Re: [Mailman-Users] missing footer for html mail?

2001-10-25 Thread Barry A. Warsaw
> "GW" == Greg Ward <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: GW> I used to think this was a Mailman problem too. Read the HTML GW> email as plain text (so you see all the tags), and I bet GW> you'll see the footer. The problem is that Mailman just tacks GW> the footer on after the "" th

Re: [Mailman-Users] Old Question, New Twist

2001-10-25 Thread J C Lawrence
On Thu, 25 Oct 2001 15:46:18 -0400 David Pierron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I also decided on Sendmail because I want to host many domains > with their own "virtual" mail server ... I don't know if PostFix > will do this ... Exim, Postfix and QMail all support virtual domains quite well.

[Mailman-Users] Sendmail vs Postfix

2001-10-25 Thread Bob [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> I also decided on Sendmail because I want to host many domains with their > own "virtual" mail server ... I don't know if PostFix will do this > ... The recommendation to remove Postfix and install Sendmail came from > the book: Linux for Windows NT/2000 Administrators The Secret Decoder Ri

Re: [Mailman-Users] Shortening URLS

2001-10-25 Thread Michael H Moran
On Thu, Oct 25, 2001 at 06:15:02PM -0400, Greg Ward wrote: > On 25 October 2001, Michael H Moran said: > > Running mailman 2.0.6, on Linux with Apache, is there a way to > > shorten the URL to the listinfo page for a specific list ? > > > > i.e. http:///mailman/listinfo/ > > becomes > >

[Mailman-Users] RE: Mailman-Users digest, Vol 1 #1531 - 3 msgs

2001-10-25 Thread Alexis Bellido
Hi, i have put one html form on one of my web pages to subscribe to one list, just like from the list info page, what i want is that visitors just put their email and don't have to choose password. What i am doing now is putting the password fields hidden and passing a fixed value, also do this t

[Mailman-Users] Change default welcome message

2001-10-25 Thread Alexis Bellido
Hi i would like to know how i can change default welcome, confirmation and password reminder messages sent from mailman. I use mailman 2.0.6 and don't have root access to my hosting server. I also would like to know if i can use variables on those emails such as the email address of the subscribe

Re: [Mailman-Users] Analog to remove_members for nomail?

2001-10-25 Thread Jon Carnes
This is actually quite easy to do, but you will have to write your own scripts for it (or hire someone to do it for you), as this is not a function of Mailman. Check out the command line scripts in ~mailman/bin/... Run an hourly list of your active users out of /etc/passwd. Compare the new list

Re: [Mailman-Users] Question about umbrella lists

2001-10-25 Thread Jon Carnes
Phil, peruse the archives (for this month) and you will find all your questions answered. Below are some comments. - Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, October 22, 2001 5:20 PM Subject: [Mailman-Users] Question about umbrella lists > I've

Re: [Mailman-Users] mailman 2.0.6 problem

2001-10-25 Thread Jon Carnes
Deja vu all over again. I must have answered this question 4 times now in the past two weeks. Check to insure that your crontab is running all the mailman scripts. su mailman crontab -e you should see a full page of scripts kicking off (well a full page worth, with all the comments). In pa

[Mailman-Users] password request, subcribing hanging

2001-10-25 Thread John Masterson
Any ideas on this out there? Thanks. -- John Masterson Modwest Powerful, Affordable Hosting http://www.modwest.com 406-541-4678 - Original Message - From: "John Masterson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 8:13 PM Subject: [Mailman-Users] pas

Re: [Mailman-Users] Sendmail getting bum rap...

2001-10-25 Thread Ralph Forsythe
> >...if I need a Ph.D. and five feet of shelf space for the manuals > >required to make it run, I don't want it on my network... > That's what separates the "system engineers" from the "skr1pt k1d33s". ;-) I don't like needing 30 books just to make a program work, but most of the time that isn'

Re: [Mailman-Users] Archiving problem

2001-10-25 Thread Greg Ward
On 25 October 2001, leanne lai said: > Seems like the Mailman archiving function does not work properly with > mailx. When I use netscape mail or pipe or elm to reply to a mail > list, the archiving function seems to work fine ie it is indented. But > when I try to use mailx to reply, Mailman arc

Re: [Mailman-Users] Shortening URLS

2001-10-25 Thread Greg Ward
On 25 October 2001, Michael H Moran said: > Running mailman 2.0.6, on Linux with Apache, is there a way to > shorten the URL to the listinfo page for a specific list ? > > i.e. http:///mailman/listinfo/ > becomes >http:/// This should be doable with a simple RewriteRule. Try this:

[Mailman-Users] Archiving problem

2001-10-25 Thread leanne lai
Seems like the Mailman archiving function does not work properly with mailx. When I use netscape mail or pipe or elm to reply to a mail list, the archiving function seems to work fine ie it is indented. But when I try to use mailx to reply, Mailman archival function seems to treat it as a new

Re: [Mailman-Users] Old Question, New Twist

2001-10-25 Thread Greg Ward
On 25 October 2001, David Pierron said: > So what I'm getting here is that I should start the Mailman installation > all over again? Yes. It *sounds* like Mandrake's Mailman RPM is broken, so you'll have to build from source. > I did mention that a: find / -name configure - turned up nothing

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman and Courier

2001-10-25 Thread Greg Ward
On 25 October 2001, Billy Harvey said: > The syslog shows: > > Oct 24 21:57:15 maestro courieresmtpd: > error,relay=:::127.0.0.1,ident="list",msg="554 Syntax error - your > mail software violates RFC 821.",cmd: RCPT TO: > > The Courier FAQ says this error is usually due to the sending softwa

Re: [Mailman-Users] Sendmail getting bum rap...

2001-10-25 Thread Amanda
You're right, I'd have torn out all my hair and gone back to teaching things like the psychology of complex musical compositions. :-) =) Amanda "Derek J. Balling" wrote: > >...if I need a Ph.D. and five feet of shelf space for the manuals > >required to make it run, I don't want it on my netwo

Re: [Mailman-Users] Sendmail getting bum rap...

2001-10-25 Thread Derek J. Balling
>...if I need a Ph.D. and five feet of shelf space for the manuals >required to make it run, I don't want it on my network... Man, you would have never made it in the days of VAXen and the big {blue,orange,grey} walls ;-) D -- +-+-

[Mailman-Users] Mailman and Courier

2001-10-25 Thread Billy Harvey
I'm not subscribed, so please cc me any responses. I'm trying to use Mailman with the Courier MTA. Courier is extremely picky about compliance with various mail RFCs, and complains that when Mailman is trying to hand a message off to it that a non-compliant address is being given to it. The sys

Re: [Mailman-Users] Old Question, New Twist

2001-10-25 Thread David Pierron
So what I'm getting here is that I should start the Mailman installation all over again? I did mention that a: find / -name configure - turned up nothing on my system ... Do I have to acquire more software as well? Remember, I'm a Linux, Sendmail, Mailman newb ... although have been involved

[Mailman-Users] Shortening URLS

2001-10-25 Thread Michael H Moran
Running mailman 2.0.6, on Linux with Apache, is there a way to shorten the URL to the listinfo page for a specific list ? i.e. http:///mailman/listinfo/ becomes http:/// RTFM-ing, didn't provide any clues. Mike -- Mailman-Users m

Re: [Mailman-Users] Sendmail getting bum rap...

2001-10-25 Thread Jon Carnes
On Thursday 25 October 2001 13:48, Amanda wrote: > My fundamental issue with sendmail is that it's not intuitive. Sendmail is not intuitive. Very true, and a very good argument against its use. If you don't mind, I'll translate that statement into "Sendmail is overly complex and convuluted."

Re: [Mailman-Users] Search Archive Feature?

2001-10-25 Thread Mark T. Valites
Richard, I got a good one for you... Below in this email, you mentioned that you could get the patches to work if they ran on a different machine that the one that the actual archives lived on. Unfortuneatly, I think I may have to go there... Htdig does not compile under gcc-3.0.X, and it is

[Mailman-Users] mailman 2.0.6 problem

2001-10-25 Thread Kory Wheatley
I install Mailman 2.0.6 on a p600 10gb hard drive, 128mb, with RED HAT 7.2. The web interface works fine, I just can't receive email from the lists, when I subscribe a user they do receive a welcome message, but when they try to post a message to the list it's never received by any of the list

Re: [Mailman-Users] Old Question, New Twist

2001-10-25 Thread Greg Ward
On 25 October 2001, Timothy Brier said: > Question of concern to me is: > The RPM will verify that no dependencies will get broken. What method can I > use to verify that, as an example, if I install > Python 2, that no dependencies will be broken? That's where the fun comes in. Generally, you

Re: [Mailman-Users] Sendmail getting bum rap...

2001-10-25 Thread Amanda
My fundamental issue with sendmail is that it's not intuitive. The docs aren't intuitive or even helpful. One arrives at optimum system performance not by reading and making informed tweaks to the system, but by randomly twiddling and praying for the best. In other words, it's basically voodoo, an

Re: [Mailman-Users] Sendmail getting bum rap...

