Hi,
Jul 28 16:10:07 2004 (27374) Uncaught runner exception: [Errno 36] File name too long:
'/var/lib/mailman/archives/private/abuse/attachments/20040727/f9525c89/iso-2022-jpBSRskQicwGyhCNSAtIDVJIC0gODYgLSAbJEInISdfJ1QnXSdaJ20bKEIiso-2022-jpBGyRCJ2MnXCdaJ1sbKEIgGyRCJ2MbKEIgGyRCJ2EnYidWJ2EnYCdVGyhCi
Christian Balzer wrote:
>
>So my question is:
>
>What the heck is causing it to archive those attachments in the first
>place? I don't want this stuff archived, esp. not considering it
>might trigger the above bug again.
It archives the attachments because digests (at least non-MIME digests)
do n
Hello,
Versions first, this is Debian Sarge, so mailman 2.1.4-5 and
python 2.3.4-1. And I'm perfectly fine to take this up with the
Debian package maintainer, but I believe this to be not entirely
distribution specific.
2 days ago a mailing list here stopped working while all other
lists on the
Hi all,
I need to bounce messages automatically to certain lists - at the moment they
sut waiting for moderation. These lists have a select number of senders, the
rest I just need to bounce.
Can I write a script to bounce these using the command line or something? Any
ideas, anyone??
Thanks,
Hunter Hillegas wrote:
>
>We have a announce-only list. The announcer is sending from AOL client v8.
>This client CAN ONLY send HTML mail. There is no way (according to AOL) to
>get it to send plain text.
>
>The list is setup to filter the content and convert to plain text. We don't
>want any HTML
Michael Ewens wrote:
>I am trying to build a web interface that sends mail to a Mailman list
>(using Mailman 2.0.13). Using php, I am constructing and sending a
>message (using the mail() function). I have added:
>
>Approve:
>
>to the header information of a text/plain and text/html email, n
Brad, thanks for the reply. I do understand that the Mailman
installation on Mac OSX Server differs from other installations and is
largely unsupported by the Mailman folks. However I have found at least
two others who have encountered this exact same issue on the Mac.
Currently there appea
At 11:29 AM -0700 2004-07-28, Hunter Hillegas wrote:
I guess what I am asking is if anyone knows how this encoding is taking
place. I assume it is the AOL client... But if anyone knows anything about
this or how he can prevent the system from doing this... He's not super
computer savvy and he's
Hunter Hillegas wrote:
We are running 2.1.5 with Sendmail on RHEL 2.1.
We have a announce-only list. The announcer is sending from AOL client v8.
This client CAN ONLY send HTML mail. There is no way (according to AOL) to
get it to send plain text.
The list is setup to filter the content and conver
> Did you mean to reply off list???
No Sorry!
> Are the outgoing messages VERP'd? Just a thought, but perhaps
> they are sent with a VERP like envelope and when returned,
> the MTA doesn't know how to deliver them.
I had added VERP_PERSONALIZED_DELIVERIES to my mm_cfg (but one of the
other optio
We are running 2.1.5 with Sendmail on RHEL 2.1.
We have a announce-only list. The announcer is sending from AOL client v8.
This client CAN ONLY send HTML mail. There is no way (according to AOL) to
get it to send plain text.
The list is setup to filter the content and convert to plain text. We do
I am trying to build a web interface that sends mail to a Mailman list
(using Mailman 2.0.13). Using php, I am constructing and sending a
message (using the mail() function). I have added:
Approve:
to the header information of a text/plain and text/html email, neither
being approved. Inste
I have been given the task to upgrade our mail server which is running
Mailman 2.0.12
The existing server will be replaced with a completely rebuild box with
the latest versions of Mailman and Postfix. I have no previous
experience with Mailman so I have no idea how to move the current
Mailman c
Is there any sort of plugin support possible for mailman?
I have an interesting scenario where the end-user wants to be able to
subscribe users to a sort of mailing list, where once a week for birthdays
and anniversaries, a cron-job generates a list of people who are due the
week following, and ei
Hi,
The timestamps on messages in our Mailman archives are all 1 hour ahead of
reality. Any ideas?
I'm in the UK, where it's currently summertime, which is UTC +0100. Typing
'date' on our Mailman box gives
Wednesday July 28 15:24:33 BST 2004
which looks correct to me.
I've found that I c
15 matches
Mail list logo