Re: [Mailman-Users] Moderator permissions or rights

2006-02-18 Thread Mark Sapiro
Allan Hansen wrote: >I have this same requirement. I was thinking of writing some CGI >scripts that take commands from the moderator and then apply them >to the lists via the mailman command line interface. > >My own reason for this is that some moderators are handling many >lists, and going into

Re: [Mailman-Users] excessive bounces bug

2006-02-18 Thread Mark Sapiro
Travis Derouin wrote: > >Cool, what's the best way of doing this? Your earlier, rapid response with the number of bouncing members and their domains leads me to believe you got that info with bin/list_members, so here's a withlist script to do it. --cut here---

Re: [Mailman-Users] excessive bounces bug

2006-02-18 Thread Travis Derouin
> >By disabling bounce processing, will this ignore the previous > >disabling of addresses, since the recipients haven't received the > >remaining 3 reminders (sounds like a tongue twister)? > > > No. Once a member is disabled by bounce, the proces is taken over by > the cron/disabled job which se

Re: [Mailman-Users] Moderator permissions or rights

2006-02-18 Thread Allan Hansen
I have this same requirement. I was thinking of writing some CGI scripts that take commands from the moderator and then apply them to the lists via the mailman command line interface. My own reason for this is that some moderators are handling many lists, and going into each one with a password i

Re: [Mailman-Users] Goodmail spells doom for mailing lists?

2006-02-18 Thread Brad Knowles
At 1:10 PM -0500 2006-02-17, Jonathan Dill wrote: > Has anyone talked about the changes planned by AOL, Yahoo! etc. to > require "certification" via Goodmail or just be blocked? We've discussed this subject on this list before. The EFF has published some good stuff, too. But unless y

Re: [Mailman-Users] excessive bounces bug

2006-02-18 Thread Mark Sapiro
Travis Derouin wrote: > >I am the list owner, but there have been at least 2 non-list owner >addresses that have also received this same message, when their >addresses shouldn't have been disabled. Bounce processing was >enabled, bounce_notify_owner_on_disable is yes. So did you receive the own

Re: [Mailman-Users] excessive bounces bug

2006-02-18 Thread Travis Derouin
Hi Mark, Thanks for your reply! On 2/18/06, Mark Sapiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Travis Derouin wrote: > > > >I run a mailing list for a daily how-to newsletter for eHow.com. > >Today, at least a few of us subscribed to the list, including myself, > >received a false warning: > > > >"Your mem

Re: [Mailman-Users] excessive bounces bug

2006-02-18 Thread Mark Sapiro
Travis Derouin wrote: > >I run a mailing list for a daily how-to newsletter for eHow.com. >Today, at least a few of us subscribed to the list, including myself, >received a false warning: > >"Your membership in the mailing list eHow has been disabled due to >excessive bounces The last bounce receiv

[Mailman-Users] excessive bounces bug

2006-02-18 Thread Travis Derouin
Hi, I run a mailing list for a daily how-to newsletter for eHow.com. Today, at least a few of us subscribed to the list, including myself, received a false warning: "Your membership in the mailing list eHow has been disabled due to excessive bounces The last bounce received from you was dated 18-

Re: [Mailman-Users] "disable_dns_lookups = yes" is a very bad idea

2006-02-18 Thread Ralf Hildebrandt
* Jonathan Dill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Speaking ripe from experience, the Mailman FAQ suggests turning on > "disable_dns_lookups = yes" to improve the performance of Postfix with > Mailman, which kind of makes sense. BUT in Postfix, this disables all > MX lookups. So, unless you are going indi

Re: [Mailman-Users] Goodmail spells doom for mailing lists?

2006-02-18 Thread Christopher X. Candreva
On Fri, 17 Feb 2006, Jonathan Dill wrote: > Has anyone talked about the changes planned by AOL, Yahoo! etc. to > require "certification" via Goodmail or just be blocked? > > http://www.clickz.com/news/article.php/3581301 It's been beaten to death -- at this point I can't recall if here or on o

[Mailman-Users] Goodmail spells doom for mailing lists?

2006-02-18 Thread Jonathan Dill
Has anyone talked about the changes planned by AOL, Yahoo! etc. to require "certification" via Goodmail or just be blocked? http://www.clickz.com/news/article.php/3581301 http://www.goodmailsystems.com/ What will happen to a mailing list such as this one? Will AOL and Yahoo! users just be out

Re: [Mailman-Users] "disable_dns_lookups = yes" is a very bad idea

2006-02-18 Thread Brad Knowles
At 12:12 PM +0100 2006-02-18, Brad Knowles wrote: > Take another look at those entries. We're talking about running > a second instance of postfix, on another port, with a special > configuration (disabling all anti-virus/anti-spam stuff, all DNS > lookups, etc...), and Mailman talking o

Re: [Mailman-Users] "disable_dns_lookups = yes" is a very bad idea

2006-02-18 Thread Brad Knowles
At 11:06 PM -0500 2006-02-17, Jonathan Dill wrote: > Speaking ripe from experience, the Mailman FAQ suggests turning on > "disable_dns_lookups = yes" to improve the performance of Postfix with > Mailman, which kind of makes sense. BUT in Postfix, this disables all > MX lookups. So, unless yo