Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman and Sendmail debugging questions

2006-06-09 Thread Daniel, Barry K.
I've got the basic mailing list functionality working now!!! I have been silly enough to look over a typo in my mm_cfg.py file for a couple of days now (SMTP_HOST, not SMPT_HOST). I still need to turn mm-handler back on but I do not think that will be too hard. Here is a description of how I

Re: [Mailman-Users] Members list settings

2006-06-09 Thread Eli Tuber
I actually like the idea that the user can control the breakdown size and the amount of members that are listed per page. Personally as long as the list is sorted finding the users should not be very hard on a moderate size list. This is my first time posting on this users group. What would it tak

Re: [Mailman-Users] Members list settings

2006-06-09 Thread Todd Zullinger
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Mark Sapiro wrote: > I prefer however to think in terms of the RFEs on this which ask for > various things from simply exposing the parameter in the web > interface to providing a radio button selection (e.g. 20, 50, 100, > all) on the pages to paginat

Re: [Mailman-Users] Members list settings

2006-06-09 Thread Carl Zwanzig
In a flurry of recycled electrons, Mark Sapiro wrote: > I prefer however to think in terms of the RFEs on this which ask for > various things from simply exposing the parameter in the web interface > to providing a radio button selection (e.g. 20, 50, 100, all) on the > pages to paginating without

Re: [Mailman-Users] Problems with To Header

2006-06-09 Thread Brad Knowles
At 6:48 PM -0500 2006-06-09, Joseph Perrie wrote: > However, I still couldn't see why Sendmail would force the > To-header back to the canonical name when Mailman was setting it correctly. > Eventually, I happened across this email ( > http://mail.python.org/pipermail/mailman-develope

Re: [Mailman-Users] Members list settings

2006-06-09 Thread Mark Sapiro
John W. Baxter wrote: > >I always worry about changing default values, but in this case the world has >changed. Is 25 still the right default in this age when few list >owner/admin folks are on dialup? Just one more thing to contemplate. Actually, the distributed default is 30, but your point i

Re: [Mailman-Users] Problems with To Header

2006-06-09 Thread Joseph Perrie
All of the emails sent by our server out to the mailing lists were using the host name instead of the DNS A record for the Mailman VirtualHost. I tried for days to fix this and eventually got the feeling that it was DNS related. However, I still couldn't see why Sendmail would force the To-header

[Mailman-Users] Problems with To Header

2006-06-09 Thread Joseph Perrie
DEFAULT_EMAIL_HOST is set to thecheat.example.com while the hostname of my machine is strongbad.example.com. All emails come from strongbad. I'm running sendmail. Masquerade and Masquerade_as are configured. I've tried everything. All of the FAQ suggestions, the mailing list, usenet, and the

Re: [Mailman-Users] Members list settings

2006-06-09 Thread John W. Baxter
On 6/8/06 6:50 PM, "Mark Sapiro" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Eli Tuber" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2006 21:38:08 -0400 > To: mailman-users@python.org > >> Is there a way to not change over to alphabetical view of the members list >> once it has over N number of users? I have

Re: [Mailman-Users] List owner not getting bounce notifications

2006-06-09 Thread Mark Sapiro
KENNEY, William P. (Info. Tech. Services) wrote: > >I am the administrator of our mailman list server and after creating a >new list for a list owner, it was noted that the list owner is not >receiving bounce notifications. I see mail errors as root indicating the >mail recipient is invalid for the

[Mailman-Users] List owner not getting bounce notifications

2006-06-09 Thread KENNEY, William P. (Info. Tech. Services)
Hello, I am the administrator of our mailman list server and after creating a new list for a list owner, it was noted that the list owner is not receiving bounce notifications. I see mail errors as root indicating the mail recipient is invalid for the delivery URL. What should I, and/or the list

Re: [Mailman-Users] cleaning up dead addresses

2006-06-09 Thread Patrick Bogen
On 6/8/06, Mark Sapiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >I was reviewing one of my lists today and recognize several email addresses > >for recipients who are long since moved, and whose addresses are likely > >dead. > > > >How does Mailman manage these? > In accord with the settings on the list admin