[Mailman-Developers] Refried "SPAM" for GSoC 2016

2016-02-09 Thread Stephen J. Turnbull
The classic article on writing GSoC proposals, updated a bit for 2016, refactored for Moin (does Moin do ReST? the biggest annoyance was repeating links in several places) and moved to the Wiki. http://wiki.list.org/DEV/SPAM, reviews welcome. Or just fix what's broke. ;-) Steve

Re: [Mailman-Developers] Refried "SPAM" for GSoC 2016

2016-02-09 Thread Mark Sapiro
On 02/09/2016 11:31 AM, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote: > (does Moin do ReST? the biggest annoyance was > repeating links in several places) Yes it does. You can specify that the markup for an entire page is ReST by putting a #format rst line at the top of the page. You can embed ReST sections with

Re: [Mailman-Developers] Regarding Issue #126 ·

2016-02-09 Thread Barry Warsaw
On Feb 02, 2016, at 10:37 PM, Aswin kumar wrote: >I would like to know if this Issue #126 · is still open? Is it related to the >merge request Merge Request #51 ? Yes. MR#51 is still labeled WIP (work-in-progress) so I haven't considered merging it yet. It also has some merge conflicts; it prob

Re: [Mailman-Developers] Refried "SPAM" for GSoC 2016

2016-02-09 Thread Stephen J. Turnbull
Mark Sapiro writes: > On 02/09/2016 11:31 AM, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote: > > (does Moin do ReST? the biggest annoyance was > > repeating links in several places) > > Yes it does. Thanks for the confirmation! I should have guessed that (and figured out where to look for docs, it's in the edi

Re: [Mailman-Developers] Refried "SPAM" for GSoC 2016

2016-02-09 Thread Barry Warsaw
On Feb 10, 2016, at 11:45 AM, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote: >The more important questions are "would anybody be hindered in editing >pages if some pages were in ReST syntax and others in Moin?" and "is >there a significant constituency for ReST?" > >I do think ReST is both more readable and more powe

Re: [Mailman-Developers] GSOC 2016

2016-02-09 Thread Aditya Divekar
On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 10:50 PM, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote: > Aditya Divekar writes: > > > And I had previously mailed you directly, but I think I missed you > > there. So I mailed it again here. > > No, I've just been really busy with work, and a very bad cold, > sleeping about 2 hours/day more t