Tom,
> At the risk of garnering another "that's not exactly what I asked," a 2.1
> patch was posted to Sourceforge to allow this, a couple of months ago.
That's a great answer.
Thanks!
Robin
---
www.LinuxMovies.org www.Film
Jon,
> > Can anyone answer my question as asked? Is it possible to use the
mailman
> > spam filtering capabilities on message bodies as well as headers?
> Let me speak more clearly to you: No.
No you can't answer, or no it can't be done? ;-)
Thanks anyway!
Robin
-
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Kathryn Bassett wrote:
> 2) Regardless of the answer to 1), is there some code that will keep
> "anything below this line" from ending up in the archived message?
> Example, I am on a betatesting list that has us include XXENDSXX on a line
> by itself.
Uhhh, you should remove that cron entry. Mailman version 2.1 does not use a
cron activated qrunner instead it runs a daemon called Mailmanctl.
In the upgrade instructions it tells you to remove the old cron entries
before putting in the new cron entries. BTW, why are you running the
mailman cron
After upgrading to MM 2.1, I am getting the following e-mail msg from Con
Daemon, one per minute:
Subject: Cron /usr/local/bin/python2.2 -S
/usr/local/mailman/cron/qrunner
X-Cron-Env:
X-Cron-Env:
X-Cron-Env:
X-Cron-Env:
X-Cron-Env:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/
Mailman is Open Source and you can easily modify the code to handle both of
those conditions. The module to modify would be
~mailman/Mailman/Archiver/HyperArch.py
I don't believe Mailman currently implements a No Archive option - though
I've never looked for one...
Take care - Jon Carnes
-
--On Wednesday, January 29, 2003 3:47 PM -0800 Robin Rowe
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Can anyone answer my question as asked? Is it possible to use the mailman
spam filtering capabilities on message bodies as well as headers?
At the risk of garnering another "that's not exactly what I asked," a 2
Let me speak more clearly to you: No.
- Original Message -
From: "Robin Rowe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Mailman users Mailing list" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 5:47 PM
Subject: Re: [Mailman-Users] spam filtering
> Jon,
>
> > Front-end your mailing lists with a pr
Alex,
> If you automatically reject any email which isn't from list members then
> you'll probably find 99.9% of your SPAM go away.
Thanks, but I already do that.
Can anyone answer my question as asked? Is it possible to use the mailman
spam filtering capabilities on message bodies as well as
On Wed, 29 Jan 2003, Mark Rauterkus wrote:
> How do you NUKE an address from ALL the lists on your server?
>
> Is there an Unsubscribe "ALL" trick?
>
> And, rather than looking at a dozen lists -- for one address -- is there a
> way to find out (as a SYSTEM ADMIN with Root) what lists an address is
On Wed, 29 Jan 2003, Robin Rowe wrote:
> Jon,
> > Front-end your mailing lists with a procmail filter that uses
> > SpamAssassin.
>
> Thanks, but as I said, I'm configuring mailman on a SourceForge-hosted
> mailing list. Installing SpamAssassin there is not within my power.
>
> Can anyone answer my
Hi,
How do you NUKE an address from ALL the lists on your server?
Is there an Unsubscribe "ALL" trick?
And, rather than looking at a dozen lists -- for one address -- is there a
way to find out (as a SYSTEM ADMIN with Root) what lists an address is
subscribed to???
- -
Presently I'm going list
Richard Barrett wrote:
At 18:21 29/01/2003, Simon White wrote:
29-Jan-03 at 12:11, Justin Georgeson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
> Aha! I just noticed that the archive link from
>
> https:///mailman/listinfo//
>
> is
>
> http:///pipermail//
>
> This may seem odd, and I'd rather not go into deta
Two part question.
1) I tried a test message with the first line being NO ARCHIVE but that did not keep
the message out of the archives of our list, as it does in some mailing list archives.
Is there some other phrase or way that DOES do the trick?
2) Regardless of the answer to 1), is there so
At 21:07 29/01/2003, jsingh wrote:
Hey guys
I wanted to know if any has been successfully running mailman on a
Compaq Tru64 machine. My boss just asked me to move over the entire
project on a tru64 machine?
