Did you try to install Mailman 2.0.3 from scratch ? I'm a new user of
mailman, and everything is OK for me with it, no problems at the moment.
With a few scripts, you'll be able to keep you lists&archives from your
"old" installation.
I usually do not like "upgrade" options. Is the mailman on
> "jk" == josh koenig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
jk> That's what's so baffling.
Indeed!
jk> The apache error log gives me the useless "premature end of
jk> script headers" and nothing comes up in the mailman or
jk> syslogs. I'll keep looking, though
Okay, thanks.
> jk> First of all, whenever I try to use /admin/listname I get a
> jk> generic 500 script error. The web log reports "premature end
> jk> of script headers" I know this isn't a permissions problem as
> jk> check_perms gives me an all clear.
>
> Are you using Apache? Do you see n
> "jk" == josh koenig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
jk> First of all, whenever I try to use /admin/listname I get a
jk> generic 500 script error. The web log reports "premature end
jk> of script headers" I know this isn't a permissions problem as
jk> check_perms gives me an all
> "JRM" == Jason R Mastaler writes:
JRM> I tried upgrading to Python-2.1 this morning, and qrunner
JRM> didn't seem to like this:
I swear, the synchronicity is really amazing! I've just upgraded my
home machine to Python 2.1 by default, and of course am seeing exactly
the same warn
Helo,
I have install Mailman Mailing List in my web site. But why, if member post
their message, it always wait for admin's approval? The reason is "Message
has implicit destination". What does this message means? My mailing list
name is [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks for your help,
ap.
www.armanto
Helo,
I have install Mailman Mailing List in my web site.
But why, if member post their message, it always wait for admin's approval? The
reason is "Message has implicit destination". What does this message means? My
mailing list name is mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks for your help,
ap.
>Is there any way to configure Mailman to authenticate posters against
>headers other than From:?
>
>I have a subscriber who frequently changes From: addresses, but has a
>consistent Reply-To: address, and Mailman is properly rejecting his posts
>because they originate from varying addressen
On Tue, 17 Apr 2001, JC Dill wrote:
> What I do (on a majordomo list) is have the person subscribe all the other
> "from" addresses to a companion list that is allowed to post to the main
> list. With Mailman, I believe you can accomplish the same thing in an
> easier fashion by having him subscr
On 07:58 PM 4/17/01, Ashton Treadway wrote:
>
>Hi:
>
>Is there any way to configure Mailman to authenticate posters against
>headers other than From:?
>
>I have a subscriber who frequently changes From: addresses, but has a
>consistent Reply-To: address, and Mailman is properly rejecting h
Hi:
Is there any way to configure Mailman to authenticate posters against
headers other than From:?
I have a subscriber who frequently changes From: addresses, but has a
consistent Reply-To: address, and Mailman is properly rejecting his posts
because they originate from varying addressen.
Tha
On Tuesday, April 17, 2001, at 06:02 PM, Dan Mick wrote:
> I created a withlist script and a mail template to send reminders
> to all "nomail" folks, and run it by hand from time to time;
> I'm not convinced it's better, but it lets me not permanently
> lose people without giving them a chance t
> I guess it depends on what list server background you have. If you're
> familiar with listserv and it's relatives that have nomail, this makes
> sense. If you're coming from majordomo or have no real mlist experience, I
> think it's confusing. And I'm not sure if it really buys you much (and
>
I run your list from sourceforge, have run it from other sites as well.
Currently I want to post a small field for an email address and a Go button
for ease of joining. Is there a way to do this that allows mailman to
generate the password?
Thanks
lh
> "F" == Fil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
F> what happened to HandlerAPI.py ?
After the redesign of the qrunner stuff, it was no longer necessary.
F> It is not there any more in the CVS tree, but it is still
F> called by cron/checkdbs and cron/mailpasswds
F> can someone ex
Hi,
what happened to HandlerAPI.py ?
