[Mailman-Users] error report

2001-04-04 Thread Chaw Tjia
I've set the mailman succeed, and create newlist tjia, and i subscribed through web-based program, and replied by the mailman subscribe number. when I try to repl the confirmation number, I got a message : -- Forwarded message -- Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2001 11:46:27 +0700 From: Mail De

[Mailman-Users] Returned mail: see transcript for details (fwd)

2001-04-04 Thread Chaw Tjia
I'd Like to ask what is it all about ? I've made new mailing-list tjia, and have subscribed to the mailing list, but when I want to repl the confirmation, there were error as follows : please help me out of this -- Forwarded message -- Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2001 11:39:52 +0700 From: M

[Mailman-Users] cgi problems with one list on functining server

2001-04-04 Thread Moacir
-- Mailman-Users maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users

[Mailman-Users] weird mailman bug

2001-04-04 Thread Jon Spewak
This is weird. Just created a new mailing list called "Junk", and successfully administrated the options throughout the mailing list. I had a friend of mine subscribe to the list via the webpage, got email verification, and he responded to it. I tried to get back in to the Junk Administration p

[Mailman-Users] Sender header vs. SMTP envelope FROM

2001-04-04 Thread Rupa Schomaker
mailman used the SMTP envelope to determine who the message was from. It now uses the Sender: header. Is there a bit to flip that would cause it to work the old way? -- Mailman-Users maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.python.org/mailman

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman

2001-04-04 Thread J C Lawrence
On Wed, 4 Apr 2001 13:12:40 -0700 (PDT) alex wetmore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm not really sure why Marc makes such sweeping statements as the > one above. Simple really -- I don't believe that any of the current developer base has any personal interest or motivation for a Windows port. I

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman

2001-04-04 Thread Marc MERLIN
On Wed, Apr 04, 2001 at 03:12:58PM -0400, Neil Cooler wrote: > Is this better for performance? It can be, but it depends (fork times, how many receipients are included in each mail, etc, etc...) > Can I tell mailman to use another server to send the mail? SMTPHOST in ~mailman/Mailman/{Default

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman

2001-04-04 Thread alex wetmore
On 4 Apr 2001, Neil Cooler wrote: > Marc MERLIN <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > It's windows 2000 that isn't compatible with mailman :-) > > (the best part, is that mailman being 95%+ python, it could run on windows > > with few modifications, but I don't think any of the people able to do this >

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman

2001-04-04 Thread J C Lawrence
On 04 Apr 2001 14:53:43 -0400 Neil Cooler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> It's windows 2000 that isn't compatible with mailman :-) (the >> best part, is that mailman being 95%+ python, it could run on >> windows with few modifications, but I don't think any of the >> people able to do this would s

[Mailman-Users] Something to add to the wishlist

2001-04-04 Thread Alex Hathaway
How about easy setup for qmail users? The text README.QMAIL bites. It uses vague terminology and doesn't give much help :P -- Mailman-Users maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman

2001-04-04 Thread Neil Cooler
Is this better for performance? Can I tell mailman to use another server to send the mail? --Neil On 04 Apr 2001 11:59:10 -0700, Marc MERLIN wrote: > On Wed, Apr 04, 2001 at 02:53:43PM -0400, Neil Cooler wrote: > > > > > > > > It's windows 2000 that isn't compatible with mailman :-) > > > (th

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman

2001-04-04 Thread Marc MERLIN
On Wed, Apr 04, 2001 at 02:53:43PM -0400, Neil Cooler wrote: > > > > > It's windows 2000 that isn't compatible with mailman :-) > > (the best part, is that mailman being 95%+ python, it could run on windows > > with few modifications, but I don't think any of the people able to do this > > wo

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman

2001-04-04 Thread Neil Cooler
> > It's windows 2000 that isn't compatible with mailman :-) > (the best part, is that mailman being 95%+ python, it could run on windows > with few modifications, but I don't think any of the people able to do this > would see the point and bother to try and port it) How is this possible?

[Mailman-Users] Re: delivery failure

2001-04-04 Thread Robert Brandtjen
on 4/4/01 1:30 PM, Bernhard R. Erdmann at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Your email Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman, Wed, 04 Apr 2001 13:28:43 -0500 > containing HTML junk is not wanted here for security reasons. It has been > bounced without human intervention. > Umm, it was a reply, erdmann, so f***-

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman

2001-04-04 Thread Robert Brandtjen
Title: Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman on 4/4/01 1:17 PM, Sohail Bhamani at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is '  Mailman   ' Compatible with Windows 2000 ??? Is anything really compatible with windows ? Seriously, no, it’s Unix.  Robert Brandtjen  --  Web Site Creat

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman

2001-04-04 Thread Marc MERLIN
On Wed, Apr 04, 2001 at 12:17:19PM -0600, Sohail Bhamani wrote: > > > Hello, > Quick question please, > > Is ' Mailman ' Compatible with Windows 2000 ??? It's windows 2000 that isn't compatible with mailman :-) (the best part, is that mailman being 95%+ python, it could run on windows wit

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman

2001-04-04 Thread Neil Cooler
No, you need a UNIX machine to run Mailman. --Neil On 04 Apr 2001 12:17:19 -0600, Sohail Bhamani wrote: > > > Hello, > Quick question please, > > Is ' Mailman ' Compatible with Windows 2000 ??? > > Thanks. > > > > Sohail Bhamani > Windows 2000 Professional, Project Team. > IT De

