Re: [Mailman-Users] help request: new 1300 member list results inmostly bounces

Nathan wrote: > >Any advice as to why this is happening? I'm assuming the problem is NOT >with mailman itself, but possibly with her webhost (maybe flagged as a >spammer by other hosts?). That's one possibility. >For what it's worth, one other address to >which the email did get through was

Re: [Mailman-Users] Umbrella lists

Lori Christensen wrote: >None of the sub-lists that are members receive their email from umbrella >list. > >Example: umbrella list name- campusfac-l > >Membership for this list is >Hum-l >Soc-l >Sci-l > >(these all have campusfac-l under recipient filter- Alias names >(regexps) which qualify as ex

[Mailman-Users] help request: new 1300 member list results in mostly bounces

Hello. I'm new to mailman. I've used it to setup an announce-only list for a friend who has over 1300 addresses. Up to this point, she's been simply sending to her entire AOL address book (as this user/account is setup specifically for people who want to receive announcements about her studio)

Re: [Mailman-Users] Change the confirmtion request text and automatedinvitations

Ulf Markwardt wrote: >I would like to automatically invite every new user of our computing center to >our mailing list. But I need an adapted text for the invitation/confirmation >request. This is, to decrease the possibility that this e-Mail might be >considered an spam by the receiver. > >* I

Re: [Mailman-Users] i need to pass the emai adresses in a mailman listto an excel file

negocios_online wrote: >in order to check what servers are used in the mail adresses. Is there any >way to do that? See . -- Mark Sapiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, Californ

Re: [Mailman-Users] Problem with config.pck

Markus Schanovsky wrote: > >Now my question: >Who is setting the file-permissions back? Every time Mailman saves the list, it saves it to a new, temporary config.pck.. file with permissions 0660. Then it removes the config.pck.last, renames the config.pck to config.pck.last and finally renames the

[Mailman-Users] i need to pass the emai adresses in a mailman list to an excel file

in order to check what servers are used in the mail adresses. Is there any way to do that? -- Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users Mailman FAQ: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw

Re: [Mailman-Users] Announce-list only.

Sorry, about the reply issue. Usually when I click on reply the address that appears is the list... So I didn't check it. thanks anyway... On 5/19/06, Patrick Bogen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > ASP has several different mechanisms for sending EMail, so I still > can't give a definite answer. Th

Re: [Mailman-Users] Everything is an attachment

>> I think you're misinterpreting that post. I think she is saying her >> problem was caused by a footer which consisted of only a blank line >> and when she removed the footer completely, the problem went away. >That's not hard for me to believe (that I'm misinterpretting, I mean). Maybe the foo

[Mailman-Users] Problem with config.pck

Hello! I am very sorry to ask for help, but I run into a big problem with mailman 2.18. Everytime I try to call an admin-pages of mailman or a user calls his personal admittance to his mailman-subscription I get the following error-message: == Bug in Mailman version 2.1.8 We're

Re: [Mailman-Users] Announce-list only.

ASP has several different mechanisms for sending EMail, so I still can't give a definite answer. That said, this is pretty far outside the scope of the mailman-users list. Also, please try to post replies to the list, also, since that frees me from having to manually add the CC and top-post. - Pa

Re: [Mailman-Users] PGP keys causing problems

Mark Sapiro wrote: > >Regarding the original problem of the message body and attached patch >not being in the archive, I have done some testing with the latest >Scrubber, and it works properly with all the test messages Todd sent me. > >I note that the annotation "Skipped content of type multipar

Re: [Mailman-Users] Announce-list only.

This depends on what language your internal application is written in, and whether or not you have access to the source code. On 5/19/06, Fabiano Breves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Patrick, > > Ok. Sorry about my next question. :-) > > How can I do that? I'm not getting the header part. The hea

Re: [Mailman-Users] PGP keys causing problems

Jeff DeReus wrote: > It seems that adding the filter_types has one effect. When the list > subscribers get a message that has been PGP signed, the signature is > no longer valid. I assume here that content filtering is On. There is not much Mailman can do in these cases. I'm not sure what the s

Re: [Mailman-Users] disappearing CC lines

Mark Sapiro wrote: > >I'm going to try to find out if anyone remembers why it is this way in >the first place, and if it should be continued. The log message associated with the change says: process(): If a member has enabled their DontReceiveDuplicates option, we'll also strip their addresses

Re: [Mailman-Users] Umbrella lists

John Adamski wrote: > >After more research it looks like the issue is between our exchange >server and mailman. Exchange is holding all emails in a queue and >getting error 'The remover server did not respond to a connection >attempt.' > >So far I have not found out why exchange can't connect or

Re: [Mailman-Users] disappearing CC lines

Patrick Bogen wrote: >On 5/19/06, Imre Gergely <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> but the other members of the list do get the mail. they should see in the Cc: >> that one person, who didn't get it because of above condition. or am i wrong >> here? >> >I don't know about 'should,' but this is NOT what

Re: [Mailman-Users] disappearing CC lines

Imre Gergely wrote: > >let me get this straight. when somebody who is on the list, is also in the CC: >of the message, it wont get the mail from the list, only from the original >poster, right? that's what this DontReceiveDupes does. Correct. >but the other members of the list do get the mail.

Re: [Mailman-Users] disappearing CC lines

On 5/19/06, Imre Gergely <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > but the other members of the list do get the mail. they should see in the Cc: > that one person, who didn't get it because of above condition. or am i wrong > here? > I don't know about 'should,' but this is NOT what happens. As Mark explains,