Elvis Fernandes wrote:
>
>On checking the apache/error_log, I see the following message that has some
>"(8)Exec format error:"
>
>[Mon Mar 06 16:40:09 2006] [error] [client 143.103.41.10] File does not
>exist: /disk1/mailman/favicon.ico
Above is not a problem.
>[Mon Mar 06 16:40:10 2006] [error] [
At 5:58 PM -0700 2006-03-06, Jonathan Larsen wrote:
> It does do it on incoming mail but only after it's went to mailman and then
> is going back to the MTA for final delivery. So basically right before it
> hits the user.
Which is absolutely bass-ackwards. Do the check in the MTA
be
Dr. Scott S. Jones wrote:
>I operate a mailing list to issues updates and information to my patients.
>The list is fully moderated, disallowing anyone to post without review.
>
>Occasionally, I get some patients who respond back to something I send, and
>I want to post their response, but I'd lik
I operate a mailing list to issues updates and information to my patients.
The list is fully moderated, disallowing anyone to post without review.
Occasionally, I get some patients who respond back to something I send, and
I want to post their response, but I'd like to have it post with the
ident
Jonathan Larsen wrote:
>It does do it on incoming mail but only after it's went to mailman and then
>is going back to the MTA for final delivery. So basically right before it
>hits the user.
I don't want to argue the semantics with you, but whatever you want to
call it, the MTA should be applying
It does do it on incoming mail but only after it's went to mailman and then
is going back to the MTA for final delivery. So basically right before it
hits the user.
-Original Message-
From: Mark Sapiro [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 06, 2006 3:56 PM
To: Jonathan Larsen; mai
Hi Mark,
> My best guess here is that [EMAIL PROTECTED] is a member
of the [EMAIL PROTECTED] list.
Yes, that was correct. And hence the mails were getting into a bounce loop.
I have removed [EMAIL PROTECTED] from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I was s stupid to do it in the first place, but this was a gr
Hello,
I am trying to integrate the namazu search with mailman archives.
I am able to get namzu list out the messages containg the search string.
But, when I click on the message, it just come back with the error:
Internal Server Error
The server encountered an internal error or misconfiguratio
At 3:57 PM -0700 2006-03-06, Jonathan Larsen wrote:
> Besides the integration. Is there another way to solve this problem?
Integrate it into the MTA. See FAQ 6.12 for one example.
--
Brad Knowles, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little
t
Jonathan Larsen wrote:
> Besides the integration. Is there another way to solve this problem?
>
SpamAssassin scan the incoming mail before Mailman gets it's grubby paws on
it.
I actually do both.
LER
--
Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler
Phone: +1 512-248-2683
Besides the integration. Is there another way to solve this problem?
-Original Message-
From: Larry Rosenman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 06, 2006 3:54 PM
To: 'Jonathan Larsen'; mailman-users@python.org
Subject: RE: [Mailman-Users] Spam assassin with mailman
Jonathan La
Jonathan Larsen wrote:
>The issue we're having is that Mail comes in through our mail server.
>Shoots to Mailman. Mailman then finds the list, sends the mail back to the
>mail server and only then does the mail get hit by spam assassin.
Why is your MTA doing spam detection on outgoing mail and n
Jonathan Larsen wrote:
> The issue we're having is that Mail comes in through our mail server.
> Shoots to Mailman. Mailman then finds the list, sends the mail back
> to the
> mail server and only then does the mail get hit by spam assassin. If
> the
> email was sent as a blacklisted spam, once
Axel Beckert - ecos gmbh wrote:
>
>> When I try to view the qfiles in my in out or retry directories I get an
>> error like the following:
>>
>> /usr/local/mailman/bin/show_qfiles qfiles/in/*.pck
>> >
>> qfiles/in/1109557589.84778+7a750d59fd76a54b51168a615ef23e74f4088be9.pck
The issue we're having is that Mail comes in through our mail server.
Shoots to Mailman. Mailman then finds the list, sends the mail back to the
mail server and only then does the mail get hit by spam assassin. If the
email was sent as a blacklisted spam, once it hits mailman it doesn't appear
th
Hi!
I know, this reply comes about one year too late ;-) but nevertheless,
here's the solution (and a bug report):
> When I try to view the qfiles in my in out or retry directories I get an
> error like the following:
>
> /usr/local/mailman/bin/show_qfiles qfiles/in/*.pck
>
Stephen,
> Dave> AOL creates a specialized, rather expensive process that it
> Dave> provides for free, to ensure delivery of a class of mail.
>
> [If you want to know why Brad asks if you're an "intentional shill for
> the advertising industry," there you have it. The purpose of the
> "
Andrew Steele wrote:
>
>All was well last Friday, but by today, Monday, I find the following
>symptoms:
>
>1. No messages sent to any list are distributed.
>
>2. New lists can be created from within the linux shell and appear to be
>correctly configured.
Can you access their listinfo and adm
We have experienced a suddne problem with our Mailman installation.
All was well last Friday, but by today, Monday, I find the following
symptoms:
1. No messages sent to any list are distributed.
2. New lists can be created from within the linux shell and appear to be
correctly configured.
> "Dave" == Dave Crocker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> You understand that and I understand that, but I don't think
>> it's easy to grasp from the pages whose URLs you posted. What
>> _is_ easy to grasp is that bulk emailers who have been getting
>> a certain level of QoS for
20 matches
Mail list logo
