-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sep 27, 2006, at 8:29 PM, Tokio Kikuchi wrote:
>> In summary my preferences would be:
>>
>> Mailman 2.1.x supported on Python 2.3, 2.4, and 2.5. Drop support
>> for Python 2.1 and 2.2. We've done this accidentally in Mailman
>> 2.1.9, so let's ma
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sep 27, 2006, at 9:32 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Mailman 2.1.x supported on Python 2.3, 2.4, and 2.5. Drop support
>> for Python 2.1 and 2.2. We've done this accidentally in Mailman
>> 2.1.9, so let's make it official.
>
> Would it be poss
Patrick Bogen writes:
> On 9/27/06, Barry Finkel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > the source(s) of these differences. Is there 2.1.8 code that has not
> > been ported to the Ubuntu 2.1.5-9?
> I don't know. This is up to the Ubuntu folk. *usually* the -9 means
> there have been 9 security patch
Barry Warsaw writes:
> Mailman 2.2 supported on Python 2.4 and 2.5.
+1.
> Mailman 2.1.x supported on Python 2.3, 2.4, and 2.5. Drop support
> for Python 2.1 and 2.2. We've done this accidentally in Mailman
> 2.1.9, so let's make it official.
Would it be possible to maintain a rough li
Patrick Bogen wrote:
>On 9/25/06, Jeremy Leonard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Does Mailman support using MySQL, LDAP or another SQL server for a backend?
>
>I believe there's a third-party patch/addon to use MySQL for storing
>membership information, although I think list configurations (and
>alm
> In summary my preferences would be:
>
> Mailman 2.1.x supported on Python 2.3, 2.4, and 2.5. Drop support
> for Python 2.1 and 2.2. We've done this accidentally in Mailman
> 2.1.9, so let's make it official.
>
> Mailman 2.2 supported on Python 2.4 and 2.5.
+1
--
Tokio Kikuchi, [EMAIL P
Franky St. Pierre wrote:
>
>I am getting these errors when I
>try bin/check_perms -f (-bash: bin/check_perms: @PYTHON@: bad
>interpreter: No such file or directory)
This means one of two things. Either something went terribly wrong with
the configure, make install process or you are running bin/c
Bob Bergey wrote:
>Can Google Free Search be set up to use for searches of my Mailman
>archives? How would I go about it? I searched the list archives here
>but didn't find anything on the topic.
>
>Also, the list in question is a list where archives are set up to be
>viewable only by current list
On 9/27/06, Bob Bergey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Can Google Free Search be set up to use for searches of my Mailman
> archives? How would I go about it? I searched the list archives here
> but didn't find anything on the topic.
>
> Also, the list in question is a list where archives are set up t
Can Google Free Search be set up to use for searches of my Mailman
archives? How would I go about it? I searched the list archives here
but didn't find anything on the topic.
Also, the list in question is a list where archives are set up to be
viewable only by current list members.
Bob
---
Oh nevermind, I am on crack. This wouldn't work.
You'd still have to use some intermediate filter to decide what was a reply
and what was an original.
On 9/27/06, Elizabeth Schwartz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I would think you could make it work "outside the system" by setting
> reply-to-poste
On Wed, 2006-09-27 at 15:29 -0400, Larry Johnson wrote:
> I asked a similar question to this earlier (involving the g'zipped files
> in the archives). I inherited administration of a mailman system (I'm a
> solaris sysadmin) and have been trying to figure out the role of the
> various files in the
I would think you could make it work "outside the system" by setting
reply-to-poster, then changing the alias for the list to go both to the list
processing command, and to a dummy-user . Then pipe the dummy user's mail
into something that is web-accessible. You could use another mailman list,
and
On 9/27/06, Dragon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The mbox files are where the messages used to build the archive HTML
> files reside.
>
> If you remove them or edit them, you would not be able to rebuild
> your archives the way they are if you ever had a need to do so.
And, perhaps more importantl
Larry Johnson wrote:
>What is the role of the *.mbox files in the archives? What would the
>effect be of removing one? Of editing one (and removing older
>messages)? They seem to grow continually. What is best practice for
>managing them?
End original message. -
I asked a similar question to this earlier (involving the g'zipped files
in the archives). I inherited administration of a mailman system (I'm a
solaris sysadmin) and have been trying to figure out the role of the
various files in the archives, so that I know what I can clean out for
space saving
At 11:56 AM -0400 9/27/06, Barry Warsaw wrote:
> You've made this point before and each time you do, I remember
> that it's a good one. :) Brad, would you mind adding this to
> the Mailman 2.2 wiki page?