Thanks
jack
If its runningTru64 UNIX and has/you-can-install Python the answer is
al
Jon,
> Front-end your mailing lists with a procmail filter that uses
> SpamAssassin.
Thanks, but as I said, I'm configuring mailman on a SourceForge-hosted
mailing list. Installing SpamAssassin there is not within my power.
Can anyone answer my question as asked? Is it possible to use the mailma
Hi there,
this may seem to you as a simple question, but I'd appreciate some help. I've run
mailman's configure-script with the option --with-cgi-gid=www and --with-mail-gid=-
2. Now when I'm trying to create a list via www with the create-script, I get the
error: RuntimeError: command failed: /
>What you don't know (because you've never done it before) is that
>installing via the Source is actually easier with Mailman than
>installing via the RPM.
>
>Installing via the RPM is buggy and only works if no default has been
>touched - plus you still need to do all the work that is associated w
Front-end your mailing lists with a procmail filter that uses
SpamAssassin.
On Wed, 2003-01-29 at 12:00, Robin Rowe wrote:
> By setting bounce_matching_headers I have mailman trapping some messages
> with content likely to be spam. This works really well, and I can approve
> the false positives to
hi,
i found it, i forgot to set the right values in
/var/mailman/Mailman/Defaults.py
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Im Auftrag von Alfred
> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 29. Jänner 2003 22:29
> An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Betreff: [Mailma
What you don't know (because you've never done it before) is that
installing via the Source is actually easier with Mailman than
installing via the RPM.
Installing via the RPM is buggy and only works if no default has been
touched - plus you still need to do all the work that is associated with
in
Hi,
i upgrade from 2.0 to 2.1 the command /var/mailman/bin/newlist
can not create a new list, over the web i like to create a new list
called test but after click the create button it shows me the error:
Error: Illegal list name: test@mail
but i dont fill a @ in the form and from where comes "@mai
Tell apache to allow symlinks for that directory
Does your Sendmail use "smrsh" to protect it? If so you will need to
follow the steps in FAQ 3.14 to setup smrsh to allow Mailman.
The sendmail problem could also be the GID of the Sendmail you are using
verses the mail-GID that you configured Mai
If you can get shell access to the server you can use the
~mailman/bin/genaliases command to generate the aliases for your created
lists. You could simply redirect the output of that command into a
local aliases file and then include that aliases file in your MTA's list
of aliases that it checks.
Your current host should be able to send you the config.db file for each
of your lists. Using that you can simply install the same version of
mailman, create the same listnames, then copy in the config.db files.
After which you will need to use the with-list command to modify the
hostnames in the
If you have an old cookie from Mailman 2.0.x, you'll have to re-login
for every page until you manually clear the cookie from your browser
(after upgrading to 2.1).
Is there any way to fix this in the future? With some browsers, it's not
simple to remove an individual cookie.
--
"Since when is s
What does the pending.pck file do?
--
Mailman-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailm
#
# httpd configuration settings for use with mailman.
#
ScriptAlias /mailman/ /var/mailman/cgi-bin/
Alias /pipermail/ /var/mailman/archives/public/
Options +FollowSymlinks
#
# Uncomment, and replace www.example.com with your server's
# name, to redirect queries to
Richard Barrett wrote:
At 19:44 29/01/2003, Marc Perkel wrote:
I think it was working and quit. I upgraded to Mailman 2.1 and I
can't admin pending messages. It shows the pending messages with the
choices - but if I select to approve, reject, or discard - nothing
happens after I click subm
Hey guys
I wanted to know if any has been successfully running mailman on a
Compaq Tru64 machine. My boss just asked me to move over the entire
project on a tru64 machine?
Thanks
jack
--
Mailman-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://m
At 19:44 29/01/2003, Marc Perkel wrote:
I think it was working and quit. I upgraded to Mailman 2.1 and I can't
admin pending messages. It shows the pending messages with the choices -
but if I select to approve, reject, or discard - nothing happens after I
click submit. The same messages are st
cd /var/spool/cron
grep qrunner *
On Tue, 2003-01-28 at 17:27, Parker, David K wrote:
> Hmmm, the earlier RPM install must be running cron jobs as a different user?
> I've removed crontab entries for mailman but the messages are still flowing.
> How can trace this back to the correct user?
