I was trying to stop an outgoing message and wasn't quite sure where to do
it. I deleted two files in the qfiles/commands directory which seemed to
be relevant, but it was too late, the message was on its way out.
I've accepted that fact, now my questions are:
1) What problems could I have cau
One more question, if people will bear with me
My Postfix mailserver answers (for now) to both smtp.babcom.com and
smtp.caerllewys.net, and accepts mail for both. Apache likewise serves
both www.babcom.com and www.caerllewys.net. I want my lists to have mail
addresses such as [EMAIL PROTECT
- I create a new list
- Subscribe my self to the list
- Send a test message
- Mass subscribe 50 email addresses to the new list
- Send a message
It never arrives and it shunted. I checked the error log and I get this.
This is a little frustrating as new lists work but fail the moment I add
new use
Hmmm Now that is a good question!
I assume you tried copying the heldmsg files back into the data
directory and then running the web-admindb (and that didn't work?)
If so then try sending a message to the list that would be held for
moderation and then replace the heldmsg-...pck file that is
Right on! I'll inquire to see if I can get this done.
C.
On 21 Feb 2003, Jon Carnes wrote:
> This is a feature of Mailman version 2.1. Upgrade to version 2.1.1
>
> On Fri, 2003-02-21 at 02:57, Spam Collector wrote:
> >
> > Hello..
> > Anyone know of a way to do a "reject all"? My lists get
Thanks, I am aware of the FAQ, and the process that you suggested,
however I am not the owner of the machine, IE I run the lists via the
gui, , but do not have command line access. Ideally I thought this forum
would be the best place to ask, and sugest that in the "held messages"
area there be
FYI,
>From the latest EFF mailer...
-Barry
snip snip
* Mailing List Headaches? Contact us.
EFF believes that delivery of legitimate e-mail needs to be carefully
protected as a fundamental part of any solution to the spam problem.
Unfortunately, we've la
I finally got Mailman-2.1.1 doing what I want, but a certain amount of
trial and error in the data directory was involved. It appears if you
have a umask set when you install it, you will end up with incorrect and
non-working permissions on data/aliases and data/aliases.db.
--
.* Figh
--On Friday, February 21, 2003 21:42:50 -0300 Jorge Godoy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Hi!
I have apache running on port 8080 and when I try using the
administrative interface for, e.g., creating a mailing list, it
redirects or try accessing port 80. Mailman isn't keeping the ":8080"
after the d
Hi!
I have apache running on port 8080 and when I try using the
administrative interface for, e.g., creating a mailing list, it
redirects or try accessing port 80. Mailman isn't keeping the ":8080"
after the domain name.
Is it a bug of mine or from Mailman's code?
TIA,
--
Godoy. <[EMAIL PR
Hi. One of the list-admins at my site was testing the bulk-subscription
box under Mailman 2.1, and tried to subscribe an address that looked
like (as he described it to me)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Foo Bar)
but there must have been a tab in there because (according to
mm_list_members) the addres
Hi,
I just upgraded my mailman 2.0.13 install to 2.1.1 by downloading and
installing from source. The previous version worked fine. However,
2.1.1 has a major issue with subscription messages. Every time someone
subscribes to a list, mailman sends them a mailing list subscription
confirmation no
So, i wanted to re build my web archives... Running:
bin/arch --wipe listname
did a bunch of work and then (python 2.1 from debian):
Pickling archive state into /var/lib/mailman/archives/private/kiwi/pipermail.pck
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "bin/arch", line 187, in ?
main()
hmm, no, USE_CRYPT=0 did not work.
I am using 2.1 full version.
Maybe there is a way to convert the user database to the current format?
_andreas.
- Original Message -
From: "Jon Carnes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Andreas Moxnes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Mailman users Mailing list" <[EMAIL
Interesting... That is not supposed to happen in version 2.1 (are you
running the full version or one of the betas?)
>From the archives come wisdom in form of words from Barry:
===
I'm guessing somewhere along the way Python got upgraded and the
status of the crypt libraries changed (either they w
This is a feature of Mailman version 2.1. Upgrade to version 2.1.1
On Fri, 2003-02-21 at 02:57, Spam Collector wrote:
>
> Hello..
> Anyone know of a way to do a "reject all"? My lists get a ton of spam,
> and it gets old selected reject over and over..
>
> Thanks!
>
> C.
