* Mark Sapiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> So Mailman has folded a long subject according to RFC 2822 section
> 2.2.3, and it is not being properly unfolded by Postfix for logging.
>
> Or is there some other problem that I'm not seeing?
The problem is that the user's email client cannot display that f
nagarajan wrote:
>I am using redhat 9.0 I have Installed Mailman Using the RPM from the
> redhat9.0 CD. Whenever i am trying to open it i am getting the error the
> felow.Please let me know the solution.
>
>Bug in Mailman version 2.1
>
>We're sorry, we hit a bug!
>
>Traceback (most recent c
Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
>As you can see, =
>
>Subject: webKess Stations- / Abteilungsregistrierung Elisabeth_KH.1049
>was transformed into
>Subject: [webKess] webKess Stations- /
>Abteilungsregistrierung??Elisabeth_KH.1049
>
>(?? denotes a non-8-bit character). I wonder why a mere "space" sign
>n
* Ralf Hildebrandt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> * Ralf Hildebrandt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > (?? denotes a non-8-bit character).
>
> ?? denotes 2 non-printable characters. I'd need to check which ones
> EXACTLY.
Found out: It's a CR LF.
--
Ralf Hildebrandt (i.A. des IT-Zentrums) [EMAIL PROT
* Ralf Hildebrandt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> (?? denotes a non-8-bit character).
?? denotes 2 non-printable characters. I'd need to check which ones
EXACTLY.
--
Mailman-Users mailing list
Mailman-Users@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/list
* Tokio Kikuchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi all,
>
> I've just released Mailman 2.1.7rc1 Release Candidate. I'm sorry for
> the violation of file name extension convention because I made a small
> mistake when tagging the release number. I will be releasing 2.1.7
> final by December 31 if there
Hello,
I am using redhat 9.0 I have Installed Mailman Using the RPM from the
redhat9.0 CD. Whenever i am trying to open it i am getting the error the
felow.Please let me know the solution.
Thanks
Nagarajan
System admin iWave Systems
Bug in Mailman version 2.1
We're sorry, we hit a bug!