It is not there any more in the CVS tree, but it is still called by
cron/checkdbs and cron/mailpasswds
can someone explain?
-- Fil
--
Mailman-Users maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.python.org/
On 07:59 AM 4/17/01, Satya wrote:
>[posted and mailed]
>
>On Apr 17, 2001 at 16:10, Rob Gould wrote:
>
>>Hi...When a mail subscriber sends a request to my server such as
>>"help", the reply he/she gets begins with the message saying that
>>"there were problems with the email commands you se
On Tue, Apr 17, 2001 at 12:11:06PM +0200, Futureweb.at - Patrick Bey-Neuner wrote:
> hi,
>
> is there any way to let people subscribe to mailman
> but don't have to double confirm it?
Yes (allow open subscribes in mm_cfg.py) but you sure do not want to allow
this unless it's internal to your com
> Anyway, I own a private list and my provider just switched to Mailman (yay)
> but my users hate all those List-* headers. Is there a way to remove or
> suppress them?
See http://www.nleaudio.com/bnotes/mailman.htm
Bob
--
Mailman-Users mai
I was about to compose an email about the very same thing. I've
been fighting with the Admin part of the interface for a few weeks now. I
can get in to see the emails that are pending approval, but at the bottom
of that same page, there is usually the "We're sorry, we've hit a bug!".
Aft
Hi, I've been using Mailman with some success for a while, but I've just
started having some serious problems with admin functions after upgrading
to version 2.0.3
First of all, whenever I try to use /admin/listname I get a generic 500
script error. The web log reports "premature end of script h
Does any one know the process for purging the admin approval spool for a
particular list?
One of my lists recently was spammed and I have several hundred request
waiting for approval. Is there a way to delete them all without using the
web interface?
Thanks!
> "KW" == Kory Wheatley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
KW> I'm receiving this error below which is sent to the Owner of
KW> Mailman's email account every minute when the Qrunner cron
KW> process runs. Does anyone know what this means. Please respond
KW> to [EMAIL PROTECTED], ( I
I'm receiving this error below which is sent to the Owner of Mailman's
email account every minute when the Qrunner cron process runs. Does
anyone know what this means. Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED], ( I
have over 150 mailman mailing lists that its critical that they function
properly). I wo
I tried upgrading to Python-2.1 this morning, and qrunner didn't seem
to like this:
From: root (Cron Daemon)
Subject: Cron /usr/local/bin/python -S /usr/local/mailman/cron/qrunner
To: mailman
Date: 17 Apr 2001 15:49:00 -
/usr/local/mailman/cron/qrunner:0: SyntaxWarning: name '_listcache' is
[posted and mailed]
On Apr 17, 2001 at 16:10, Rob Gould wrote:
>Hi...When a mail subscriber sends a request to my server such as
>"help", the reply he/she gets begins with the message saying that
>"there were problems with the email commands you sent to Mailman via
>the administrative address...
On Apr 17, 2001 at 16:49, Geert Altena wrote:
>I agree that the MUAs are at fault here also, however, what if those header
>were changed to X- headers? Most b0rken MUA would ignore them
>then and smart MUA could still make use of them...
I believe the standard called for non-X headers. X-headers
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> I agree that the MUAs are at fault here also, however, what if those
> header were changed to X- headers? Most b0rken MUA would
> ignore them then and smart MUA could still make use of them...
Can't do that - if you did then they wouldn't match the RFC describing
them
Quoting Dave Sherohman, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Tue, Apr 17, 2001 at 08:40:24AM -0500, Chris Burch wrote:
[snip]
> > Anyway, I own a private list and my provider just switched to Mailman (yay)
> > but my users hate all those List-* headers. Is there a way to remove or
> > suppress them?
>
>
A workaround ...