>
At 20:19 29/01/2003, Marc Perkel wrote:
Where are the pending messages stored?
For MM 2.1, try looking in £prefix/data
--
Mailman-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ: http:/
At 18:21 29/01/2003, Simon White wrote:
29-Jan-03 at 12:11, Justin Georgeson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
> Aha! I just noticed that the archive link from
>
> https:///mailman/listinfo//
>
> is
>
> http:///pipermail//
>
> This may seem odd, and I'd rather not go into detail, but
> http:// and https
Where are the pending messages stored?
--
Mailman-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/m
Since upgrading to 2.1, I notice that instead of:
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Realname [EMAIL PROTECTED], "John Q. Doe" [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The headers appear as:
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Realname [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: "John Q. Doe" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Is thi
Okay, I give--what source changes do I need to make to alter the default
headers?
> If you are a sysadmin on the server, you can modify the source to leave
> that out...
>
> On Fri, 2003-01-24 at 11:39, VLists.Net Support wrote:
> > -> On 12:22 PM 1/23/2003 -0800, Tom Maddox was quoted as saying..
I was incorrect in my earlier statement. On my RedHat 7.3 box with Postfix
1.7 installed via RPM is running as postfix.
Thanks,
David
-Original Message-
From: Justin Georgeson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 10:30 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Mailma
Will Nordmeyer wrote:
Upon further review...
My apache server is complaining, when I go to
www.sitename.com/pipermail/listname, with the following error:
Symbolic link not allowed: /home/mailman/archives/public/listname/
Is www.sitename.com the server's hostname, or the ServerName of the
Vir
I think it was working and quit. I upgraded to Mailman 2.1 and I can't admin
pending messages. It shows the pending messages with the choices - but if I
select to approve, reject, or discard - nothing happens after I click submit.
The same messages are still there and still pending.
What am I d
Upon further review...
My apache server is complaining, when I go to
www.sitename.com/pipermail/listname, with the following error:
Symbolic link not allowed: /home/mailman/archives/public/listname/
I tried replacing it with a hard link and the cobalt didn't really like it.
Is there a way to al
dear all,
i set up a mailman list a long time ago with reply-to munging enabled.
i'd rather not change that, because i foresee a billion emails "why
aren't my emails going to the list anymore"?
normally, sent email doesn't contain "reply-to:" unless the
user specifically sets it.
is there a way
29-Jan-03 at 12:11, Justin Georgeson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
> Aha! I just noticed that the archive link from
>
> https:///mailman/listinfo//
>
> is
>
> http:///pipermail//
>
> This may seem odd, and I'd rather not go into detail, but
> http:// and https:// are different VirtualHost
> con
Aha! I just noticed that the archive link from
https:///mailman/listinfo//
is
http:///pipermail//
This may seem odd, and I'd rather not go into detail, but
http:// and https:// are different VirtualHost
configurations in my Apache installation. If I type in the same archive
URL with a https
hi,
now i upgrade to version 2.1 but i can not find in the configuration
for "turn on Personalization"
please can anyone tell me where i can find this configuration point
thanks
Alfred
>Jon Carnes jonc at nc.rr.com
>Wed Jan 29 01:04:58 EST 2003
>You want each mail that goes out to list the in
29-Jan-03 at 11:43, Bobby and Denise ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
> The reason I don't need the list after one message is that a merketing
> company, my client, manages many sub-lists, say sublists 1-10, and for any
> given mailer they may want to use a combination of lists 1,4, and 5, or
> li
The RPM from RawHide isn't supported on RedHat 7.3 (or technically
anywhere, since RawHide is the beta distro). RedHat 7.3 has
/usr/bin/python (a 1.x binary from the 'python') and /usr/bin/python2 (a
2.x binary from the 'python2'). I had to configure the spec file to
depend on the python2 packa
22-Jan-03 at 19:05, Jim Hale ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
> Why does that happen though? As far as I know the people are just
> putting the address of the list in their TO: Box and not the BBC: Box.
> :/
>
> Also - you wouldn't happen to know how to change the size limit of
> messages allowed to th
Why does that happen though? As far as I know the people are just
putting the address of the list in their TO: Box and not the BBC: Box.
:/
Also - you wouldn't happen to know how to change the size limit of
messages allowed to the list from 100K to 200K?