>
-
A couple of folks have done this and they needed to use
~mailman/bin/fix_url.py to modify the url's inside the configurations of
their existing lists in order for it work. You may also need to modify
the default urls in ~mailman/Mailman/mm_cfg.py
Note: a redirect to the port will not work as the
I have mailman setup with two virtual domains. Emails seem to work
fine, but authentication on one of the virtual domains does not work.
Primary: www.rupa.com/mailman/... works fine
virtual: list.gurukuli.com/mailman/... doens't.
The symptom is that I can "login" on the virtual, but any action a
On Thu, 2003-02-20 at 19:14, Phil Stracchino wrote:
> I think I may be trying to do something unsupported.
No. It is supported, and a common occurrence. Feel free to read the
archives.
>
> I just upgraded my Mailman installation from v2.0.6 to v2.1.1, and at
> the same time I'm preparing to
Apples and Oranges?
When I set the list to no monthly reminders (Web-Admin/general) then
that stays set - even after I add folks to the list. Is it changing for
you?
When I add folks to the list (Web-Admin/members/add), there is the
option to send them a "welcome message", but there is no indivi
> >I am upgrading to 2.1 now from 2.0.13
> >a couple of questions
> >How safe is it to install into the previuos mailman directory
> > (/home/mailman)? If I do not install in the old directory how easy is it
> > to copy my lists across?
>
> I upgraded my production MM 2.0.13 to MM 2.1 (and later th
* Spam Collector ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Anyone know of a way to do a "reject all"? My lists get a ton of spam,
> and it gets old selected reject over and over..
Check FAQ 1.12
> Mailman FAQ: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py
--
Matthew Davis
http://dogpound.vnet.net/
Thesaurus:
We set the count to 90k and daily which results in one digest 99.9% of the
time. I do appreciate that people on slow connections might prefer smaller
digests, but then they could get individual messages or read the mail
selectively via a web interface. I suspect most people on this list are on
In logic class we learned that the opposite of: A or B
was: not(A) and not(B)
The "or" changes to "and"
HtH - Jon Carnes
On Thu, 2003-02-20 at 14:04, Jeff Hahn wrote:
> I'm playing with topics to see how they work.
>
> I want to hold any message that doesn't match an existing topic.
>
> (actu
What version of Mailman are you using? (it looks like one of the 2.1.x
versions).
Hope you have already fixed this by now, but just in case, here is
something you can try. Look in the data directory for Mailman - this is
where the held messages are stored. You can actually scan the heldmsg
file
Hi!
I have apache listening on port 8080 here, so I access the mailman
interface as http://server.home.com:8080/mailman/ -- this works just
fine but then my problems start. Every link I click links correctly to
the page, except for the port number on the URL. It prevents me from
using the webint
Warren,
How do you set up digests on the lists you run?
Because the related question is why the Mailman 2.1 defaults are to send
a digest when it hits a certain size (30 K).
I can't speak for Barry, but in deference to people with slow email
access, keeping the size of each digest down makes i
Alan,
This works, though it is not exactly what you are asking for.
Set up multiple accounts for each person, with every variation of email
address you expect to receive. Then set all but one of them to "nomail".
This allows them to be recognized as members while still only receiving
one copy
Just out of curiosity, I get several digests a day from this list. The
'norm' for digests (elsewhere) is to send digests daily (unless size is
extraordinary). If that isn't fast enough, users can select regular
delivery or regularly review the archives for responses to their messages.
Was sendi
At 09:16 21/02/2003, david.gordon wrote:
I want to go from 2.0.13 to 2.1.1. I (think I) understand I need to
install 2.1 then move my current list archives etc over to the new
directory. Its all in the documents!
First, you can go directly from 2.0.13 to 2.1.1. There is no need to do the
upgrad
I want to go from 2.0.13 to 2.1.1. I (think I) understand I need to
install 2.1 then move my current list archives etc over to the new
directory. Its all in the documents!
I don't understand this, what is the concept here? Don't I just rename
the new MM21 directory to the 'old' name and everything
20-Feb-03 at 23:27, Matthew Davis ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
> * Pawan Singh ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > Is there any way to hide the maling lists
>
> To make it not publicly advertized on the web page, set 'advertised' to 'No'
> on the "Privacy" page.
Pawan,
Great to see you on the list.
G
32 matches
Mail list logo
