Re: [Mailman-Users] topic regep exclude

Mark Sapiro wrote: Howard Moscovitz wrote: In the topic definition form, how can one specify a topic that is only messages that DOES NOT have the string [G2] in it. see http://docs.python.org/lib/re-syntax.html I would try ^(?!.*\[G2\]) or if case is not significant ^(?!.*\[[Gg]2\]) but

Re: [Mailman-Users] Pretty good Announcement only How-to + more on Mac

um, I happen to know those folks pretty well. They're as responsive as they can be, given they have the same kind of restrictions we all do (even here in Mailman-land): can't do everything for everyone, because there isn't enough resource, and not everything ought to be done. won't speak for th

Re: [Mailman-Users] Pretty good Announcement only How-to + more on Mac

At 11:45 AM -0700 2004-09-25, Chuq Von Rospach wrote: Um, Apple has supported Mailman for years. They pay my salary, and have fully supported me in putting my time and energy into this project. The problem is that there are different groups within Apple. There's the group you're a part of, and

Re: [Mailman-Users] Pretty good Announcement only How-to + more on Mac

demo wrote: >As it comes up often [ and I've only been here a few weeks ], there is also >a pretty good Announcement only How-to here : > >http://www.modwest.com/help/kb13-195.html > The FAQ article at http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py?req=show&file=faq03.011.htp may not be as easy to rea

Re: [Mailman-Users] Pretty good Announcement only How-to + more on Mac

On Sep 25, 2004, at 11:28 AM, demo wrote: Just out of interest, have Apple actually put anything back *into* your development community? Looking into the future, you might want to hive off a lost-Mac-tech-mailman list ... My guess is that there are going to be a whole load of lost souls headed th

[Mailman-Users] Pretty good Announcement only How-to + more on Mac

As it comes up often [ and I've only been here a few weeks ], there is also a pretty good Announcement only How-to here : http://www.modwest.com/help/kb13-195.html > Please understand, I'm a MacFanatic myself. I don't like having > to say negative things about them, but Apple leaves us no choic

Re: [Mailman-Users] Email command upgrade

Mark Sapiro wrote: > >One reason these are templates is to enable site specific changes to >meet site needs. You can edit these templates and a future update will >not overlay your changes. > Clarification: The last sentence above applies if you are upgrading from source. I have no idea what will

Re: [Mailman-Users] Option to suppress senders' email addresses?

Douglas McCarroll wrote: > >Is there any way to tell MailMan to display only the sender's name, rather than >name and email address? > >E.g. "Douglas McCarroll" rather than "Douglas McCarroll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>". > I am guessing you mean in the From: header of outgoing posts. Aside from the fact

Re: [Mailman-Users] Email command upgrade

demo wrote: > >Just some humble feedback on the response message; > >This is one area where I find users fall over and die and the complexity of >the response and don't know what to do. [ And it is usually normal users >that are trying to use it to unsubscribe ]. It is very techie. > >Little things

Re: [Mailman-Users] Upgrade question

Ashley M. Kirchner wrote: > >Having moved from mailman 2.0.11 to 2.1.5, I'm left with a few >questions: > >1) What, if anything, do I need to do to make sure the old lists >work with the new mailman? When I installed 2.1.5, it told me that it >checked/fixed/converted lists at the very e

Re: [Mailman-Users] Love it . . . but

Wow. That wasn't what I was hoping to hear. I guess this is what happens when you try to use the built-in features and trusting that the GUI setup is going to do what you say. Thanks for the help Brad. I am consulting the FAQs as I write this. On Sep 25, 2004, at 10:28 AM, Brad Knowles wrote: At

Re: [Mailman-Users] Love it . . . but

At 10:10 AM -0400 2004-09-25, Timothy Hagan wrote: I had all the users, except myself, set for no-posting to the list, yet they were all able to do so. What did I do wrong? Did you go to the Mailman FAQ Wizard at and read all the entries found by sea

Re: [Mailman-Users] Option to suppress senders' email addresses?

At 9:06 AM -0400 2004-09-25, Douglas McCarroll wrote: Is there any way to tell MailMan to display only the sender's name, rather than name and email address? Display this where? -- Brad Knowles, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Saf

[Mailman-Users] Love it . . . but

My first experience with Mailman was not a good one. Of course, the issue I first posted to the list can be attributed to the fact that web services were not enabled on my OS 10.3 Server. However, the first few test posts that I sent to the list went out to everyone successfully. Unfortunately,

[Mailman-Users] Option to suppress senders' email addresses?

Hi All, Is there any way to tell MailMan to display only the sender's name, rather than name and email address? E.g. "Douglas McCarroll" rather than "Douglas McCarroll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>". TIA Douglas -- Mailman-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTEC

Re: [Mailman-Users] Email command upgrade

At 12:27 PM +0100 2004-09-25, demo wrote: I am not a coder and so cannot help I am afraid but may be an upgrade would be to autogenerate an email with a series of clickable links that generate emails that work with the given addresses. Mailman is an open source project, and we would welcome any

Re: [Mailman-Users] Pipermail public mailing list archive question

At 8:08 PM -0700 2004-09-24, Dana Rasmussen wrote: Is it absolutely necessary to configure the web server to point to the Pipermail public archives? If you want the archives to be accessible, yes. Since Mailman puts a number of headers (and optionally, footers) on the outgoing messages which

[Mailman-Users] Re: more on emails commands

One other aside, When one uses an email command to a list such as; [EMAIL PROTECTED] To a list that is set up announcement only or emergency moderation, the first thing you get back is the message one has set to say, e.g. " sorry, only administrators can post to this list ". *Then* one receives

[Mailman-Users] che javabi!!!!

aghaa in javabaa chiye midin -- Mailman-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users Mailman FAQ: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users

[Mailman-Users] (no subject)

aghaa in javabaa chiye midin -- Mailman-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users Mailman FAQ: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users

[Mailman-Users] Email command upgrade

Hi Just some humble feedback on the response message; This is one area where I find users fall over and die and the complexity of the response and don't know what to do. [ And it is usually normal users that are trying to use it to unsubscribe ]. It is very techie. Little things might help, like