In ver 2.1.4 I want to prevent subscription confirmation via the web.
Subscribing via the web is fine, but not confirmation. Allowing this lets
people/IPs black listed at server level in postfix to go around my spam
/security system.
Any help appreciated.
Tim
-
demo wrote:
>Just to say that this actually does not work for Apple's OS X Server version
>2.1.2 of Mailman ... Good heavens!
>
>It does somethings but I am not sure if it is my shortcomings or the
>proprietary version's.
>
>
>Adding; OWNERS_CAN_DELETE_THEIR_OWN_LISTS = Yes to
>
>/usr/share/mailma
Just to say that this actually does not work for Apple's OS X Server version
2.1.2 of Mailman ... Good heavens!
It does somethings but I am not sure if it is my shortcomings or the
proprietary version's.
Adding; OWNERS_CAN_DELETE_THEIR_OWN_LISTS = Yes to
/usr/share/mailman/Mailman/mm_cfg.py
Ad
Thanks for your very detailed mail. It made everything very clear. Mailman
is still not running, but I have some more details:
I did a "su mailman" and ran check_perms and indeed I do get an error
message. I ran check_perms -f before as root, reporting "no problems".
kundenserver:/var/
At 7:21 AM -0800 2004-11-24, Mark Sapiro wrote:
Hold for "suspicious header" occurs because a header matched one of the
regexps in bounce_matching_headers - see "legacy spam filters" in
Privacy options...->Spam filters.
Ahh. Found it. Apparently, there have been major spam
problems in the pa
At 8:04 AM -0800 2004-11-24, Mark Sapiro wrote:
Or are you saying it is in the list for the [EMAIL PROTECTED]
list?
That's what I meant by "Apparently, there have been major spam
problems in the past with ozemail.com.au".
--
Brad Knowles, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"Those who would give up essential
I had Mailman installed on my server by someone else (I know nothing about
using Unix Servers) but since then I've lost track of the person who did it
for me. I need to have the software upgraded on my server and wonder if
anyone on the list is knowledgeable enough to undertake that task for me.
At 6:15 PM +0100 2004-11-24, Brad Knowles wrote:
Or are you saying it is in the list for the [EMAIL PROTECTED]
list?
That's what I meant by "Apparently, there have been major spam problems
in the past with ozemail.com.au".
Anyway, this issue has been resolved.
--
Brad Knowles, <[EMAIL
Brad Knowles wrote:
>At 7:21 AM -0800 2004-11-24, Mark Sapiro wrote:
>
>> Hold for "suspicious header" occurs because a header matched one of the
>> regexps in bounce_matching_headers - see "legacy spam filters" in
>> Privacy options...->Spam filters.
>
> Ahh. Found it. Apparently, ther
At 7:21 AM -0800 2004-11-24, Mark Sapiro wrote:
Hold for "suspicious header" occurs because a header matched one of the
regexps in bounce_matching_headers - see "legacy spam filters" in
Privacy options...->Spam filters.
Ahh. Found it. Apparently, there have been major spam problems
in the pa
Brad Knowles wrote:
>At 7:13 PM +1100 2004-11-24, Terry Allen wrote:
>
>> Many thanks for the above & your last reply. I'm still unsure as to why
>> my posts are being held prior to being sent - they are getting through,
>> but something about a 'suspcicous header'. Possibly because my addr
On Tue, 23 Nov 2004, Mark Sapiro wrote:
> Matthew Saltzman
> >On Tue, 23 Nov 2004, Mark Sapiro wrote:
> >
> >> Matthew Saltzman wrote:
> >>
> >> >I have a Web server that serves a couple of different sites, aaa.com and
> >> >bbb.com (say). It also is my Mailman host for both domains.
> >> >
> >>
At 7:13 PM +1100 2004-11-24, Terry Allen wrote:
Many thanks for the above & your last reply. I'm still unsure as to why
my posts are being held prior to being sent - they are getting through,
but something about a 'suspcicous header'. Possibly because my address
is actually sent from our
Bryan Fullerton wrote:
On Wed, 24 Nov 2004 08:16:05 +1100, Terry Allen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Is it possible to delete a list using the HTML pages in
Mailman? If not, am I correct in that deleting a list requires
running the rmlist command from the command line like this:
Good questi
14 matches
Mail list logo