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman redundancy

2001-04-04 Thread Steve Pirk
This helps a lot... Thank you! It all makes sense now. Steve [EMAIL PROTECTED] Owner/Admin deathcon.com - pirk.com webops.com - disclaimer.com -- On Wed, 4 Apr 2001, Christopher P. Lindsey wrote: > > Yes. The sendmail.cw file specifies which hosts should be treated > the same as localhost,

[Mailman-Users] Mailman

2001-04-04 Thread Sohail Bhamani
Title: Mailman Hello, Quick question please, Is '  Mailman   ' Compatible with Windows 2000 ??? Thanks. Sohail Bhamani Windows 2000 Professional, Project Team. IT Department. NOVA Chemicals Inc. Calgary, AB, CANADA ((403) 750-3827 -[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman redundancy

2001-04-04 Thread Phydeaux
At 10:06 AM 4/4/2001 -0700, Steve Pirk wrote: >A simpler solution would be to use backup mail servers. It would >be fairly hard (IMHO) to keep multiple mailman installs in sync. >I would use the main DSL server to actually run the list, but add >in 2 other MX servers to "hold" your mail until your

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman redundancy

2001-04-04 Thread Jerry Adlersfluegel
On Wed, 4 Apr 2001, Steve Pirk wrote: > Ok, so you then add the "domain" that is used for the mailing > list to the sendmail.cw file or it's equivalent (domains I > accept mail for). > > Would the secondary/third servers then then try to deliver > it locally? That is where I get confused :-)

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman redundancy

2001-04-04 Thread Christopher P. Lindsey
> Ok, so you then add the "domain" that is used for the mailing > list to the sendmail.cw file or it's equivalent (domains I > accept mail for). > > Would the secondary/third servers then then try to deliver > it locally? That is where I get confused :-) Yes. The sendmail.cw file specifies

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman redundancy

2001-04-04 Thread Steve Pirk
Ok, so you then add the "domain" that is used for the mailing list to the sendmail.cw file or it's equivalent (domains I accept mail for). Would the secondary/third servers then then try to deliver it locally? That is where I get confused :-) Steve [EMAIL PROTECTED] Owner/Admin deathcon.com

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman redundancy

2001-04-04 Thread Steve Pirk
A simpler solution would be to use backup mail servers. It would be fairly hard (IMHO) to keep multiple mailman installs in sync. I would use the main DSL server to actually run the list, but add in 2 other MX servers to "hold" your mail until your line comes back... zone file: INMX 5

Re: [Mailman-Users] Help me

2001-04-04 Thread Chris Boot
Hi, > 1.>I have installed mailman on my server, I've created a list, changed > aliases, run newaliases and typed > http://mailman.com.mymcomm.com/cgi-bin/listinfo.cgi > on the browser, which is showing no publicly advertised list available.But > when I clicked "the list admin overview page " link

Re: [Mailman-Users] Bad sender info for monthly reminder

2001-04-04 Thread Norman P. B. Joseph
I've seen the same thing (2.0.1). I'd be interested to know if there's a remedy available or in the works. At best it's a nusance. At worst, as you say, it can confuse people. -- Norman Joseph, UNIX Systems Engineer [EMAIL PROTECTED]IC|XC Concurrent Technologies Corporation

[Mailman-Users] Bad sender info for monthly reminder

2001-04-04 Thread Rupa Schomaker
I got the following "password" reminder this month: Headers: Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-Sieve: cmu-sieve 1.3 Received: from gw.rupa.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gw.rupa.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E345CE6B1 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 1 Apr 200

[Mailman-Users] help me

2001-04-04 Thread Manojit
HI, 1.>I have installed mailman on my server, I've created a list, changed aliases, run newaliases and typed http://mailman.com.mymcomm.com/cgi-bin/listinfo.cgi on the browser, which is showing no publicly advertised list available.But when I clicked "the list admin overview page " link it shows m

Re: [Mailman-Users] new version of command line tools

2001-04-04 Thread Cristian Prevedello
On Wed, Apr 04, 2001 at 08:32:32AM -0400, Kevin McCann wrote: > At 01:53 PM 2001/04/04 +0200, you wrote: > >Greetings, > >i've released a new version of mailman-cmd tools. > >I've fixed some bugs, and added two features (values assumed by config > >variables are printed in human readble form, ther

[Mailman-Users] Help me

2001-04-04 Thread Manojit
  HI,1.>I have installed mailman on my server, I've created a list, changed aliases, run newaliases and typed http://mailman.com.mymcomm.com/cgi-bin/listinfo.cgion the browser, which is showing no publicly advertised list available.But when I clicked "the list admin overview

[Mailman-Users] Mailman redundancy

2001-04-04 Thread Jarvis, John
I have a small list on a dsl connection and the evil company Verizon can't seem to maintain very well. What I would like to do is implement list redundancy across two machines that have different ISPs. Out of curiosity as anyone successfully done this? Could be fun to set up, I am thinking a co

[Mailman-Users] new version of command line tools

2001-04-04 Thread Cristian Prevedello
Greetings, i've released a new version of mailman-cmd tools. I've fixed some bugs, and added two features (values assumed by config variables are printed in human readble form, there is a command to know which values can be assued by variables). This package can be downloaded from ftp://chiara.

Re: [Mailman-Users] Exporting my current members to text list

2001-04-04 Thread Philippe Rodriguez
Or sent an email to -request@ with subject 'who' (without quotes) and empty message. Try to send a message with subject 'help' : you'll have all the directive you can use by sending an email to -request. Phil :)) On Tue, 3 Apr 2001, J C Lawrence wrote: > On Tue, 3 Apr 2001 21:30:03 -0500 >