james edwards wrote:
>
>A level 0 backup raan last night, so I can get the files from there.
Good. :-)
>Is there anything of use here:
>
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] jid]# /usr/lib/mailman/bin/dumpdb -p config.pck.last
>[- start pickle file -]
>[- end pickle file -]
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] ji
Mark,
Thanks for your help. Answers inline.
> Is it only gate_news that gets this error? Are there errors like this
> in the error log from other processes. What happens if you go to the
> web listinfo overview for example. Does it get the same error?
Yep & only for one list.
If everything t
Rick G wrote:
>Guess what? Just found the request.db file - 323612 bytes.
This represents a huge number of held requests for the admindb page
which explains the MemoryError.
You initially said you got rid of the held messages. Do you mean you
deleted the data/heldmsg-clinic-.pck files? If
james edwards wrote:
>After my server panicked and rebooted itself, when this cron runs:
> /usr/lib/mailman/cron/gate_new I get this error message:
>
>Traceback (most recent call last):
> File "/usr/lib/mailman/cron/gate_news", line 284, in ?
>main()
> File "/usr/lib/mailman/cron/gate_news
Guess what? Just found the request.db file - 323612 bytes.
And the etc/alias reads as follows for Clinic
clinic-admin:"|/usr/local/mailman/mail/wrapper mailowner clinic"
clinic-request: "|/usr/local/mailman/mail/wrapper mailcmd clinic"
clinic-owner:"clinic-admin"
After my server panicked and rebooted itself, when this cron runs:
/usr/lib/mailman/cron/gate_new I get this error message:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/lib/mailman/cron/gate_news", line 284, in ?
main()
File "/usr/lib/mailman/cron/gate_news", line 264, in main
proc
Jewel wrote:
>
>I went into a few lists and see that the email is
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] I don't know where this [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>is coming from. I am assuming this is some default setting within
>Mailman or somewhere esle which I need to locate and change.
There are no default addresses that m
Rick G wrote:
>Okay - I know you're trying to help, I didn't mean to imply otherwise. :)
>Please trust that your assistance is greatly appreciated.
And I didn't mean that I thought you didn't know I was trying to help.
I was only trying to explain why I was finding it difficult.
>Regrettably
I went into a few lists and see that the email is
[EMAIL PROTECTED] I don't know where this [EMAIL PROTECTED]
is coming from. I am assuming this is some default setting within
Mailman or somewhere esle which I need to locate and change. I never
created the account manually. I upgraded Mailm
Okay - I know you're trying to help, I didn't mean to imply otherwise. :)
Please trust that your assistance is greatly appreciated.
Regrettably I missed the part about request.db (that doesn't seem to exist)
and pending.pck (which is bytes).
I do have access to many of the config files for
Jewel wrote:
>The old server had the email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] as the list
>administator. But now email is trying to deliver to
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] How can this be corrected?
Change it on the lists admin web interface General Options page.
--
Mark Sapiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> The highwa
Rick G wrote:
>Well, I can't answer that - it runs on a VPS from Verio. The only access I
>have is to mailman which was installed from their service as a script
>command in a telnet session almost 3 years ago.
In an earlier post, you said that you read the FAQ I pointed you to,
and your MemoryE
The old server had the email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] as the list
administator. But now email is trying to deliver to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] How can this be corrected?
Jewel wrote:
>I just replaced an old mailman server last night and was sent an email
>saying that mail is bouncing. What could be ca
I just replaced an old mailman server last night and was sent an email
saying that mail is bouncing. What could be causing this?
Subject:
Uncaught bounce notification
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date:
Tue, 21 Mar 2006 10:21:32 -0600
To:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
The attached message was received as a bou
On Tue, 21 Mar 2006 13:26:43 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>Greetings,
>
>I hope that I am not asking something that has been discussed
>extensively before, but I couldn't find the answer on those questions
>anywhere.
