Jared Rimer wrote:
>Understood, but what address would I be using for the bounce on the
>address that I'd use for the [EMAIL PROTECTED] Confused.
The issue here is that even humans have a hard time parsing the message
you received. If I had to guess, and that's all it would be in this
case, I'd
Understood, but what address would I be using for the bounce on the
address that I'd use for the [EMAIL PROTECTED] Confused.
At 21:21 11/8/2005, you wrote:
>Jared Rimer wrote:
>
> >I don't understand the second paragraph.
> >
> >At 20:26 11/8/2005, you wrote:
> >>Jared Rimer wrote:
> >>
> >> >Wo
David Hwang wrote:
>I know this is probably tangential to the purpose of the list, but
>
>people here have been very friendly and helpful in my quest to get
>mailman up and running on my Trustix system.
>
>I was following the mail delivery logs and came across some odd errors
>that I'm hoping so
I know this is probably tangential to the purpose of the list, but
people here have been very friendly and helpful in my quest to get
mailman up and running on my Trustix system.
I was following the mail delivery logs and came across some odd errors
that I'm hoping someone can help me decipher
Jared Rimer wrote:
>I don't understand the second paragraph.
>
>At 20:26 11/8/2005, you wrote:
>>Jared Rimer wrote:
>>
>> >Would the Eudora redirect work?
>>
>>It might. It removes a bunch of headers and replaces others and rewraps
>>the message body, but it might work. You could try it, but you'd
Jared Rimer wrote:
>Would the Eudora redirect work?
It might. It removes a bunch of headers and replaces others and rewraps
the message body, but it might work. You could try it, but you'd never
know if it worked or not, since if the bounce were unrecognized, it
would just go to the list owner as
I don't understand the second paragraph.
At 20:26 11/8/2005, you wrote:
>Jared Rimer wrote:
>
> >Would the Eudora redirect work?
>
>It might. It removes a bunch of headers and replaces others and rewraps
>the message body, but it might work. You could try it, but you'd never
>know if it worked or
Would the Eudora redirect work?
At 18:07 11/8/2005, you wrote:
>Jared Rimer wrote:
>
> >Let me try again. The mailing list is [EMAIL PROTECTED] When I
> >send to that list, I get the message I sent to this list back.
>
>
>Sorry, I misunderstood. I thought the message you posted came back when
>y
Jared Rimer wrote:
>Let me try again. The mailing list is [EMAIL PROTECTED] When I
>send to that list, I get the message I sent to this list back.
Sorry, I misunderstood. I thought the message you posted came back when
you emailed [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>I
>snet the message to mail over to [EMA
Let me try again. The mailing list is [EMAIL PROTECTED] When I
send to that list, I get the message I sent to this list back. I
snet the message to mail over to [EMAIL PROTECTED] to alert
them to this. No response. Is there another address like
[EMAIL PROTECTED] that I should be sending th
Harold Paulson wrote:
>
>Each .pck is a separate email message (to one recipient)? Or each one
>is a separate post with many recipients? Is 80-100 items in queue/out
>a lot?
Each .pck is a message. it could be a post in which case it identifies
all the recipients in one .pck or it could be so
Jared Rimer wrote:
>So, I would have to redirect it to [EMAIL PROTECTED] for example then?
>
in response to:
>>
>>Unfortunately, these non-compliant servers abound. There's nothing you
>>can do about it other than possibly redirecting it to the appropriate
>>-bounces' address at the site you mail
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mark,
>> As you can see, nearly an hour elapsed between the time the message
>> was
>> approved by a list moderator, and the time Mailman *started* delivery.
>> I would not expect that the MTA is involved in that part of the
>> process, at all.
>
>
>
So, I would have to redirect it to [EMAIL PROTECTED] for example then?
At 13:19 11/8/2005, you wrote:
>Jared Rimer wrote:
>
> > I had sent this to the list owners of the particular list
> >I'm subscribed to that generates this message, but why is it coming
> >back to me instead of mailman?
Harold Paulson wrote:
>
>On Nov 8, 2005, at 12:19 PM, Mark Sapiro wrote:
>
>[deletia]
>
>> Visit the FAQ wizard
>>> Mailman FAQ: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py
>> and search for performance.
