Hi !
On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 6:20 AM, Barry Warsaw wrote:
>Bhavesh, can you describe why a task model in the core is a better way to
> go?
>
>
I thought of implementing the model in core in the first place because I
thought it may
would have been good to have the user tasks available on hand eve
On May 26, 2015, at 01:26 PM, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
>I really think we should reserve 3.1 for fixing major problems (and I expect
>to have a lot of user-noticable problems, starting with lots of Mailman 2
>functionality that went unimplemented for one reason or another).
+1.
I do intend to