2001-10-25 Thread Timothy Brier
I know it came across as such, but I did not mean to bad mouth Sendmail. For all I know if I downloaded and compiled Sendmail I would get the same performance. I know a local ISP that uses and highly recommends it. My point was that although RPMs are a convenient way to install software, my exp

[Mailman-Users] Sendmail getting bum rap...

2001-10-25 Thread Jon Carnes
On Thursday 25 October 2001 10:48, Timothy Brier wrote: > I couldn't agree more. I was using the RPMs from RedHat with Sendmail. > It was taking about 30 minutes to deliver 500 messages. > > I downloaded and installed Postfix (not the RPM) and watched the time > drop to 1 minute and 45 seconds.

Re: [Mailman-Users] Old Question, New Twist

2001-10-25 Thread Amanda
RPMs under Drake, in my experience, are evile. I have gotten precisely one RPM for Mandrake 8 to install correctly on my system. Not using RPMs was the lesson I learned right after how to find downloaded files (imagine, webbing all these years, and the first thing I do in Mandrake is lose a downlo

Re: [Mailman-Users] despirate!!!!

2001-10-25 Thread Amanda
Hi Jenny, Jenny Mehlenbeck wrote: > I managed to get all the settings right. Auto responders, > subscribe/unscribe all works fine. Well, I'm not questioning your ability, but it sounds like at least one of the settings, somewhere, for something, isn't right. :-) Happens to all of us, from tim

Re: [Mailman-Users] Old Question, New Twist

2001-10-25 Thread Timothy Brier
I couldn't agree more. I was using the RPMs from RedHat with Sendmail. It was taking about 30 minutes to deliver 500 messages. I downloaded and installed Postfix (not the RPM) and watched the time drop to 1 minute and 45 seconds. I liked that experience enough to download the tar file for Mail

Re: [Mailman-Users] Old Question, New Twist

2001-10-25 Thread Jon Carnes
> > My problem is the age old: > Failure to exec script. WANTED gid 99, GOT gid 12. (Reconfigure to take > 12?) 554 5.3.0 unknown mailer error 2 > > I issued: find / -name configure - and came up with nothing ... I'm > assuming this is because I didn't compile the program, I simply used a > Mandr

Re: [Mailman-Users] problems getting Mailman set-up

2001-10-25 Thread Greg Ward
On 25 October 2001, Denis Croombs said: > I have RedHat 7.1 & Mailman 2.0.6 It installed OK and have followed the > manual from www.list.org/install-final.html but my APACHE will not accept > the line Read those instructions more carefully. It says *something like one of the following*, not "all

Re: [Mailman-Users] Old Question, New Twist

2001-10-25 Thread Greg Ward
On 25 October 2001, David Pierron said: > I am new to Linux, Sendmail, and Mailman (uh-oh) I hope you haven't killed too many brain cells struggling with Sendmail. Switch to a modern, comprehensible, high-performance, well-documented MTA like Exim or Postfix before it's too late! (If performance

Re: [Mailman-Users] missing footer for html mail?

2001-10-25 Thread Greg Ward
On 24 October 2001, Leo So said: > Hi I am using mailman 2.0.5 but noticed that footer > is not appended to each mail if the mail is in HTML. > Is it a known bug? I used to think this was a Mailman problem too. Read the HTML email as plain text (so you see all the tags), and I bet you'll see the

Re: [Mailman-Users] problems getting Mailman set-up

2001-10-25 Thread Michael Ghens
I don't think that is an Apache command. it should look more like this: ScriptAlias /mailman/ /home/mailman/cgi-bin/ Alias /pipermail/ /home/mailman/archives/public/ On Thu, 25 Oct 2001, Denis Croombs wrote: > Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2001 11:51:10 +0100 > From: Denis Croombs <[EMAIL PROTECT

[Mailman-Users] problems getting Mailman set-up

2001-10-25 Thread Denis Croombs
Hi I have RedHat 7.1 & Mailman 2.0.6 It installed OK and have followed the manual from www.list.org/install-final.html but my APACHE will not accept the line Exec /mailman/* /home/mailman/cgi-bin/* giving a systax error, bad command ! Any idea what I am doing wrong ? Denis Croombs --

[Mailman-Users] Old Question, New Twist

2001-10-25 Thread David Pierron
I am new to Linux, Sendmail, and Mailman (uh-oh) I have installed: Mandrake Linux 8.1 running Apache Web Server sendmail-8.12.1-4mdk & mailman-2.0.6-1mdk I used http://www.list.org/install-start.html and followed where I could to get the mailman package configured ... I looked through the mailm