Jon-Arne Storelv wrote:
>Is there any possibility to send a rejection message when a message is
>bigger than the max_message_size?
Currently Mailman only holds these messages. Automatically rejecting
them requires patching Mailman/Handlers/Hold.py. If you wish to do
this, see the thread that begi
At 7:54 AM +0100 2006-01-08, Stig Nørgaard Færch wrote:
>> I was wondering if Mailman3 still is being developed?
>> The mailing list for MM3 seems pretty dead.
There hasn't been much list activity lately, but the package is
definitely still being developed. You should ask this questio
Stig Nørgaard Færch wrote:
> I was wondering if Mailman3 still is being developed?
> The mailing list for MM3 seems pretty dead.
>
> Also - are there any good alternatives to Mainman which have native
> support for lists with the same listname but on different domains
> (like [EMAIL PROTECTED] a
In a flurry of recycled electrons, Mark Phillips wrote:
> How do I set up a list so it is for announcements only? The recipients can
> --
> Mailman-Users mailing list
> Mailman-Users@python.org
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-
How do I set up a list so it is for announcements only? The recipients can
respond to the sender, but I don't want the recipients to be able to send to
each other. I guess the senders' email address should be in the rely-to
field, but the cc: field should be blank?
I read through the documenta
Is there any possibility to send a rejection message when a message is
bigger than the max_message_size?
Regards
Jon-Arne
--
Mailman-Users mailing list
Mailman-Users@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ:
Heather Madrone wrote:
>At 7:39 AM -0500 1/7/06, Ira Rosenblum wrote:
>>Last week I wrote that none of the mail (using Mailman 2.1.6) being
>>sent to my list was reaching the list members, but I have since
>>discovered that about 25% of the members (that's a rough estimate)
>>are receiving mail
At 7:39 AM -0500 1/7/06, Ira Rosenblum wrote:
>Last week I wrote that none of the mail (using Mailman 2.1.6) being
>sent to my list was reaching the list members, but I have since
>discovered that about 25% of the members (that's a rough estimate)
>are receiving mail, while the rest are not. It
Last week I wrote that none of the mail (using Mailman 2.1.6) being
sent to my list was reaching the list members, but I have since
discovered that about 25% of the members (that's a rough estimate)
are receiving mail, while the rest are not. It makes no sense to me.
The list has about 310