Thanks!! :)
Jim Hale
---
'The OS Tells Th
> Simon White wrote:
> >29-Jan-03 at 10:30, Justin Georgeson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
> >
> >>I have the latest package from RedHat (2.1-7) running on RedHat 7.3 over
> >>Postfix 1.7. I had to change the spec file slightly (use postfix and
> >>python2 instead of sendmail and python), and can g
See my previous post. :)
Simon White wrote:
29-Jan-03 at 10:30, Justin Georgeson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
I have the latest package from RedHat (2.1-7) running on RedHat 7.3 over
Postfix 1.7. I had to change the spec file slightly (use postfix and
python2 instead of sendmail and python), a
By setting bounce_matching_headers I have mailman trapping some messages
with content likely to be spam. This works really well, and I can approve
the false positives to go through. I would like to check not just headers
but the message body. There are a few phrases that would be good to catch
ther
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Simon White wrote:
> Funny that they should miss the key dependency: Mailman requires
> python2...
They don't, the requires line from the rawhide rpm is:
Requires: webserver, python >= 2.2.1, mktemp
Apparently rawhide uses python-2 by default in
They didn't miss it, the RPM is aimed at RedHat 8, which has python 2.
RedHat 7.3 has two packages, python and python2, so you have to build it
using /usr/bin/python2 instead of /usr/bin/python (--with-python option
to configure)
Simon White wrote:
29-Jan-03 at 10:30, Justin Georgeson ([EMAIL P
From: Marc Haber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Mailman-Users] [Mailman 2.1] Is it possible to pre-approve a
message?
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
MIME-Version: 1.0
Precedence: list
Message: 11
Hi,
we have a mailing list of custom
29-Jan-03 at 10:30, Justin Georgeson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
> I have the latest package from RedHat (2.1-7) running on RedHat 7.3 over
> Postfix 1.7. I had to change the spec file slightly (use postfix and
> python2 instead of sendmail and python), and can give anyone who wants
> it a diff.
Run the mailman daemon:
~mailman/bin/mailmanctl start
On Tue, 2003-01-28 at 14:52, Paul Daniel wrote:
> Greetings:
>
> I'm trying to get mailman 2.1 to work with postfix 2.0.2 on RedHat 7.2. I am able
> to create lists and add subscribers using the mass-subscription but list owners
> and subsc
I have the latest package from RedHat (2.1-7) running on RedHat 7.3 over
Postfix 1.7. I had to change the spec file slightly (use postfix and
python2 instead of sendmail and python), and can give anyone who wants
it a diff. The [beta] packages are available here:
ftp://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat
Will Nordmeyer wrote:
I tried sending e-mail to the new list I created this AM...
I emailed @domain.com...
I got the following error returned:
sh: mailman not available for sendmail programs
554 "|/home/mailman/mail/mailman post listname"... Service unavailable
Also, I can't access the archi
On Wed, 2003-01-29 at 03:50, Bobby and Denise wrote:
> I'm building a web application in PHP to upload multiple mailing lists
> via text files and merge the addresses (eliminate duplicates) to create
> a single list. This final list will reside in my web db, and can have
> up to 50,000 email addre
IMHO, If I may
I started to go on about the advantages in using a mailing list server such as
Mailman (It *rocks* !) but the most valuable advantage in your case would be
the efficientcy in which Mailman would send your 50,000 emails...
As as ISP, Mailman is the only way we would allow this am
29-Jan-03 at 15:37, Tom ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
> Ahh, thank you,
>
> The messages are sent TO the list and CCd to an internal (Groupwise)
> distribution list. The internal list contained a subset of those on the
> list as well as a few others. So I guess the GW MTA should notice that
> a
Ahh, thank you,
The messages are sent TO the list and CCd to an internal (Groupwise)
distribution list. The internal list contained a subset of those on the
list as well as a few others. So I guess the GW MTA should notice that
and only give us two copies ... anyway, not to worry, if it is on
29-Jan-03 at 09:27, Parker, David K ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
> Apparently the RPM was set expect Postfix MTA to run as mail. I'm guessing
> the RedHat standard is to run MTA as nobody. I do appreciate the efforts of
> the person who put the rpm out. I've got the list back up on another RedHat
>
At 14:12 29/01/2003, Tom wrote:
Simon White wrote:
>29-Jan-03 at 12:26, Tom ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
>
>
>>Hi All,
>>
>>I've had a quick search thru the list archives and can't find any
>>problems that exactly match mine.
