Oops, Sorry for the typo in the message title. I mean
Released: Mailman 2.1.7rc1 Release Candidate
Tokio Kikuchi wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've just released Mailman 2.1.7rc1 Release Candidate. I'm sorry for
> the violation of file name extension convention because I made a small
> mistake wh
Hi all,
I've just released Mailman 2.1.7rc1 Release Candidate. I'm sorry for
the violation of file name extension convention because I made a small
mistake when tagging the release number. I will be releasing 2.1.7
final by December 31 if there is no problem.
Please download it from SF or:
On Fri, 2005-12-23 at 09:22 +0900, Tokio Kikuchi wrote:
> May be we should set this default in Defaults.py.in in the next release
> of 2.1.7. Thoughts?
It's probably a good idea, but also as Stephen says, it might be a good
idea to shorten the filename (keeping the extension) even when this
valu
mcnutt wrote:
>
>I foolishly tried to upgrade from mailman 2.0.x to Mailman 2.1.6, and I
>heartily repent of my sin. I have attempted to restore back to my working
>version, but its still not running. Can anyone help me?
> - Transcript of session follows -
>Traceback (most recent call
I foolishly tried to upgrade from mailman 2.0.x to Mailman 2.1.6, and I
heartily repent of my sin. I have attempted to restore back to my working
version, but its still not running. Can anyone help me?
Bill McNutt
IT Administrator, UT Center for Literacy Studies
http://cls.coe.utk.edu
-Orig
Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
>> "Ben" == Ben Discoe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>Ben> Wow. I had no idea at all that it was possible to run Apache
>Ben> _inside_ Cygwin. The Apache website directs Windows people
>Ben> to just install and run, so the alternate route is not well
>
> "Ben" == Ben Discoe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Ben> Wow. I had no idea at all that it was possible to run Apache
Ben> _inside_ Cygwin. The Apache website directs Windows people
Ben> to just install and run, so the alternate route is not well
Ben> known.
You might want to
