Matt England wrote:
>I want to change the "admin" list on my Mailman site(s) from
>"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" to some other address, namely another another Mailman
>email list (in part because [EMAIL PROTECTED] gets spam, and also because I
>have a general [EMAIL PROTECTED] that handls all admin email
I want to change the "admin" list on my Mailman site(s) from
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" to some other address, namely another another Mailman
email list (in part because [EMAIL PROTECTED] gets spam, and also because I
have a general [EMAIL PROTECTED] that handls all admin email addresses).
Is this pos
James wrote:
>Is it possible to send rejection notice text to non-members if action
>to take for postings from non-members is 'Hold'?
When generic_nonmember_action is Hold and a non-member posts, the
poster receives a notice based on the postheld.txt template. See
http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/fa
At 11:16 AM -0400 2005-07-16, Jeff Squyres wrote:
> Specifically, mails to @example.com may
> not be conveniently lumped into 1 or 2 transfers to the MTA -- in a
> worst case, they may be spread out across 1000/SMTP_MAX_RCPTS transfers
> to the MTA.
I'd
LifeTrek Coaching wrote:
>My large list (40,000 names) is announcement only and all posts are held (to
>prevent the possibility of a spammer hijacking the list). So the "Schedule"
>option is the only one that would work. Simply scheduling when I send the
>post would not resolve the problem.
You c
LifeTrek Coaching wrote:
>When Mailman automatically removes a name from the list, I (as list owner
>and moderator) and receiving either 3 or 4 notices for each name that is
>removed. What is causing these multiple notices? How can I resolve the
>issue? Let me know. Thanks.
Are you listed in both
Finn Sindre Eliassen wrote:
>I've upgraded from Fedora 2 to FC4 and and are using mailman version
>2.1.35. It works fine, except for one thing; the old list members are
>gone. How can I retrieve them?
The location of the $prefix/lists/ directory changed from Fedora 2 to
FC4. You have to fi
James wrote:
>I added a footer to non-digest mailing list but for some reason it
>comes trough with each message as an attachment. I can't figure out
>why. Any suggestions?
See the FAQ
>Mailman FAQ: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py
Article 4.39
--
Mark Sapiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> T
I added a footer to non-digest mailing list but for some reason it
comes trough with each message as an attachment. I can't figure out
why. Any suggestions?
--
Mailman-Users mailing list
Mailman-Users@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/list
Daevid Vincent wrote:
>There should be a way under the "Membership Management... " section in the
>web UI to show all members who are set to 'no mail'. This way I can weed out
>users that are basically useless on the list.
See http://starship.python.net/crew/jwt/mailman/#throughtheweb for a
scrip
David Cake wrote:
> Is there a way to allow people who are subscribed to a second
>list to be accepted as subscribers to the first?
Not as subscribers, but see
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1220144&group_id=103&atid=300103
for a patch that allows the subscribers
Short version -- all good tips; many thanks. We're investigating them
all, but as you suggested, we're changing one thing at a time.
Checking them thoroughly takes a little while, so I probably won't be
able to report anything intelligent back on our results for a week or
so (gotta wait f
At 8:45 AM -0400 2005-07-16, Jeff Squyres wrote:
> Ah -- thanks for clarifying. This is not really what is implied in the
> FAQ (http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py?req=show&file=faq04.012.htp)
> -- I read it to imply that mailman is grouping messages to the MTA by
> domain in order to
On Jul 16, 2005, at 8:27 AM, Brad Knowles wrote:
>> We didn't change the value of SMTP_MAX_RCPTS between 2.1.5 and 2.1.6
>> (500). Perhaps this is too high (none of our lists have close to 500
>> subscribers in a single domain).
>
> That's not done on a per-domain basis. Let's say you h
At 8:15 AM -0400 2005-07-16, Jeff Squyres wrote:
> Clarifying question, however -- will mailman only make one SMTP
> connection at a time (and block all further outgoing processing until
> that one SMTP connection is complete)?
Yup.
> Is this w
At 3:31 AM +0200 2005-07-16, Carl Zwanzig wrote:
> I was definitly thinking of load averages, sendmail will reject connections
> if the LA is too high.
Yes, I know precisely what you were thinking about. That is
certainly one possibility, but it got me thinking about some others.
>
Our load averages are definitely quite small -- hovering below 1.0.
Our sendmail configuration hasn't changed since we upgraded to 2.1.6,
which is why we're [initially] thinking that it isn't a sendmail issue.
Our disks are also quite far from full -- we have oodles of disk
space.
Clari
17 matches
Mail list logo