Will do.
> I think it's a worthy feature to add.
Thanks!
At 10:50 AM -0500 9/27/06, Barry Finkel wrote:
> Is there 2.1.8 code that has not
> been ported to the Ubuntu 2.1.5-9?
Dunno. You need to ask the people who created the binary package you're using.
>Is there code that Ubun
At 7:57 AM -0700 9/27/06, Mark Sapiro wrote:
> This works fine for outgoing mail. Incoming mail is trickier. You have
> to use something like fetchmail or some other process to get the mail
> from the incoming MTA to mailman (Maybe NFS can be used, but I don't
> offhand know if anyone has done
On 9/27/06, Barry Finkel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> the source(s) of these differences. Is there 2.1.8 code that has not
> been ported to the Ubuntu 2.1.5-9?
I don't know. This is up to the Ubuntu folk. *usually* the -9 means
there have been 9 security patches to that version. How up to date
thi
Patrick Bogen said the following on 2006/09/27 05:03 PM:
> It might be worth mentioning that, as the system administrator, some
> low-impact spam filtering might be in order, to stop these messages
> from even reaching Mailman.
Exim blacklists (regularly updated) along with spamassassin and ACLs a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sep 26, 2006, at 9:07 PM, Brad Knowles wrote:
> But you're still using a single directory as an on-disk queue, and
> that single directory has to be completely locked, operated on, and
> then unlocked every single time you want to create a new
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I'm including mailman-developers on this message, because I want to
discuss the issue of which Python versions to support.
On Sep 27, 2006, at 11:04 AM, Stubbs Jeff wrote:
> Got a question. I picked up another Mac, so I'm going to rebuild my
> list
Patrick Bogen replied to some posting:
>(Also, Ubuntu should have a fairly recent version of Mailman in its
>repositories. Are you using that, or did you download the source?)
I have installed mailman_2.1.5-9ubuntu4.1 for testing. I installed via
apt-get install mailman
As I was not sure h
Elizabeth Schwartz wrote:
>I checked in last night and mailman was hung
>again, but this time I saw that the OutgoingRunner process was missing, and
>there are errors in the error log:
The 'error' log or the 'qrunner' log?
>Sep 23 08:10:17 2006 (2180) Master qrunner detected subprocess exit
>(
Greetings List,
Got a question. I picked up another Mac, so I'm going to rebuild my
list server from scratch, using Postfix 2.3.3 and Mailman 2.1.9. The
default python install supplied by Apple is version 2.3.5. Last week
or so , I noticed the version 2.4.3 was available from the Python
we
On 9/27/06, Bretton Vine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> A question that's come up from list administrators is the issue of the daily
> administrative mail they get. In situations where the list is really low
> volume (yet somehow the listname finds itself in a spam database) the list
> owner is spend
On 9/25/06, Jeremy Leonard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Does Mailman support using MySQL, LDAP or another SQL server for a backend?
I believe there's a third-party patch/addon to use MySQL for storing
membership information, although I think list configurations (and
almost certainly archives) are
Brad Knowles wrote:
>At 2:29 PM -0600 9/26/06, Brandon Slaten wrote:
>
>> It is my
>> understanding that Mailman needs to be installed on the same host that
>> is running the mail server. Is this correct?
>
>It is a typical configuration, bu
On 9/27/06, Franky St. Pierre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I used no arguments for the installation. I am not sure what went wrong...
This might be your problem. I haven't installed from source,
personally, but as I recall, you have to give configure several
parameters, such as where files go, etc
- Original Message ---
Subject: [Mailman-Users] obscuring list addresses on the listinfo page
From: Bretton Vine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 10:03:27 +0200
To: mailman-users@python.org
>Another question (and this may be dumb, advance apologies) but how
Bretton Vine worte:
>Is it possible to
>make some lists send out admin requests only one a week as opposed to daily?
The notices are sent by cron/checkdbs which is run via a crontab for
the mailman user. You can easily change the frequency of this for all
lists just by altering the crontab.
To
Does Mailman support using MySQL, LDAP or another SQL server for a backend?
--
Mailman-Users mailing list
Mailman-Users@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py
Searchab
Another question (and this may be dumb, advance apologies) but how can one
obscure the list addresses on the
http://lists.domain.net/mailman/listinfo/listname
page?
+
| Using listname
| To post a message to all the list members, send e
A question that's come up from list administrators is the issue of the daily
administrative mail they get. In situations where the list is really low
volume (yet somehow the listname finds itself in a spam database) the list
owner is spending X minutes a day discarding these mails while the list
it
35 matches
Mail list logo