On mailman, if archives are actived, you can get the mailbox (unix format)
at the following URL :
http://server.domain.dom/pipermail/.mbox/.mbox (if
public) or $prefix/archives/private/.mbox
Then copy/paste its contents to the unix mailbox of the user(s)
(/var/mail/ I mean
Hi...When a mail subscriber sends a request to my server such as "help", the
reply he/she gets begins with the message saying that "there were problems
with the email commands you sent to Mailman via the administrative
address...". It then continues with the requested info. I see that this
only
There is a 'list_members' program in the /home/mailman/bin dir.
try "/home/mailman/bin/list_members | grep xxx.yyy.zz"
I believe you can also send a message to the listname-request address
with 'who' in the subject. To get the users.
-neil
On 17 Apr 2001 16:12:44 +0200, Alexander van den Ei
On Tue, Apr 17, 2001 at 08:40:24AM -0500, Chris Burch wrote:
> Sorry if this has been asked a million times; I browsed through 2001-04
> archive and didn't see anything (not a very thorough search, I admit)...
It has. I'd say the 4 most frequently asked questions here are (in no
particular orde
Good Morning,
I've already ran into problems with converting from Majordomo to
Mailman. Besides the 2 issues I asked about yesterday, I have users
who want to be able to get the archives via email. My looking didn't
uncover this. Is it possible?
Ciao,
--
Pug Bainter
Is there a way to get (as owner) the complete list of addresses on the
list.
Need to find some addresses, with the same @xxx.yyy.zz part and don't
want to get it with thirty apiece.
Please help
---
--
Alexander van den Ei
Hi...When a mail subscriber sends a request to my server such as "help",
the reply he/she gets begins with the message saying that "there were problems
with the email commands you sent to Mailman via the administrative
address...". It then continues with the requested info. I see that
this
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> Anyway, I own a private list and my provider just switched to Mailman
> (yay) but my users hate all those List-* headers. Is there a way to
> remove or suppress them? Or am I repeating the Wish List item I think
> I saw but repressed...
Short answer: no
Long answer
The footer is there, you just cant see it.
The footer is put after the closing html tag:
text of your email
your footer
Your footer is ignored by the mail client because it is not within the
html tags.
--Neil
On 17 Apr 2001 15:07:43 +0200, Rob Gould wrote:
> Hi all...I am doing some testi
Hello,
Sorry if this has been asked a million times; I browsed through 2001-04
archive and didn't see anything (not a very thorough search, I admit)...
Anyway, I own a private list and my provider just switched to Mailman (yay)
but my users hate all those List-* headers. Is there a way to remo
On Mon, Apr 16, 2001 at 11:27:28PM -0400, Jesse Kornblum wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Apr 2001, KevinL wrote:
>
> > I've had a request from someone I'm hosting a privacy-related list
> > for, to disable the '/options//' functionality, or
> > to at least make it such that people can't "probe" for addresses
Is there any way to change the generic technical info included in the
welcome msg? I am only running a announcement list so do not need the
option to post messages.
Please reply to my e-mail below.
Thanks.
Rob
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Mailman-U
Hi all...I am doing some testing of my Mailman setup and have noticed that
the footer information only appears if the message is sent out in Plain Text
format (using OE5). Does Mailman only handle text mails and not HTML
formatted mail? Or is there a way to get the footer info onto a HTML mail?
Good Morning,
My company just went through a merger and we are losing all of our
computers and purchasing new ones. I have an older version mailman
that I am using currently and have
just loaded the newest version of mailman on one of the five computers we
are not losing.
My question is, Woul
Andrew Brown wrote:
>
> Does anyone have experience of running multi-lingual lists? I'd like
> list members to be able to choose the language of their web interface
> and for this choice to stick with them.
This is one of the new feature of next release of Mailman.
Wait for it.
If you are so un
hi,
is there any way to let people subscribe to mailman
but don't have to double confirm it?
thanks
patrick
**
Futureweb St. Johann
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"I am easily satisfied by the very best"
- Winston Churchill
--
Mailman-Users
45 matches
Mail list logo
