Re[2]: [Mailman-Users] Re: autorespond_requests in 2.1x

2002-12-30 Thread Mark Geisinger
On Tuesday, December 31, 2002, 12:30:45 AM, you wrote: > And we've had in 2.0.x subscribers fail to confirm because (as of 2.0.6, > anyhow), the request could easily be misread as an acknowledgement. We hacked > the message a little to make it more obvious. (Old news now.) Darn pesky users. ;} I

Re: [Mailman-Users] Re: autorespond_requests in 2.1x

2002-12-30 Thread John W Baxter
At 22:35 -0600 12/30/2002, Mark Geisinger wrote: >My point is a) that traffic for subscription confirms is redundant, and b) >it's >actually confusing subscribers. Since moving from v2.0.13, where this behavior >didn't exist, I've actually had a number of folks miss the purpose of the >subscription

Re: [Mailman-Users] Re: autorespond_requests in 2.1x

2002-12-30 Thread Mark Geisinger
Sunday, December 29, 2002, 2:06:27 PM, you wrote: >> "MG" == Mark Geisinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > MG> Is autorespond_requests broken in 2.1x, or do I perhaps > MG> misunderstand its purpose? I'm using 2.1b4 and would like to > MG> avoid having a request autoresponse sent t

[Mailman-Users] read-only mailing list?

2002-12-30 Thread Lukas Ruf
Dear all, I do not understand how to configure a read only mailing list with 2.1rc1. Thanks for any hint! Lukas -- Lukas Ruf http://www.lpr.ch Wanna know anything about raw ip? Join [EMAIL PROTECTED] on http://www.rawip.org -- Mailman-Users

Re: [Mailman-Users] Re: cAse SeNsiTiVe

2002-12-30 Thread Barry A. Warsaw
> "J" == JMD <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: J> Maybe it's the version. Mine is version 2.0.13 and what do you J> have? I'm only dealing with MM2.1 issues now -- it's more than enough to keep my plate quite full. -Barry -- Mailman-Us

Re: [Mailman-Users] Re: cAse SeNsiTiVe

2002-12-30 Thread JMD
Maybe it's the version. Mine is version 2.0.13 and what do you have? -- Mailman-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users Mailman FAQ: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py Searchable Archives:

[Mailman-Users] 2.1rc1 -- howto for virtual hosts

2002-12-30 Thread Lukas Ruf
Dear all, is there anywhere a how to that exlains in a step-by-step manner how to setup mailing lists for virtual hosts? I assume that the add_virtualhost('host') is sufficient to cope with the different virtual hosts. But how can I do the following: My scenario: - I have a few domains -

[Mailman-Users] Re: MM 2.1rc1 Virtual hosting

2002-12-30 Thread David Gibbs
"Barry A. Warsaw" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > DG> Any ideas why the reply-to, send, errors-to, etc, all have > DG> 'midrange.com' instead of 'lists.fallingrock.net'? > Your MTA is probably munging them. Thanks! That's what I needed t

Re: [Mailman-Users] MM 2.0.13 > Footer variables.

2002-12-30 Thread Barry A. Warsaw
> "MT" == Marco Trevisan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: MT> There are some variable I lost or still I don't know, or it's MT> a feature that is not available on 2.0.13 version? It's not possible in MM2.0, but it is in MM2.1. -Barry --

Re: [Mailman-Users] MM 2.1rc1 Virtual hosting

2002-12-30 Thread Barry A. Warsaw
> "DG" == David Gibbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: DG> Any ideas why the reply-to, send, errors-to, etc, all have DG> 'midrange.com' instead of 'lists.fallingrock.net'? Your MTA is probably munging them. -Barry -- Mailman-Users mail

[Mailman-Users] MM 2.1rc1 Virtual hosting

2002-12-30 Thread David Gibbs
I'm trying to setup virtual hosting on a test install of MM 2.1 rc1 ... my default list host is "midrange.com", and the virtual is "lists.fallingrock.net". I've setup a virtual hosted list with the 'lists.fallingrock.net' domain, but when I send a message to the list I get odd results. Some of th