now, and it is
working very well for us.
The number of lists are already over 50 and still growing.
One of the features I would like is to index list the mail list names.
Right now, the lists are sorted alphabetically and users have to sc
Christopher Adams wrote:
>
>One subscriber is receiving all list messages,
Then I take it that other users have no trouble posting.
>but when she posts to the
>'listname' list, she gets this:
>
>Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients.
>
> Subject: MemberClicks
>
Paul Carter wrote:
>
>I'm an administrator for a few small mailman lists. Recently, some
>messages in our list have gotten stuck in the moderator phase. I keep
>getting messages about messages that require moderator approval, but
>when any of hte moderators or admins goes to evaluate the messages
stupidmail4me wrote:
>Nothing. It doesn't create any log and there's no
>appropriate entries in any log.
If you applied the patch and then restarted Mailman and you get no
'debug' log with any messages, either the ToArchive handler is not in
the pipeline, or you're not looking in the right direc
I am running the current version of Posfix with the current version of
Mailman. This may actually be a Postfix question, but I have queried
the postfix-users lis and I think they are weary of hearing this
question.
One subscriber is receiving all list messages, but when she posts to the
'listname
Nothing. It doesn't create any log and there's no
appropriate entries in any log.
I've checked the headers for the delivered messages
and there's no x-archive headers (they're not being
myteriously added).
--- Mark Sapiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> stupidmail4me wrote:
>
> >It is set to Yes.
Hello again,
On Tue, 10 Oct 2006, Patrick Bogen wrote:
> You need to remove whatever filter it is you used; either
> accept_this_nonmember, or, if that email address is part of the list,
> find it in the membership administration interface and check its
> 'moderated' bit.
Thank you very much. I
On 10/10/06, Zbigniew Szalbot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> How can I now force mailman to always require admin's approval if a
> message comes from an address already added to the aproval filter?
You need to remove whatever filter it is you used; either
accept_this_nonmember, or, if that email add
stupidmail4me wrote:
>It is set to Yes.
>
>--- Mark Sapiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Is the list's archive attribute set to Yes?
>> (Archiving Options in the
>> web admin interface)
Apply the attached patch to your mailman installation, restart Mailman,
post a message to the list and repor
22 matches
Mail list logo