>
>1. Is there a way to delete all the members from the mailing list with
>one
Well, I can't answer that - it runs on a VPS from Verio. The only access I
have is to mailman which was installed from their service as a script
command in a telnet session almost 3 years ago.
Of course, Verio is sticking with their standard tech support concept -
"They do not provide technical s
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>1. Is there a way to delete all the members from the mailing list with
>one simple command, while maintaining the list and other configurations?
If you have command line access,
bin/remove_members --all listname
If not, you need a list of the members to input to the
Greetings,
I hope that I am not asking something that has been discussed
extensively before, but I couldn't find the answer on those questions
anywhere.
1. Is there a way to delete all the members from the mailing list with
one simple command, while maintaining the list and other configurations?
>Mailman is running on a FreeBSD server.
I meant is this installed from source, a package, what package, any
local mods, why is it (or was it on Mar 20 11:20:43 2006) apparently
running a Mailman 2.0.x mailowner script that doesn't exist in 2.1.x
when it identifies itself as 2.1.4?
--
Mark Sapir
Mailman is running on a FreeBSD server.
Rick Grams
-Original Message-
From: Mark Sapiro [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 21, 2006 11:35 AM
To: Rick G; mailman-users@python.org
Subject: RE: [Mailman-Users] Hit a bug - only on this list - Memory does not
appear to be the iss
Rick G wrote:
>
>This was a standard entry in the error log:
>Mar 20 11:20:43 2006 post(89049): Traceback (most recent call last):
>post(89049): File "/usr/local/mailman/scripts/mailowner", line 79, in ?
>post(89049): main()
>post(89049): File "/usr/local/mailman/scripts/mailowner", line 5
Further log review for the list:
This was a standard entry in the error log:
Mar 20 11:20:43 2006 post(89049): Traceback (most recent call last):
post(89049): File "/usr/local/mailman/scripts/mailowner", line 79, in ?
post(89049): main()
post(89049): File "/usr/local/mailman/scripts/mailo
Rick G wrote:
>We did look for that - it does not exist in this situation. Also, other
>mailman lists are not having this problem. Only this particular list when
>we click on "Tend to pending moderator requests."
I was guessing this was because there were a large number of requests
in this cas
We did look for that - it does not exist in this situation. Also, other
mailman lists are not having this problem. Only this particular list when
we click on "Tend to pending moderator requests."
I think I have manually removed all of the messages for this list as well.
None of the messages were
Rick G wrote:
>
>Traceback (most recent call last):
> File "/usr/local/mailman/scripts/driver", line 87, in run_main
>main()
> File "/usr/local/mailman/Mailman/Cgi/admindb.py", line 236, in main
>print doc.Format()
> File "/usr/local/mailman/Mailman/htmlformat.py", line 331, in Format
>
Jewel wrote:
>I keep receiving this error and cannot determine why. Can someone help me?
>
>Traceback (most recent call last):
> File "/usr/local/mailman/bin/qrunner", line 270, in ?
>main()
> File "/usr/local/mailman/bin/qrunner", line 230, in main
>qrunner.run()
> File "/usr/local/ma
Advise please.
Bug in Mailman version 2.1.4
We're sorry, we hit a bug!
If you would like to help us identify the problem, please email a copy of
this page to the webmaster for this site with a description of what
happened. Thanks!
Traceback:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/us
I keep receiving this error and cannot determine why. Can someone help me?
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/local/mailman/bin/qrunner", line 270, in ?
main()
File "/usr/local/mailman/bin/qrunner", line 230, in main
qrunner.run()
File "/usr/local/mailman/Mailman/Queue/Ru
Dave Filchak wrote:
>However, one thing that still is. I
>have configured the reply to in a way that I thought that the end user
>would see a reply-to address in the headers that was not a reply to the
>list. I have set the following:
>
>Hide the sender of a message, replacing it with the list add
29 matches
Mail list logo
