Re: [Mailman-Users] nodupes flag

2005-12-01 Thread Mark Sapiro
Young, Darren wrote: > >> M.S. Wrote: >> You can set the old_domain subscription mail delivery to 'disabled' >> (nomail in the admin membership page). Then members in both domains >> will be able to post from either, but will only receive at new_domain >> > >A scriptlet that withlist could call to

Re: [Mailman-Users] nodupes flag

2005-12-01 Thread Young, Darren
> > It doesn't. That's not at all what it does. > Good thing I asked :-) What, 'rm -fr /' doesn't log me out? > > All nodups does, is when figuring the recipients for a post (not a > digest), if a particular member's address is found in To: or Cc: > headers of the post and that member has nodups

Re: [Mailman-Users] nodupes flag

2005-12-01 Thread Mark Sapiro
Young, Darren wrote: >What / how exactly does the 'nodupes' flag do? That page says it 'tries' >to filter out duplicate messages to users, how does it determine that 2 >addresses are in fact the same person? It doesn't. That's not at all what it does. >And on that, if I have 1 member >on a lis

[Mailman-Users] nodupes flag

2005-12-01 Thread Young, Darren
What / how exactly does the 'nodupes' flag do? That page says it 'tries' to filter out duplicate messages to users, how does it determine that 2 addresses are in fact the same person? And on that, if I have 1 member on a list with 2 addresses (same person), say [EMAIL PROTECTED] and [EMAIL PROTECTE

Re: [Mailman-Users] remove_members --fromall -f

2005-12-01 Thread Mark Sapiro
Xiaoyan Ma wrote: > >And I would love to help testing out the patch. But I got the follow error > >patching file remove_members >Hunk #2 FAILED at 110. >Hunk #3 succeeded at 97 with fuzz 2 (offset -34 lines). >1 out of 3 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file remove_members.rej Did you patch more

Re: [Mailman-Users] remove_members --fromall -f

2005-12-01 Thread Xiaoyan Ma
Mark: The dummy argument worked!! [EMAIL PROTECTED] bin]# ./remove_members --fromall -f /home/xma/removetest.txt dummy User [EMAIL PROTECTED]' removed from list: testlista. User [EMAIL PROTECTED]' removed from list: testlista. User [EMAIL PROTECTED]' removed from list: testlista. Thank you. And

[Mailman-Users] Blocking list on the server

2005-12-01 Thread Коваленко Иван
Is there a way to block list for a period of time certain maillist on the server? I mean, to block List Owners from using list. -- С уважением, Коваленко Иван, Элвис-Телеком mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Mailman-Users mailing lis

Re: [Mailman-Users] remove_members --fromall -f

2005-12-01 Thread Mark Sapiro
Xiaoyan Ma wrote: >On Thu, 1 Dec 2005 21:33:32 +0100 > Sythos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Il Thu, 01 Dec 2005 12:22:27 -0800 >> "Xiaoyan Ma" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> scrisse: >> >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] bin]$ sudo ./remove_members --fromall >>> -f /home/xma/removetest.txt Remove members from a list. >

Re: [Mailman-Users] remove_members --fromall -f

2005-12-01 Thread Xiaoyan Ma
On Thu, 1 Dec 2005 21:33:32 +0100 Sythos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Il Thu, 01 Dec 2005 12:22:27 -0800 > "Xiaoyan Ma" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> scrisse: > >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] bin]$ sudo ./remove_members --fromall >> -f /home/xma/removetest.txt Remove members from a list. >> >> Usage: >> remov

Re: [Mailman-Users] remove_members --fromall -f

2005-12-01 Thread Sythos
Il Thu, 01 Dec 2005 12:22:27 -0800 "Xiaoyan Ma" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> scrisse: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] bin]$ sudo ./remove_members --fromall > -f /home/xma/removetest.txt Remove members from a list. > > Usage: > remove_members [options] [listname] [addr1 ...] try: cat /home/xma/removetest.txt |

Re: [Mailman-Users] remove_members --fromall -f

2005-12-01 Thread Xiaoyan Ma
On Thu, 1 Dec 2005 11:15:35 -0800 Mark Sapiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Xiaoyan Ma wrote: >> >>But I am having trouble with >> >>../bin/remove_members --fromall -f /tmp/class04 > > > What specific trouble? > I can feed one address at a time: [EMAIL PROTECTED] bin]$ sudo ./remove_members --f

Re: [Mailman-Users] remove_members --fromall -f

2005-12-01 Thread Mark Sapiro
Xiaoyan Ma wrote: > >But I am having trouble with > >../bin/remove_members --fromall -f /tmp/class04 What specific trouble? >I found a patch by Marc Merlin back in 2001 which adds a special list name: >_alllists_ Where did you find it? Are you talking about patch number 413257 in the tracker

Re: [Mailman-Users] Uncaught bounce notifications

2005-12-01 Thread Mark Sapiro
Darren G Pifer wrote: > >Here is the message, as forwarded to me by the list owner on behalf of >the sender. I have changed the listname with LIST. This could be the >case where the sender was using a MS Outlook client, as pointed out by >the FAQ. If more information is needed, I will have to get t

[Mailman-Users] remove_members --fromall -f

2005-12-01 Thread Xiaoyan Ma
We need to clean up list subscripbers each semester when students graduate. I am having trouble with remove_members -h shows that: --file=file -f file Remove member addresses found in the given file. If file is `-', read stdin. --all -a Remove all me

Re: [Mailman-Users] Uncaught bounce notifications

2005-12-01 Thread Darren G Pifer
Hello, On Thu, 2005-12-01 at 12:25, Mark Sapiro wrote: > Darren G Pifer wrote: > > What is the sender (original poster) receiving, and why do you think it > is coming from your sendmail and not, for example, the bouncing > recipient's MTA? Here is the message, as forwarded to me by the list own

Re: [Mailman-Users] Uncaught bounce notifications

2005-12-01 Thread Mark Sapiro
Darren G Pifer wrote: > > I have seen on this mailing list a few posts on the thread of >"Uncaught bounce notifications" but have not found the answer I need. >One of our user's received one of these notifications and the list owner >wants to know why the user received it. She believed that if

Re: [Mailman-Users] Uncaught bounce notifications

2005-12-01 Thread Mark Sapiro
Brad Knowles wrote: >At 9:34 AM -0500 2005-11-30, Darren G Pifer wrote: > >> Also, is there a way to avoid user's replying to >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] We would, of course, prefer that >> subscribers to reply to [EMAIL PROTECTED] but the bounce address is >> the one that mailman uses when send

Re: [Mailman-Users] Uncaught bounce notifications

2005-12-01 Thread Brad Knowles
At 9:34 AM -0500 2005-11-30, Darren G Pifer wrote: > Also, is there a way to avoid user's replying to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] We would, of course, prefer that > subscribers to reply to [EMAIL PROTECTED] but the bounce address is > the one that mailman uses when sending the mail out.