I was connected to the Admin web interface from home and the
connection was dropped by the server.
Now, I am online again but cannot access the Mailman Admin
interface.
Why is this so and how can I fix it ?
Thanx you.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
--
OK I got the list-request wrapper to work by creating a Alias to it in
sendmail
("logical" not exact wordings)
list-request = Sendtoprogram /etc/smrsh/mailman_wrapper mailcmd listname
and now do the same thing but change mailcmd to post? for the "listname"
wrapper.
Now is there a way built i
I rolled my system our for the first time this morning and I am having
problems. The system jams up. I can't access the "administer" area; my
mailing list people can't access their "options" page and people can't
subscribe. It appears that his happens a few minutes after I forward a
message and th
Hi all,
First time caller longtime listener,
Well... Not really but ok...
I am having some wrapper problems as it seems send mail dose not like the
way I have it setup
I suspect that I have a argument missing.
Quote from email:-- The following addresses had permanent fatal
errors -
Hi
all,
First time caller
longtime listener,
Well... Not
really but ok...
I am having some
wrapper problems as it seems send mail dose not like the way I have it setup
I suspect that I
have a argument missing.
Quote from
email: -- The following addresses had
permanent fa
Dear all,
I set up MAILMAN to handle administrativia commands but this
doesnt work. Today, I found out people can send a message with a
single uns**cribe command and it is distributed. The forum
reaches over 2500 scientists and this is truly annoying.
How can I get MAILMAN to
On Mon, 18 Jun 2001 13:47:27 -0700
Elaine Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I started a small list, and in its first day (when thankfully we
> had only about ten members) a woman whom I know to be net-savvy
> and who posts without trouble to other (non-Mailman) lists I'm on,
> posted an email
On Monday 18 June 2001 01:54 pm, Wang, Mary Y wrote:
> I am using the Mailman as the mailing list. I have a question, as an
> admin, if the list member sends me a message that he/she wants to post. How
> do I post his/her message? I could not find this option from the
> administrative functions
> NAME-OF-THE-LIST@
>
> is not the same as
>
> name-of-the-list@
>
> People will use both-
Not if one doesn't work, they won't.
--
Mailman-Users maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailm
Hullo!
I've used majordomo in a small way before, and am new to Mailman.
I have an awful problem.
I started a small list, and in its first day (when thankfully we had only
about ten members) a woman whom I know to be net-savvy and who
posts without trouble to other (non-Mailman) lists I'm on
Hi,
I am using the Mailman as the mailing list. I have a question, as an admin,
if the list member sends me a message that he/she wants to post. How do I
post his/her message? I could not find this option from the administrative
functions.
Thanks in advance.
Mary
Mary
(562) 797-1545
On Mon, 18 Jun 2001 12:51:18 -0400
bob > wrote:
>> Yes, real mail admins know to mkfs /var/spool with a higher inode
>> count than the rest of their systems. I'll let you guess what
>> percentage of mail admins actually do.
>>
>> There are quite a few lists out there running off i486 boxes wi
On Mon, Jun 18, 2001 at 02:04:26PM -0400, Bob Puff@NLE wrote:
> > Which operating system?
>
> Linux (Mandrake 7.x) on a i586.
>
> I have no "newfs". I do have a mke2fs. What is a suggested value for "bytes per
>inode" to handle the mail stuff we have been discussing? What is the default sett
Is mail on this list looping for everyone, or just me?
I have gotten countless copies of this message.
--neil
On 15 Jun 2001 11:03:39 -0700, Chuq Von Rospach wrote:
>
> On Friday, June 15, 2001, at 09:19 AM, Mark Roedel wrote:
>
> > Interesting idea, but I wonder how well it'd work in actual
> Which operating system?
Linux (Mandrake 7.x) on a i586.
I have no "newfs". I do have a mke2fs. What is a suggested value for "bytes per
inode" to handle the mail stuff we have been discussing? What is the default setting?
Bob
--
Mailman
On Mon, Jun 18, 2001 at 12:51:18PM -0400, Bob Puff@NLE wrote:
> > Yes, real mail admins know to mkfs /var/spool with a higher inode
> > count than the rest of their systems. I'll let you guess what
> > percentage of mail admins actually do.
> >
> > There are quite a few lists out there run
OK Folks I have a little problem with 2.0. This all of the
sudden began to happen and I don't really know where to look
for the cause. Thsi seems to be happening on only one list
out of 4 that are running on one server. Normally the mail
is delivered within 3 to 5 minutes, but the customer
complai
On Mon, 18 Jun 2001, Bob Puff@NLE wrote:
> > Yes, real mail admins know to mkfs /var/spool with a higher inode
> > count than the rest of their systems. I'll let you guess what
> > percentage of mail admins actually do.
> >
> > There are quite a few lists out there running off i486 boxes wi
> Yes, real mail admins know to mkfs /var/spool with a higher inode
> count than the rest of their systems. I'll let you guess what
> percentage of mail admins actually do.
>
> There are quite a few lists out there running off i486 boxes with
> small disks. Some of them have nice bandwidt
On 17 Jun 2001 09:22:40 -0700, J C Lawrence wrote:
> I suspect Nigel Metherington is going to chime in here,
Definitely - you mispelt my name - I *hate* that :-)
Seriously, I've just come back to this fresh and its a big chunk to
take in at one reading. What I will do is take a weeks logs from
> -Original Message-
> From: Chuq Von Rospach [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>
> > Computers are cheap. Bandwidth isn't necessarily cheap. I
> run with a
> > very high chunking factor because my MTA properly handles it
>
> But -- if this went away, what would it do to your bandwidth? Ar
21 matches
Mail list logo
