On Mon, Oct 04, 2004 at 09:50:52PM -0700, Bill Moseley wrote:
> Hi Jim,
>
> Thanks for responding.
>
> On Tue, Oct 05, 2004 at 12:50:02PM +0900, Jim Tittsler wrote:
> > Yes. The admin(s) will see each bounce, just as they see the ones now
> > that the bounce processor doesn't know how to unders
On Tue, Oct 05, 2004 at 12:31:53PM +1000, Zebee Johnstone wrote:
>
> Mailman version 2.05
> httpd log:
> [Tue Oct 5 12:04:47 2004] [error] [client 218.214.72.52] Premature end of script
> headers: /home/mailman/cgi-bin/admin
And thanks to Tokio Kikuchi the answer was simple... and the log was
I know bugger all about python, if it was a perlscript I'd try putting
in debugging info
Hmm. Since it is (admin|admindb)/listname, cookie might be a cause of
problem. I suggest clearing your browser's cookie and access the URL.
And, you can put code like this in the python mailman script:
f
Hi Jim,
Thanks for responding.
On Tue, Oct 05, 2004 at 12:50:02PM +0900, Jim Tittsler wrote:
> Yes. The admin(s) will see each bounce, just as they see the ones now
> that the bounce processor doesn't know how to understand. But that
> also stops Mailman from managing the bounces.
Ok, so I d
On Oct 5, 2004, at 04:24, Bill Moseley wrote:
I run a few lists where it's important to know that the message was
delivered to everyone on the list. So, although I'd like mailmain to
continue to manage bounces, I'd also like to get a notification of
every bounce.
[...]
I'm not 100% clear on the Bo
Hi,
I can't tell what is happening in your site but commands in bin
directory may help troubleshoot. Invoking the commands with --help
option tells what they are intended for. I suggest trying bin/check_db.
Also, check the locks directory if there are stale lock files.
Zebee Johnstone wrote:
Sud
On 10/4/2004 17:39, "Brad Knowles" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At 5:17 PM -0700 2004-10-04, John W. Baxter wrote:
>
>> OK, so what does Eudora do to make the RFC 2919 headers useful? All I think
>> it does out of the box is not filter any of them in its presentation of a
>> message, leading
Last Friday afternoon RoadRunner systems across the US began
blocking e-mail send via my mailman lists. The logs show: "Deferred: 452
Too many recipients received this hour." (The reason I caught this is I
saw a build up in my outgoing Sendmail queue.)
The odd thing is I send
Suddenly - as in it has been working fine, but some time in the last week
it has failed - the admin interface of all my lists is giving a 500 error.
listinfo is fine, mail is flowing freely.
Mailman version 2.05
httpd log:
[Tue Oct 5 12:04:47 2004] [error] [client 218.214.72.52] Premature end o
At 5:17 PM -0700 2004-10-04, John W. Baxter wrote:
OK, so what does Eudora do to make the RFC 2919 headers useful? All I think
it does out of the box is not filter any of them in its presentation of a
message, leading to endless complaints about "those headers" and being the
prime trigger for
Derrick Seymour wrote:
>Would there be any reason why I am receiving two approval emails for every
>post on a list. Should I receive an approval email for every post?
Depends on list settings.
>If yes
>or no, why am I receiving two?
Do they both give the same reason for why the post is held fo
On 10/4/2004 14:04, "Brad Knowles" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At 10:24 AM -0700 2004-10-04, John W. Baxter wrote:
>
>> Now look at Qualcom's MUA products and their implementation of the RFC.
>> This appears to be low priority, in that Eudora 5 and 6 have emerged since
>> the RFC.
>
> Qualco
At 3:38 PM -0700 2004-10-04, p e y t o n wrote:
unlike my other installations of mailman this situation is unique because
i am not providing dns for the domain. the host where
i want mailman to live is being pointed at me by another server running
bind.
Hmm. Do they point to you via a CNAME
all,
many thanks for the suggestions. however, the original problem remains
unresolved.
per the mailer error and confirmed by jim tittsler's post, this is not a
sendmail/aliases issue. mailman does not see the list "test" and therefore
the "post" script is failing. however, when i execute "list
At 3:03 PM -0400 2004-10-04, David L Brown wrote:
Under 2.0.8 messages to a members-only-posting list entering from the
News gateway would be held for non-members. With 2.1.5 we were alarmed
to see such messages being posted without any moderation control even
though generic_nonmember_action wa
At 10:24 AM -0700 2004-10-04, John W. Baxter wrote:
Now look at Qualcom's MUA products and their implementation of the RFC.
This appears to be low priority, in that Eudora 5 and 6 have emerged since
the RFC.
Qualcomm does just fine in this respect. Qualcomm is not the
problem. Microsoft is t
I'm running 2.0.11
I run a few lists where it's important to know that the message was
delivered to everyone on the list. So, although I'd like mailmain to
continue to manage bounces, I'd also like to get a notification of
every bounce.
Is there a way to set this up?
I'm not 100% clear on the B
Under 2.0.8 messages to a members-only-posting list entering from the
News gateway would be held for non-members. With 2.1.5 we were alarmed
to see such messages being posted without any moderation control even
though generic_nonmember_action was set to 'Hold'. We could find no
ther settings to con
Would there be any reason why I am receiving two approval emails for every
post on a list. Should I receive an approval email for every post? If yes
or no, why am I receiving two?
OSX Server 10.3.4
Pretty new still, any help would be great..sorry for the greenness
Derrick Seymour
---
On 10/4/2004 1:16, "Stephen J. Turnbull" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The only disadvantage to this approach is that it requires cooperation
> from the large MUA vendors like Microsoft and Qualcomm, and the users
> know they're far more likely to get sympathy and timely action, at no
> cost in mon
Well, I thought I would contribute what I have done to get majordomo and
mailman running on the same host. This all done with sendmail 8.13.1+
version so use those sendmail books if you have an older/newer version
of sendmail. Add the following flags to mm-handler under sendmail:
Add these to th
Maybe this option could be more precisely described as "acknowledge
receipt by Mailman of each post to the member who posted it". I'm
afraid the cascade of prepositions is more confusing than the simpler
phrasing, though. I think the best solution is to just fix the German
translation.
> "Ka
> "demo" == demo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
demo> I am not a coder and so cannot help I am afraid but may be
demo> an upgrade would be to autogenerate an email with a series
demo> of clickable links that generate emails that work with the
demo> given addresses.
demo> ...
23 matches
Mail list logo