>>
>>Basically, any emails from a company 'N' to one of our lists cause
Apparently the RPM was set expect Postfix MTA to run as mail. I'm guessing
the RedHat standard is to run MTA as nobody. I do appreciate the efforts of
the person who put the rpm out. I've got the list back up on another RedHat
7.x box with Redhat distro Mailman RPM 2.0x. I'm thinking I'll wait unti
I tried sending e-mail to the new list I created this AM...
I emailed @domain.com...
I got the following error returned:
sh: mailman not available for sendmail programs
554 "|/home/mailman/mail/mailman post listname"... Service unavailable
Also, I can't access the archives... I have 2 issues th
29-Jan-03 at 15:15, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
> Helo mailman users,
> how can I change all member-passwords of an existing list to the same?
> I don't want to do that by the webfrontend because I have to change a
> lot of passwords and all members should get the same!
-- withli
29-Jan-03 at 14:12, Tom ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
> Once the mail comes back to our main mail server (Groupwise), the logs
> show one incoming message from the list admin to each local member of
> the list, which I guess is what you would expect.
> I'm on the list and I get 11 copies (not includ
Helo mailman users,
how can I change all member-passwords of an existing list to the same? I don't want to
do that by the webfrontend because I have to change a lot of passwords and all members
should get the same!
Thanks, Peter
___
Simon White wrote:
>29-Jan-03 at 12:26, Tom ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
>
>
>>Hi All,
>>
>>I've had a quick search thru the list archives and can't find any
>>problems that exactly match mine.
>>
>>Basically, any emails from a company 'N' to one of our lists cause
>>duplicate messages. It always
Hello all,
I didn't get an answer to my question on how to (easily) set the next digest
number. The solution that I used was just force the send of dummy digests and
delete the complete archives.
Now for some other questions:
1) digests and headers
how do I prevent the following headers from
Hi,
we have a mailing list of customers that we use to send out
announcements about service problems, bad lines and general
information. Nobody should be able to send e-mail to that list except
the people allowed to do so. Since e-mail senders are easily forged,
we have currently set all list memb
29-Jan-03 at 12:26, Tom ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
> Hi All,
>
> I've had a quick search thru the list archives and can't find any
> problems that exactly match mine.
>
> Basically, any emails from a company 'N' to one of our lists cause
> duplicate messages. It always seems to be 11 copies f
Hi All,
I've had a quick search thru the list archives and can't find any
problems that exactly match mine.
Basically, any emails from a company 'N' to one of our lists cause
duplicate messages. It always seems to be 11 copies for some reason.
All the message ids are the same, only one messag
29-Jan-03 at 11:58, Simon White ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
> I saw an error on the HTTPS site too, a Traceback with different params,
> but I can't reproduce it so I won't bother y'all with it now
Here it is:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/home/mailman/scripts/driver", line 87, in r
Hello
I was running Mailman 2.1b6, I just upgraded because I was having some
problems. I always get the latest before coming to a list (I'm new here,
just point me to some FAQ or other).
First of all the UPGRADING file doesn't cover from 2.1bN to 2.1final,
but that's minor. I fly by the seat of m
Hi,
I'm using mailman 2.1 on a Cobalt RAQ3 and trying to use the web
interface to create a list.
It creates the list, but doesn't add any entries to either the aliases
file or the virtusertable. It also doesn't provide a list of what
entries need to be added.
It doesn't seem that I have ev
I use Mailman as part of a website hosting package to host a discussion list
with 750 active subscribers, with up to 30 messages a day. My host recently
told me that the list is generating too much traffic. So I need to move the
list
I have another host which uses EZMLM. They've told me that this
I've installed mailman from source (took John's advice) with --configure
--prefix=/var/lib/mailman --with-mail-gid=78 --with-cgi-gid=72 (which was obtained
from grep apache /etc/groups.
I've also run ./check_perms -f, which then showed no problems.
Put in ScriptAlias /mailman/ /var
80 matches
Mail list logo
