On Fri, 1 Jun 2001, Nick Seidenman wrote:
>
> For the past week or so mailman seems to be sending every post sent to
> to the -request address, too. Has anyone else seen
> this behaviour? I'm open to suggestions as to what would cause it and how
> to correct it. There have been no changes to
On 1 Jun 2001, Arif Mamdani wrote:
> Stripping attachments would be the ideal, but it's not realistic for
> what my lists are being used for. So, aside from stripping
> attachements, what else is out there that will help me cut down on the
> number of virus being spread far and wide by users on
> "MTG" == Mike T Gholson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
MTG> Barry, when do you suspect that a build will be released
MTG> with this feature?
I never make estimates, but I'm starting to feel like there's enough
new features for a new alpha pretty soon.
-Barry
---
> "Satya" == Satya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Satya> On Jun 1, 2001 at 13:38, Michael Powe wrote:
>> I add all get the notification of subscription. But, when one
>> of the users posts to the list, I'm the only one who gets a
>> copy of the mail.
>> I think this may b
On Jun 1, 2001 at 13:38, Michael Powe wrote:
>I add all get the notification of subscription. But, when one of the
>users posts to the list, I'm the only one who gets a copy of the
>mail.
>
>I think this may be because of the way my incoming mail is handled. I
>have a DSL connection w/domain
I just wanted to post a note thanking the powers that be for making this list
members-only posting. The reduction in spam has been very much appreciated!
Bob
--
Mailman-Users maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listi
I updated my raq3 with the os and security patches available from cobalt (v.4.0)
and I've noticed in my virtusertable a new section has been added:
# catch-all aliases
It appears email messages sent to non-existing users in any of the virtual hosts
on my system are sent messages back to
Hello all!
What would be the best way to add searching capabilities to the mailman list
archives?
Any opinions, thoughts, suggestions will be appreciated.
TIA
Rodrigo
--
Mailman-Users maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.python.org/ma
Good day,
First time poster so go easy on me.
I want to archive another list that I'm a member of (not the admin
and the other list isn't mailman). So I figured I'd setup a list on my box
and subscribe that list to the other list. So far so good.
My list works, I get mes
On Fri, Jun 01, 2001 at 11:16:02AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I am having with the mailing lists is although I have
> put in several addresses that mail should not be held up for authorization
> from on a newsletter type mailing list, the messages keep being held and the
> reason it is gi
@ Fil ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) :
>
> How is it possible that mimelib seems to be installed inside python but not
> mailman? Here's what I get (from the very latest CVS, but it's been like
> that for a while, I'm just tired of stumbling on this same issue each time I
> try to upgrade).
Sorry folks, I
On 01 Jun 2001 10:37:23 -0400
Arif Mamdani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Stripping attachments would be the ideal, but it's not realistic
> for what my lists are being used for.
> So, aside from stripping attachements, what else is out there that
> will help me cut down on the number of viru
After a fruitless search of docs and archives, I've resorted to the
list...
Installed Mailman on a pc running Mandrake 8 and qmail. Created my
test list. It said "Hit enter to continue with notification of list
owner," and I said yes. No mail ever arrived. From looking at the
qmail log, no mail w
How is it possible that mimelib seems to be installed inside python but not
mailman? Here's what I get (from the very latest CVS, but it's been like
that for a while, I'm just tired of stumbling on this same issue each time I
try to upgrade).
Not sure where to look at. Reinstalled mimelib sever
Dear Barry,
I've put together a quick'n'dirty translation at
http://listes.rezo.net/how.php
If someone wants to correct my English, s/he's welcome.
> snip snip
> AN ALTERNATIVE APPROACH
>
> Fil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> has an alternative approach base
Second request.
OS = RH Linux 7.1
Python = 2.1
mailman = 2.0.5
clicking on the link (Tend to pending administrative requests) under the
administration web interface will return the following
error message into the mailman error log file:
admin(18366): [- Traceback --]
admin(1
Hello,
I set up MailMan according to the instructions and it 'seems' to be
working. But, it's not working correctly. I have set it up on a
Slackware linux 7.1 machine, Apache & sendmail. When I log into the
web interface and add some users, that seems to work. The users that
I add all get the
How would this be useful?
> -Original Message-
> From: Alonso Téllez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>
> How can i tell to mailman that the field "To:" must be the
> mail address of each list member?
--
Mailman-Users maillist - [EMAIL P
Barry, when do you suspect that a build will be released
with this feature?
> -Original Message-
> From: Barry A. Warsaw [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>
> The new religion for MM2.1 will involve adding an alias_maps entry
> pointing to $prefix/data/aliases which Mailman will manage
> automa
> "F" == Fil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| I've put together a quick'n'dirty translation at
| http://listes.rezo.net/how.php
Looks good to me, I'll add both links.
