Re: [Mailman-Users] archiving on mailman

Ako Ito wrote: hello gurus, is it possible on mailman 2.1.4 to not scrubbed the mailman attachments on the archives? just leave it as is? if not what other solutions do i need to undertake for me accomplish this? So, how do you retrieve the attachments from the archive ? Without scrubbing, you w

[Mailman-Users] archiving on mailman

hello gurus, is it possible on mailman 2.1.4 to not scrubbed the mailman attachments on the archives? just leave it as is? if not what other solutions do i need to undertake for me accomplish this? thanks -- Mailman-Users mailing list [EMAIL PR

RE: [Mailman-Users] Apache/Mailman with existing IIS

So the only way to keep them both is to open up port 80 traffic on the linux box / router as well?? SC From: Brad Knowles [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wed 6/2/2004 6:17 PM To: Scot Condry Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Mailman-Users] Apache/Mailman

Re: [Mailman-Users] groupname and mail-gid

More on this... When mailman is launched from procmail, the gid of the process is apparently assigned to the mailman user's primary group (from the passwd file). I recompiled mailman with groupname AND mail-gid both set to "mail", but still got the error ... until I edited passwd to change the

Re: [Mailman-Users] Add Auto Number to the subject's prefix

Hi Brad: > See the FAQ entry at > . Thank you very very much :) On Thu, 3 Jun 2004 03:15:31 +0200 Brad Knowles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > At 8:45 AM +0800 2004/06/03, Wang wei wrote: > > > I just use the Mailman 2.

Re: [Mailman-Users] Apache/Mailman with existing IIS

At 5:05 PM -0700 2004/06/02, Scot Condry wrote: My firewall (2 nics, the static IP and 192.168.1.1) sends port 80 traffic to 192.168.1.105 my windows server. And I can tell IIS to redirect traffic for http://linux.mydomain.com to a URL, google, cnn whatever... it works. But I cant get it to re

Re: [Mailman-Users] Add Auto Number to the subject's prefix

At 8:45 AM +0800 2004/06/03, Wang wei wrote: I just use the Mailman 2.1.5 with CJK codes supported. And I has a problem here How to add Auto Number in the prefix of the Subject See the FAQ entry at . In the future, before

[Mailman-Users] Add Auto Number to the subject's prefix

hi all: I just use the Mailman 2.1.5 with CJK codes supported. And I has a problem here How to add Auto Number in the prefix of the Subject For example: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 's subject prefix is [Mailman-Users] and I want to add the Auto Number looks like this [Mailman-Users:01] when next mai

[Mailman-Users] Apache/Mailman with existing IIS

Anyone in this situation?: I am running Fedora 2 on a linux box that acts as my router and firewall. It is also running as my only mail server (Postfix) and also Mailman. Everything else in the network is Windows including the server Windows 2000. I already had a couple of pages hosted on

Re: [Mailman-Users] implicit destination problem

On Wed, 2 Jun 2004 13:26:28 -0500, Dan Phillips <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Jun 2, 2004, at 1:22 PM, Lonni J Friedman wrote: > > The admin of the list isn't me, i just admin the physical box, and the > > list admin is afraid of spam, so he wants to have tight control over > > what can get

RE: [Mailman-Users] overwrite entire list

Thomas, I refresh my lists on a daily basis and I use the following commands to remove all members and then import an updated list: bin/remove_members -anN listname bin/add_members -wn -an -r filename list These two commands will do what you want silently without notifying the members of the lis

[Mailman-Users] groupname and mail-gid

Here's the short version of my question: is there a reason why I should NOT use the same group "mail" for both the "--with-groupname" and "--with-mail-gid" configure options? The long version is this. I'm having some difficulties with gids. I'm running mailman 2.1.5 and sendmail 8.12.10 on a

[Mailman-Users] overwrite entire list

I have about a dozen lists that I need to dump entirely and import from scratch. I see the ability to do a mass remove- but not sure how to/ what to upload to accomplish that. If I upload a new file will that overwrite or append to the current list? Thx, -- Thomas Waters Director of Informati

[Mailman-Users] Re: Removing "on behalf of"

On Sat, May 29, 2004 at 12:19:12PM +0200, Thomas Hochstein wrote: > "John S. Strock" schrieb: > > > How do I remove the "On behalf of" in the 'From' field? > > There *is* no "on behalf of" in the Fom:-field. You just have to use a > client that does not show it that way. This is just the way som

[Mailman-Users] Get a list of approved posters?

