Hello all,
I am setting up a new freebsd box 5.1 and decided to get away from
sendmail and went with Xmail 1.17
I have only found really one document on the web that discusses this and
I have followed it as far as I can go.
I have ran configure and make install
Edited a few files and when I get
On Mon, 2003-12-22 at 16:58, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I have not had any response to this. Can anyone speak to this at all?
>
>
> - Original Message Follows -
> > Can someone tell me if the mailman 2.1.3 sendmail interface is safe
> > from addresses that contain shell meta-characters?
>
This *exact* problem was discussed in the archives awhile back. If
memory serves me correctly the problem then was that the email client
used a generic type of mime file type identifier rather than a more
proper one that identified the file type properly as pdf.
Mailman then treats this as a gener
I have not had any response to this. Can anyone speak to this at all?
- Original Message Follows -
> Can someone tell me if the mailman 2.1.3 sendmail interface is safe
> from addresses that contain shell meta-characters?
>
>
>
>
> Kevin W. Gagel
> Network Administ
I have not had any response on this. Does anyone have any info they
can share with me on it?
- Original Message Follows -
> We just sent out a message to our employees. There calling because
> they can't open the pdf attachment.
>
> Looking at it, it looks like the .pdf part is missing f
Hi,
I installed mailman-2.1.2 on a Linux box that has Postfix(with virtual
domains on Mysql) and Maildrop. I created a list ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) where my
domain.com is a virtual domain. When a person send a email to this email list,
the system complains that this email don't exist. Does anyone
On 22 Dec 2003, Jon Carnes wrote:
> On Mon, 2003-12-22 at 12:25, Chris Johnson wrote:
> > Jon,
> >
> > Are you familiar with the code at all in admindb? I'm tracing
> > back up from line 150. Again, I don't really know python, but if I'm
> > reading this right, the line where it's sup
22-Dec-03 at 12:44, Jon Carnes ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
> On Mon, 2003-12-22 at 12:25, Chris Johnson wrote:
> > Jon,
> >
> > Are you familiar with the code at all in admindb? I'm tracing
> > back up from line 150. Again, I don't really know python, but if I'm
> > reading this right,
On Mon, 2003-12-22 at 12:25, Chris Johnson wrote:
> Jon,
>
> Are you familiar with the code at all in admindb? I'm tracing
> back up from line 150. Again, I don't really know python, but if I'm
> reading this right, the line where it's supposed to grab the
> QUERY_STRING from the HTTP
Jon,
Are you familiar with the code at all in admindb? I'm tracing
back up from line 150. Again, I don't really know python, but if I'm
reading this right, the line where it's supposed to grab the
QUERY_STRING from the HTTP environment is completely empty.
Wierd!
---
SourceForge recently instituted a donation system for projects and
users, whereby you can donate some money to a PayPal account to show
your appreciation for the free and open source projects you use.
Donations to projects require opt-in from all the project's admins.
Jeremy and I have both opted
On 22 Dec 2003, Jon Carnes wrote:
> Those rpms should give you all the Python you need.
>
> Have you tried "VIRTUAL_HOST_OVERVIEW = 0" in your mm_cfg.py file?
Uh, nope. Um, maybe I'm doing something wrong but I don't
see any difference in listings. What should I be looking for?
> Wha
On Mon, 2003-12-22 at 10:59, Chris Johnson wrote:
> On 22 Dec 2003, Jon Carnes wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 2003-12-22 at 09:25, Chris Johnson wrote:
> > > Hi.
> > >
> > > I've updated to mailman 2.1.3 on my rh7.3 system. The lists
> > > work. Most of the admin functions work. Check_perms sa
On 22 Dec 2003, Jon Carnes wrote:
> On Mon, 2003-12-22 at 09:25, Chris Johnson wrote:
> > Hi.
> >
> > I've updated to mailman 2.1.3 on my rh7.3 system. The lists
> > work. Most of the admin functions work. Check_perms says everything
> > is ok. However, the functions available from
On Mon, 2003-12-22 at 09:29, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I am actually not speaking for myself on HTML email - but over 8000 list
> users that voluntarily signup to receive it.
>
> It is a Redhat 2.1AS RPM. This is RedHat's new Enterprise Series
> distribution with extended life errata (5 years)
On Mon, 2003-12-22 at 09:25, Chris Johnson wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I've updated to mailman 2.1.3 on my rh7.3 system. The lists
> work. Most of the admin functions work. Check_perms says everything
> is ok. However, the functions available from the admindb CGI don't
> work. They didn't in 2
Hello, I'm new at administering a mailman list and I'm having problems with
bounces.
Every time someone write to the list I receive lots of mails notificating
bounces. after receiving them I enter the administrative interface and I
find checked the nomail check box with reason [B] and then I unchec
I am actually not speaking for myself on HTML email - but over 8000 list
users that voluntarily signup to receive it.
It is a Redhat 2.1AS RPM. This is RedHat's new Enterprise Series
distribution with extended life errata (5 years) and up2date support for
automatically updating the distribution
Hi.
I've updated to mailman 2.1.3 on my rh7.3 system. The lists
work. Most of the admin functions work. Check_perms says everything
is ok. However, the functions available from the admindb CGI don't
work. They didn't in 2.1-8 either. There seems to be no error log I
can locate. I
Hi,
I created an "announce-only" mailing list with every subscriber being
moderated so that only we could post to the list.
This is the configuration:
Privacy Option -> Sender filters
default_member_moderation = yes
member_moderation_action = reject
generic_nomember_action = reject
Of Course a
19-Dec-03 at 14:09, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
> Not really looking for sermons on HTML email here. 100% of my users have
> HTML email because they opted in as HTML email and have been receiving it
> for quite some time. It is a long forgotten idea that people don't have
> HTML
21 matches
Mail list logo
