On Mon, 26 Nov 2001 00:48:12 -0700
Ashley M Kirchner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That would mean having to log you out on that page (or upon
> clicking on those links).
I would prefer it didn't log me out (actually that would both annoy
me and destroy the utility of the feature).
--
J C La
J C Lawrence wrote:
> > That last line is a link back to /admin/ - is that not
> > what you want?
>
> Nope. I want a link back to .../listinfo/ and/or .../admin/
That would mean having to log you out on that page (or upon clicking on those
links). When that page gets displayed, you're sti
On Mon, 26 Nov 2001 00:30:35 -0700
Ashley M Kirchner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> J C Lawrence wrote:
>> However there is no link back to the /admin or /listinfo pages,
>> which is unfortunate.
> Hrm, maybe it's just me then, but after I'm done with whatever
> administrative tasks needed to be
J C Lawrence wrote:
> However there is no link back to the /admin or /listinfo pages,
> which is unfortunate.
Hrm, maybe it's just me then, but after I'm done with whatever administrative
tasks needed to be done (/mailman/admindb/), I get a page back that looks like
this:
Database Updated
Thanks,
I think the best way for a backup is to backup mailmans data self.
Extract all members, extract lists coniguration via "config_list".
If the MM DB became corropted, it should be easy to recover
it.
regards
Oliver
> Just a reminder, but it is important to backup your Mailman files on
On Sun, 25 Nov 2001 20:35:27 -0700
Ashley M Kirchner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "J. Barnes" wrote:
>> When I login to the administrative mode for a mailing list and
>> click on "tend to pendingadministrative requests", after I click
>> the submit changes button, I'm at a dead-end type screen.
Hi folks! I've got mailman throwing up the "we've hit a bug page" on a
set of archives for me pretty consistently. The python traceback says
something about "OverflowError: integer multiplication" (I've included
the whole output below). It's showing up in gzip.py, but these archives
aren't espe
"J. Barnes" wrote:
> When I login to the administrative mode for a mailing list and click on
> "tend to pendingadministrative requests", after I click the submit changes
> button, I'm at a dead-end type screen. Shouldn't this screen have the
> standard set of links for Configuration Categories a
I very recently upgraded my server, in the process I went from exim to
sendmail, I went from redhat 7.0 to redhat 7.2 I re-formatted the drive and
restored the mailman files from the backup. I appear to have a problem of
some sort with the archiving.
can someone tell me how to diagnose this pro
I keep bumping into the same annoying thing with Mailman and was wondering
how I go about suggesting a feature. I'll describe the situation here, and
perhaps someone can tell me if I'm doing something wrong or whatever.
When I login to the administrative mode for a mailing list and click on
"
Hello,
I am new to mailman, so bear with me. I have downloaded mailman-2.0.7 which
works fine, than I have tried mailman 2.1 (also from cvs), and getting error
message below in error log whenever I try to send email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with word help in Subject line (I have tried also
word help
Hi,
Trying hard to figure this out myself :-( I was able to find a number of
posts with this same problem, but no solutions.
I wonder if I don't understand sguid very well.
mailman 2.0.7, python 1.5.2. Sendmail 8.10.1
Linux mardy 2.2.13 #1 Mon Nov 8 15:51:29 CET 1999 i686 unknown
(ya, time fo
Hi folks,
I've just installed 2.0.7 to take over the running of mailing lists here.
At the moment we have archives done by digest for those lists which have
archives. I like the pipermail interface and don't want to replace it
completely, but the weekly mailboxes are likely to be pretty large f
> "DC" == David Calafrancesco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
DC> I have checked the archives of this list, at least as far back
DC> as a few months, as well as other docs and FAQs and don't see
DC> anyone addressing automating list creation.
Mailman 2.1 has this feature.
-Barry
-
> "PT" == Paul Tomblin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
PT> And I can't say I like the one minute delay before the mail
PT> actually goes out. Is there any way to eliminate the qrunner
PT> step and have it mail out immediately? I use a good MTA that
PT> is extremely fast and doe
On Sun, Nov 25, 2001 at 02:35:14PM +0100, Jonas Meurer wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 24, 2001 at 10:43:18PM -0500, Jon Carnes wrote:
> > ~mailman/Mailman/mm_cfg.py
> > Look in Default.py for more details.
> Ok, I've found that.
But it doesn't work:
Now the qrunner-cronjob sends the following message:
On Sat, Nov 24, 2001 at 10:43:18PM -0500, Jon Carnes wrote:
> ~mailman/Mailman/mm_cfg.py
> Look in Default.py for more details.
Ok, I've found that.
Bye
Jonas
--
|.-.| 2nd mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | jmeurer.dnsalias.org
|/v\| **
On Sat, Nov 24, 2001 at 10:38:48PM -0500, Jon Carnes wrote:
> Logon to your system that is running Mailman and try to access the same
> news server (using the password and username that you have setup in
> ~mailman/Mailman/mm_cfg.py).
>
> It looks like the server couldn't establish a socket con
18 matches
Mail list logo