Is there a way to generate a list of either all approved posters or of the entire list of subscribers with account information intact. I know that I can see the list in the admin interface, with the sending permissions, but it is a large list and I would like to see easily see this information

[Mailman-Users] Edit HTML code

Hi All, Could someone tell me if it is possible to change other html code in mailman. I found the edit HTML pages option in admin activities. Those has been modified. If possible to edit other code, can you tell me where to find the codes for: * Welcome page that includes all public lists,

Re: [Mailman-Users] implicit destination problem

On Wed, 2 Jun 2004 13:11:08 -0500, Dan Phillips <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Jun 2, 2004, at 12:50 PM, Lonni J Friedman wrote: > > The problem is that all the mail for the list is > > always held for approval because of the implicit destination. > > > > Don't know about the % question, but w

[Mailman-Users] implicit destination problem

Greetings, I've got a mailman list (version 2.0.14) behind a firewall. As a result, anyone trying to send mail to that list sends it to an external email address which is of the format: [EMAIL PROTECTED] That address then gets translated internally and forwards the mail to the mailman list. The

Re: [Mailman-Users] SMS mailing list

"Ben M. Swihart" schrieb: > First problem is... I don't seem to be able to set the list to not > require confirmation for subscription. This is a closed, internally > managed list that is not open to the public. Confirmations are not > needed. How do I disable required confirmation? Just enter

RE: [Mailman-Users] SMS mailing list

Thank you, Jim. How do I restrict this option to a particular list? It seems global. Also, the "Errors-to:" field is the field that is being grabbed and stuffed into the body of the SMS message. Is there a way to change/disable that? - Ben -Original Message- From: Jim Tittsler [m

Re: [Mailman-Users] SMS mailing list

On Wed, Jun 02, 2004 at 10:39:42AM -0400, Ben M. Swihart wrote: > First problem is... I don't seem to be able to set the list to not > require confirmation for subscription. This is a closed, internally > managed list that is not open to the public. Confirmations are not > needed. How do I disab

[Mailman-Users] SMS mailing list

Hello, I am trying to create a mailman list that is delivered via SMS to phones. First problem is... I don't seem to be able to set the list to not require confirmation for subscription. This is a closed, internally managed list that is not open to the public. Confirmations are not needed. How

[Mailman-Users] list archives

Hello everyone, I want to know how I can delete the old messages in my archives. Thanks Rich S. -- -- Mailman-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users Mailman FAQ: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/

[Mailman-Users] Change user

Can I change the user that runs mailman? After installing mailman and Apache (and successfully running it for a few months), I have discovered that nobody is not a suitable user for this (PHP-Nuke isn't happy). Can anyone offer any suggestions short of reinstalling and migrating the existing lis

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman Blocking Squirrelmail: Bad headers?

At 10:03 PM -0700 2004/06/01, Karl R. Balsmeier wrote: I am unable to get mails from squirrelmail-based https sessions to get to the lists I have curently working properly for all other methods of posting/replying. Joining works, but posting does not. Doing a bit of Googling on an unrelated to

Re: [Mailman-Users] How can I update 2.1.3 --> 2.1.5?

for 2.1.3 -> 2.1.5 upgrade, you can safely stop qrunners if you don't like to stop MTA. So, the fact that messages will be queued in the old format during the upgrade doesn't matter? Or, are they not queued in the old format? My bet is that bin/update program which is executed at the end of upgra

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman Blocking Squirrelmail: Bad headers?

At 10:03 PM -0700 2004/06/01, Karl R. Balsmeier wrote: I'm using Mailman 2.1.2 on obsd. I've seen a few threads that match my current situation: I am unable to get mails from squirrelmail-based https sessions to get to the lists I have curently working properly for all other methods of posting

Re: [Mailman-Users] Dealing with AOL rejects

At 10:41 AM +0100 2004/06/02, Ian A B Eiloart wrote: If you need further help, Carl Hutzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> is the guy to talk to. Is he the guy responsible for the fact that AOL bounce spam addressed to unknown recipients, rather than rejecting it. Cos that really gets on my nerves

Re: [Mailman-Users] How can I update 2.1.3 --> 2.1.5?

--On Wednesday, June 2, 2004 6:36 am +0900 Tokio Kikuchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, 1. The file says "BE SURE TO TURN OFF MAILMAN AS DESCRIBED ABOVE BEFORE YOU UPGRADE." - but that isn't described above. The closest I could see was a recommendation to switch off my MTA. I want to avoid th

Re: [Mailman-Users] Dealing with AOL rejects

--On Wednesday, June 2, 2004 12:56 am +0200 Brad Knowles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: If you need further help, Carl Hutzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> is the guy to talk to. Is he the guy responsible for the fact that AOL bounce spam addressed to unknown recipients, rather than rejecting it. Cos th