I wanted to install the new packages in a virtualenv
On Mon, 29 Feb 2016, 05:15 Abhilash Raj, wrote:
> Hi Sourav,
>
> On 02/28/2016 01:42 PM, Saurav Kumar wrote:
> > I want to install Mailman in a custom directory, rather than using
> > "user
> > site-package" directory which is default w
On 02/29/2016 12:02 AM, Saurav Kumar wrote:
> I wanted to install the new packages in a virtualenv
Then, just running 'python setup.py install' from the source or 'pip
install ' when the the virtualenv is activated should
install the package inside the virtualenv. Notice that you *don't*[1]
have t
Hi Abhilash Raj, Hi Steve
Thank you both for taking the time and considering to mentor me.
On 28.02.2016 04:48, Abhilash Raj wrote:
> If you don't know, I worked on this project some time back in GSoC 2013.
> The current state of that project is not very good and probably needs a
> *lot* of reba
On 02/29/2016 03:02 AM, Jonas wrote:
> Hi Abhilash Raj, Hi Steve
>
> Thank you both for taking the time and considering to mentor me.
>
> On 28.02.2016 04:48, Abhilash Raj wrote:
>> If you don't know, I worked on this project some time back in GSoC 2013.
>> The current state of that project is n
I know I was talking to someone a while ago about maybe doing some fuzz
testing on Mailman. If anyone's interested, this might be a tool worth
trying out:
Forwarded Message
Subject:[Python-Dev] [ANNOUNCE] fuzzpy
Date: Sun, 28 Feb 2016 21:44:39 -0600
From: Brian C
On 2016-02-28 1:34 PM, aahan bhatt wrote:
Please explain about the gitlab integration in layman terms. I would like
to contribute to the project.
Gitlab integration can mean a lot of things, and we've left this
particular project pretty open to see what people will suggest.
The tweet linked
Hey Barry! I'm a few days late to respond to this, but I just wanted to
let you know I found this immensely useful, and my footer looks just
like how I want it to be :)
We are using Mailman 3 in production in a corporate environment. I'm
willing to deal with the re-structuring of Mailman when
On Feb 29, 2016, at 12:08 PM, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
>[Aside @Barry: what's the current state of DMARC handling in Mailman
>3? (I assume below that there isn't any yet.) I guess porting some
>or all of the Mailman 2 facilities be a good GSoC project?]
Correct!
Cheers,
-Barry
pgpS2KeCY9J
Hello devs,
Google is announcing the list of selected organisation for GSOC 16 in few
hours. Hope you all will like to join.
Mentor are welcome as they are needed to guide the students and students
are also welcome who would like to contribute. Think about the project idea
and post it to mailing
On Feb 27, 2016, at 02:02 PM, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
>I hope we haven't propagated this rather user-unfriendly interface
>(the convention of accepting both regexps and literals, distinguishing
>by "^" in column 0) to Mailman 3.
Sadly, it's true.
Mostly this is historical since we've essentia
On Feb 29, 2016, at 10:54 AM, treal tv wrote:
>We are using Mailman 3 in production in a corporate environment. I'm willing
>to deal with the re-structuring of Mailman when 3.1 comes around :)
Nice!
Cheers,
-Barry
___
Mailman-Developers mailing list
Ma
Barry Warsaw writes:
> IBan would need to have a flag which indicate whether the `email`
> is a literal address or a pattern. I don't think it's worth having
> two separate interfaces/models, but we might want to rename `email`
> to something more generic (`pattern` would be fine, with the
>
Hello everyone.
I am Jasvir Singh Grewal, a graduate student from CSU Long Beach. I am
feeling very excited to introduce myself on this mailing list. I have
been working on open source technologies since 3 years. Last 2 years I
have spent primarily working on Django and Python and it'll be a
pleasu
Jonas writes:
> On 28.02.2016 10:30, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
> > End-to-end encryption or signature or both seems to be the right
> > thing.
>
> The concept of a mailserver doesn't allow real end-to-end encryption if
> each recipient uses a different keypair.
It's true that keeping thi
On Mar 01, 2016, at 04:37 AM, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
>Are regexps sufficiently slow that *always* using a regexp would hurt
>performance?[1] The model I really had in mind was to always use
>regexps, and have a flag in the UI (Postorius) to regexp-quote when
>the user wants a literal.
I thin
Barry Warsaw writes:
> On Mar 01, 2016, at 04:37 AM, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
> >Or we could continue to have the core representation be "leading '^'
> >iff regexp", and once again have Postorius prepend "^.*" or whatever.
>
> In which case, the core's model wouldn't have to change, right?
Hello all,
For those who don't know me, I was a part of GSoC 2015 with Mailman, I
worked on the dynamic sublists aka dlist project. Terri and Steve mentored
me for this project and except for the timezone issue, I felt the
mentorship was one of the best experiences I have had in past few years,
A
I went through the slide "
https://speakerdeck.com/pyconslides/internationalization-and-localization-done-right-by-ruchi-varshney
" and then also through ZANATA webpage. I believe that i would be able to
work on this issue, to get start to contribute to Mailman
_
On 02/28/2016 03:32 PM, Mark Sapiro wrote:
>
> I am pleased to announce the release of Mailman 2.1.21.
It always happens. The only question is how. The thing is discovery of a
bug immediately after a release. This time the how was my PGP signature
being broken in the outgoing messages from 2 of
19 matches
Mail list logo