--
Mailman-Users maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.pytho
On Friday, June 1, 2001, at 11:35 AM, Vaughn Wilkes wrote:
> Is there an easier way of deleting large amount of subscribers at once,
> rather than deleting them one at a time? Thanks.
check out bin/remove_users
if you have a file with a list of addresses to unsubscribe, you can:
remove_users
I am having with the mailing lists is although I have
put in several addresses that mail should not be held up for authorization
from on a newsletter type mailing list, the messages keep being held and the
reason it is giving for not allowing the message to go through is this:
"Cause: Message ha
> "F" == Fil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
F> You can also use our tricks explained in
F> http://listes.rezo.net/comment.php (we use regular expressions
F> in aliases)
Right, darn I don't mean to diss you on that Fil! How about the
following text added to README.POSTFIX?
-Barry
> PS> Really? Interesting. I've just switched from sendmail to
> PS> postfix, and I haven't learned any trick yet by which this can
> PS> be accomplished. What's the secret?
>
> There was an old way using luser_relay, recipient_delimiter, and a
> Mailman script called `auto'. I su
Is there an easier way of deleting large amount of subscribers at once,
rather than deleting them one at a time? Thanks.
Vaughn Wilkes
IT Engineer
ProClarity Corporation
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<>
Vaughn Wilkes.vcf
Hi,
Mailman is a very good GPL software, better that majordomo.
Well, I have running a Mailman 2.0.5 in very good conditions, and there
are just a problem.
When a list member "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" post a message to my list
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]", this message arrive to all users as:
From: [EMAIL PRO
> "PS" == Phil Stracchino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
PS> On Thu, May 31, 2001 at 09:11:06PM -0700, J C Lawrence wrote:
>> Depending on your MTA and its configuration, yes, this is true.
>> Some MTAs, such as Exim and Postfix, can be configured to not
>> need a list alias fil
For the past week or so mailman seems to be sending every post sent to
to the -request address, too. Has anyone else seen
this behaviour? I'm open to suggestions as to what would cause it and how
to correct it. There have been no changes to the list config that I'm
aware of or that I can see.
Hi,
I installed mailman on my system without problem and thanks all people that
work on this project for their great work. After installation and set-up of
required parameters, I'm able to use the majority of all options into the
program with the exception of the "Tend to pending administrative r
On Thu, May 31, 2001 at 11:14:11PM -0700, J C Lawrence wrote:
>
> ObDisclosure: I currently use Postfix on all my list servers. I
> used to use Exim. I still run Exim on other systems (such as the
> one I'm typing on now). I've used both for many months (years in
> Exim's case). I made the ch
> I'm wondering if you could reccomend a good anti-virus filter/scanner
> thing that I can use to scan the mail going through my lists, ideally
> one that would alert me and/or the list admin before sending out mail
> that was potentially infected.
Stripping all attachments is certainly a good st
Stripping attachments would be the ideal, but it's not realistic for
what my lists are being used for. So, aside from stripping
attachements, what else is out there that will help me cut down on the
number of virus being spread far and wide by users on my lists?
-arif
On 01 Jun 2001 16:16:30
[Subject fixed]
On 01 Jun 2001 09:26:21 -0400, Clayton, Robert wrote:
> I have been seeing that my mail threads are not consistently working.
> Can someone tell me what mailMan uses to qualify a mail thread?
> Some mail works some are treated as new mail even though they should be threaded.
Tha
> -Original Message-
> From: Arif Mamdani [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, June 01, 2001 16:16
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [Mailman-Users] Know of a good anti-virus filter?
>
> Hey folks,
> I'm wondering if you could reccomend a good anti-virus filter/scanner
> thing th
Hey folks,
I'm wondering if you could reccomend a good anti-virus filter/scanner
thing that I can use to scan the mail going through my lists, ideally
one that would alert me and/or the list admin before sending out mail
that was potentially infected.
thanks,
-arif
--
Arif Mamdani, Circuit Rid
> It doesn't look like sendmail is the greatest MTA for
> use with Mailman. What is a good MTA that seems to work
> well with Mailman?
Since it hasn't been mentioned yet... I have found qmail to be a
very good MTA and Mailman works well with it. You get the added
advantage that you can run some
I have been seeing that my mail threads are not consistently working.
Can someone tell me what mailMan uses to qualify a mail thread?
Some mail works some are treated as new mail even though they should be threaded.
thanks,
Bob
--
Mailman-User
On Thu, 31 May 2001, Mike T. Gholson wrote:
> It doesn't look like sendmail is the greatest MTA for
> use with Mailman. What is a good MTA that seems to work
> well with Mailman?
I've had good luck with Sendmail (when my lists were smaller),
Postfix, and now I'm using the Windows 2000 SMTP Servi
On Thu, May 31, 2001 at 09:11:06PM -0700, J C Lawrence wrote:
> Depending on your MTA and its configuration, yes, this is true.
> Some MTAs, such as Exim and Postfix, can be configured to not need a
> list alias file at all.
Really? Interesting. I've just switched from sendmail to postfix, and
39 matches
Mail list logo
