Matt England wrote:
>
>Can anyone provide recommendations for configuring the 'mailman' email
>list...that spans the virtual domains? Should one alias the virtual domain
>'mailman' list somehow to the "global" mailman list?
I assume here you're talking about a single, global Mailman serving all
Ok. Thanks for the quick response.
Can anyone provide recommendations for configuring the 'mailman' email
list...that spans the virtual domains? Should one alias the virtual domain
'mailman' list somehow to the "global" mailman list?
-Matt
At 6/12/2005 11:10 PM, Mark Sapiro wrote:
>Matt En
Matt England wrote:
>
>When will Mailman natively (ie, without patches) support 2 lists with the
>same name in different domains?
It's on the ToDo list (http://www.list.org/todo.html), but unless
someone comes up with a really good implementation in the mean time,
it probably won't happen before
Hello,
When will Mailman natively (ie, without patches) support 2 lists with the
same name in different domains?
I am presuming that the virtualhosts feature does not support this today;
if it does, can someone please reply to this thread to let me (us) know?
Until then, it looks like the best
Terry Allen wrote in reply to John Flemming:
>>> I wish to insert an ampersand (&) into the footer, but >>when I
>>> use plain &, it generates & into the footer. Should I >>enclose it
>>> in some way?
>
>>1. Create a plain text file in /bin named "footer". Make >your footer there
>>like this:
>> I wish to insert an ampersand (&) into the footer, but >>when I
>> use plain &, it generates & into the footer. Should I >>enclose it
>> in some way?
>1. Create a plain text file in /bin named "footer". Make >your footer there
>like this:
>msg_footer="""___
On 6/11/05 9:39 PM, "Mark Sapiro" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't understand why SMTPDirect.pyc is not recreated. It should be
> created when OutgoingRunner.py is initialized. It does
The typical--of Python generally--reason is that the process which does the
import doesn't have permissions
Hello!
> I didn't notice the '2' return code in your original post. I believed
> you when you said "mails are correctly delivered to mailman by exim:".
> The return code of '2' is a group mismatch error. Does exim give more
> information in the returned 'delivery failure' notice? See
> http://www.
I have just uploaded an updated patch that will make the web UI for
MM 2.1.6 XHTML 1.0 strict compliant. This patch allows for some CSS
formatting as well.
I have tried to make all the pages compliant, but I may have missed
some combinations of pages and options, so if you find some that
aren't