>
>I am familiar with the optimization tips in the excellent FAQ, and have
>used them in the past
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mark,
Thank you for your quick reply.
On Nov 8, 2005, at 12:19 PM, Mark Sapiro wrote:
[deletia]
> Visit the FAQ wizard
>> Mailman FAQ: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py
> and search for performance.
I am familiar with the optimization tips
Jared Rimer wrote:
> I had sent this to the list owners of the particular list
>I'm subscribed to that generates this message, but why is it coming
>back to me instead of mailman?
>>X-Persona:
>>X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0 (2005-09-13) on wmailapp7-l3.webley
>>X-Spam-Leve
Andy Gao wrote:
>
>I am new to mailman. I installed mailman2.1.6 on my fedora core 3 machine
>from source. I used sendmail8.13.1-2 as MTA.
>
>I set up a new list, say [EMAIL PROTECTED], and I can subscribe to the list
>and I also get the mail from [EMAIL PROTECTED] to confirm my subscrision.
Do y
Hi all,
I had sent this to the list owners of the particular list
I'm subscribed to that generates this message, but why is it coming
back to me instead of mailman?
>X-Persona:
>X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0 (2005-09-13) on wmailapp7-l3.webley
>X-Spam-Level:
>X-Spam-Status:
Hi,
I am new to mailman. I installed mailman2.1.6 on my fedora core 3 machine
from source. I used sendmail8.13.1-2 as MTA.
I set up a new list, say [EMAIL PROTECTED], and I can subscribe to the list
and I also get the mail from [EMAIL PROTECTED] to confirm my subscrision.
But when I submit a mes
Harold Paulson wrote:
>
>I am having trouble with a slow outgoing queue. I am running Mailman
>2.1.6 on FreeBSD 4.11.
>
>
>Any idea what is causing the holdup for outgoing messages? Any tips
>that will help me trace this down? Thanks in advance.
Visit the FAQ wizard
>Mailman FAQ: http://www
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
I am having trouble with a slow outgoing queue. I am running Mailman
2.1.6 on FreeBSD 4.11.
Here is an example of a slow email traced through Mailman's logs:
At 10:18, a message is sent to the moderated "students" list I host,
and held:
lo
Bob Bales wrote:
>I am a novice at this, so be easy. I am running mailman for a friend of
>mine. I loaded it from the cpanel of the host. The message system seems to
>be working fine. The Admin Panel is giving me fits. I can sign in and make a
>change, when I press to submit the changes it takes m
I am a novice at this, so be easy. I am running mailman for a friend of
mine. I loaded it from the cpanel of the host. The message system seems to
be working fine. The Admin Panel is giving me fits. I can sign in and make a
change, when I press to submit the changes it takes me back to the sign in
Lyn Rees wrote:
>
>We have around 3000 lists in majordomo at the moment, but are due to
>change to mailman. We will run the two services side by side for a while
>if we need to, however we will need to migrate lists somehow either in
>one big bang or as we receive requests to do so.
>
>Are there an
Chris Barnes wrote:
>
>I guess what I am asking is for a way to be MM to process a
>.procmailrc - specific to each list - before distributing to the list.
I think header_filter_rules is lacking one thing that would allow your
simply dropping your procmail recipes directly in, and that is the
fact
I was interested in getting feedback from current mail group users.
We have mirrored your mail list in a new application that provides a more
aggregated and safe environment which utilizes the power of broadband.
Roomity.com v 1.5 is a web 2.01 community webapp. Our newest version adds
broadcas
Hi,
I'm sure this has been asked before but I couldn't find anything recent
anywhere.
We have around 3000 lists in majordomo at the moment, but are due to
change to mailman. We will run the two services side by side for a while
if we need to, however we will need to migrate lists somehow either i
Mark Sapiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> If you want mailman to deal with it, you can use header_filter_rules
> to recognize the headers and act accordingly, but why not just delete
> the spam before it gets to mailman?
That would be fine for MailMan, but not for everyone else (MM exists on
the
Mark,
Users was probably not the best term to use. I was speaking of
nefarious bad-doers. I did not want to have anything internet facing
that allowed for any type of administration. Your discussion was
very helpful and I believe that I know how I am going configure it,
well, attempt to
30 matches
Mail list logo
