Shame on me. I didn't read the FAQ thoroughly enough:
Q. I want to get rid of some messages in my archive. How do I do this?
A. David Rocher posts the following recipe:
# remove $prefix/archives/private/listname
# edit $prefix/archives/private/listname.mbox/listname.mbox [optional]
# run $prefix/
Ah. We're on 2.0.13!
I think I read that 2.1.2 is the latest "stable" release. Has that now
been upgraded to 2.1.3?
We just started using Mailman. Is an upgrade from where I'm at to 2.1.x
going to be pretty straightforward?
Thx,
Allan
--
I really like the way Mailman is configured
here: mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users. Users can add their
real name (optionally). And when they change email addresses, it allows
them to CHANGE, not unsub and resub (the way my own list works). I'd like
to add these two features t
I need to clean up a private archive, and followed the instructions someone
posted in a previous thread here: edited the mbox file to remove the
messages not wanted in the archive, deleted the html files in the
/2003 directory, and then ran ./arch .
It recreates the html files (except for the
On Fri, Oct 03, 2003 at 07:07:54PM -0400, Jon Carnes wrote:
> This would be a fairly simple hack to the source. You would simply grep
> for the option you want to comment out and when you find it in the
> source, comment it out. Then it won't appear in the web pages (that
> would be for every li
This would be a fairly simple hack to the source. You would simply grep
for the option you want to comment out and when you find it in the
source, comment it out. Then it won't appear in the web pages (that
would be for every list).
On Fri, 2003-10-03 at 18:31, Will Yardley wrote:
> Is there an
Is it possible to change the "public" email address of a list (that
reported in the rfc2369 headers, message footers, etc.) while
maintaining a different name internally? Would there be any obvious
problems I'm missing with such a feature?
For our virtually hosted lists, we need independent namesp
Is there an option to disable mass-subscription from the web interface,
so that users can't add non-confirmed addresses themselves?
Is there an option to require re-confirmation for addresses added (I
guess only allowing "invite" but not "subscribe" would take care of
this.
Lastly, is there a way
Jon Carnes escribió:
Ah-Ha!
Sounds like you have a mailman list subscribed to *your* list. Take a
look at your list membership and see if one of the subscribed emails is
going back to the server.
Happy hunting!
Jon Carnes
I manually send a mail to every subscriber of the list, and I didn't ge
I have some internal mailing lists that are trying to be closed (only
members can post without moderator approval).
Unfortunately, we have different email addresses for internal
vs. external mail, and our Exchange (:-/) server rewrites our addresses
for mail we send internally to be from the inter
On Fri, 2003-10-03 at 12:01, Jerry Spaulding wrote:
> I upgraded python to version 2.2.2. Now, for _every_ message that hits any
> of our lists, we get an entry in the error file of something like:
> Oct 03 11:48:00 2003 (712) lost data files for filebase:
> 1065106187.152128+c53e6c32d2697be42fa4
Hi Jon
The solution was finally simple, i renamed the error file to some other
name and my web interface came up and i approved the tons of list mails.
Thanks a lot for you help
Regards
Ganeshh
Jon Carnes wrote:
If I recall correctly, the next step is to look in the qfiles directory
and move an
I upgraded python to version 2.2.2. Now, for _every_ message that hits any
of our lists, we get an entry in the error file of something like:
Oct 03 11:48:00 2003 (712) lost data files for filebase:
1065106187.152128+c53e6c32d2697be42fa4c19addd64fc104d934a7
The messages still get out, but really,
I am using Mailman 2.1.2. All the lists I have the Archive link takes
me to a link link http://lists.serverone.co.uk/pipermail/bfm/ and I get
the error 'The requested URL /pipermail/bfm/ was not found on this
server.'. A friend of mine also has similar problems. Is this a known
issue with a work
If I recall correctly, the next step is to look in the qfiles directory
and move any files in there into a backup directory. Then test to see
if a new message goes through.
If that works, you can feed the waiting files back into that directory a
few at a time and let them be delivered. At some p
Hi Jon
I did the steps as you mentioned, i dont find any such process ids or
lock files under locks directory...
check_perms gave result as No Errors Found.
The problem persists, what should i do next
Regards
Ganeshh
Jon Carnes wrote:
You might consider upgrading to version 2.0.13...
It's be
In their infinite wisdom, DirecWay/DirecPC appear to be using a program that
rejects VERP'd from addresses.
The non-VERP'd messages are delivered by exim...
2003-10-03 08:38:38 1A5Q8F-0005zh-00 => [EMAIL PROTECTED] R=lookuphost
T=remote_smtp H=mx1.direcpc.com [66.82.4.72] C="250 2.5.0 Ok. (relaye
You might consider upgrading to version 2.0.13...
It's been quite awhile since I played with 2.0.8, but it looks like a
locking problem. You might want to check for any older lock files that
are still in the ~mailman/locks directory. If there are, the lock files
have the number of the running proc
Hi all
I had a server crashed yesterday and i recovered my mail server running
on exim with mailman 2.0.8 which has over 50 mailing list.
There was too many mails in the mailman queue and i ran them manually
and cleared. Since its a moderated list, when i got to the web interface
for approval
19 matches
Mail list logo
