bgergely0 wrote:
Looks like the code formatting bot is broken, but the patch is formatted
locally.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/165227
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/
jthackray wrote:
> had to manually cherry pick as the merge script expects the PR to come from a
> branch on a fork and not a branch on the LLVM repo. Commit is
> [04102d9](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/04102d998d0e4019c26654cf0b545a0af19819c7).
Thanks @c-rhodes - apologies, I'll
c-rhodes wrote:
had to manually cherry pick as the merge script expects the PR to come from a
branch on a fork and not a branch on the LLVM repo. Commit is
04102d998d0e4019c26654cf0b545a0af19819c7.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/164950
___
skc7 wrote:
Hi @kevinsala
emitTargetCall in ompIRBuilder.cpp is populating the TargetKernelArgs, which
contain your newly added DynCGroupMemFallback and DynCGGroupMem. These could be
given as input arguments to emitTargetCall.
OpenMPIRBuilder::createTarget inturn calls emitTargetCall. So, w
https://github.com/aengelke created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/165257
Add a mechanism to permit plugins running code between optimizations and
the back-end passes.
The primary motivation for this point is TPDE-LLVM, which substitutes
the LLVM back-end (optionally falling back to
@@ -1126,13 +1130,23 @@ PreservedAnalyses ExpandFpPass::run(Function &F,
FunctionAnalysisManager &FAM) {
AssumptionCache *AC = nullptr;
if (OptLevel != CodeGenOptLevel::None)
AC = &FAM.getResult(F);
+
+ auto &MAMProxy = FAM.getResult(F);
+ const RTLIB::RuntimeLibcall
https://github.com/compnerd approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/165196
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/jvoung approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/163894
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
eddyz87 wrote:
> seems like quite a large change, although it is restricted to the BPF
> backend. @eddyz87 @yonghong-song what do you think about backporting this?
I agree with Yonghong, the changes should be fine to backport.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/165154
__
https://github.com/eddyz87 approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/165154
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/inbelic updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/164292
>From 868c42bbd41aae5c43c89dd653d949418ec914f1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Finn Plummer
Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2025 10:17:32 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 01/15] [DirectX] add a DXILValidateMetadata pass
---
llvm/docs/D
@@ -602,18 +602,28 @@ def executeBuiltinUlimit(cmd, shenv):
"""executeBuiltinUlimit - Change the current limits."""
if os.name != "posix":
raise InternalShellError(cmd, "'ulimit' not supported on this system")
+# Import resource here after we confirm we are
https://github.com/aokblast updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/165279
>From a5ac1cbf6eab90416998ffce7f76c8b86fe44595 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: ShengYi Hung
Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2025 00:43:53 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] [llvm-readobj] Fix the test case
This patch is to reflect the c
https://github.com/boomanaiden154 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/165140
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/boomanaiden154 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/165140
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/boomanaiden154 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/165142
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/boomanaiden154 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/165142
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/boomanaiden154 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/165123
>From d34141d561067728d0954ffd574a973f21691e3e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Aiden Grossman
Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2025 08:29:41 +
Subject: [PATCH] fix
Created using spr 1.3.7
---
llvm/utils/lit/lit/Tes
https://github.com/boomanaiden154 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/165123
>From d34141d561067728d0954ffd574a973f21691e3e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Aiden Grossman
Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2025 08:29:41 +
Subject: [PATCH] fix
Created using spr 1.3.7
---
llvm/utils/lit/lit/Tes
https://github.com/boomanaiden154 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/165141
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/boomanaiden154 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/165143
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/boomanaiden154 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/165141
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/boomanaiden154 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/165143
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/boomanaiden154 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/165145
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/boomanaiden154 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/165144
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/boomanaiden154 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/165144
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/boomanaiden154 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/165145
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/boomanaiden154 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/165146
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/boomanaiden154 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/165146
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/boomanaiden154 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/165148
>From e90f11ccc5e29f48dab9a7a0931719fef0ca3eeb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Aiden Grossman
Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2025 13:08:11 +
Subject: [PATCH] formatting
Created using spr 1.3.7
---
compiler-rt/tes
https://github.com/boomanaiden154 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/165148
>From e90f11ccc5e29f48dab9a7a0931719fef0ca3eeb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Aiden Grossman
Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2025 13:08:11 +
Subject: [PATCH] formatting
Created using spr 1.3.7
---
compiler-rt/tes
https://github.com/boomanaiden154 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/165147
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/boomanaiden154 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/165147
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
boomanaiden154 wrote:
> Do you know roughly how many tests are affected? If it's not too many maybe
> we should simply XFAIL them for LLVM libc and update them as new features get
> implemented?
There are a couple hundred currently. Most are due to
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/
https://github.com/c-rhodes updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/164384
>From cd7d2db5a50cad76ad991d803ee645ba733c88a0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: David Spickett
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2025 09:54:16 +
Subject: [PATCH] [lld][test] Fix AArch64 build attribute test cleanup
MIME-Vers
https://github.com/c-rhodes closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/164384
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
Author: David Spickett
Date: 2025-10-27T10:09:34Z
New Revision: cd7d2db5a50cad76ad991d803ee645ba733c88a0
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/cd7d2db5a50cad76ad991d803ee645ba733c88a0
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/cd7d2db5a50cad76ad991d803ee645ba733c88a0.diff
LOG
github-actions[bot] wrote:
@DavidSpickett (or anyone else). If you would like to add a note about this fix
in the release notes (completely optional). Please reply to this comment with a
one or two sentence description of the fix. When you are done, please add the
release:note label to this P
github-actions[bot] wrote:
@cor3ntin (or anyone else). If you would like to add a note about this fix in
the release notes (completely optional). Please reply to this comment with a
one or two sentence description of the fix. When you are done, please add the
release:note label to this PR.
https://github.com/c-rhodes updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/162697
>From 9faef12c7209a951d7cb757e031f53eacc886a51 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Kees Cook
Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2025 00:49:57 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] [sancov] Fix stack-depth tracking to use debug locations
(#162428)
Author: Kees Cook
Date: 2025-10-27T10:00:09Z
New Revision: 9faef12c7209a951d7cb757e031f53eacc886a51
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/9faef12c7209a951d7cb757e031f53eacc886a51
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/9faef12c7209a951d7cb757e031f53eacc886a51.diff
LOG: [sa
https://github.com/c-rhodes closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/162697
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
Author: Abhishek Kaushik
Date: 2025-10-27T10:02:03Z
New Revision: 2cdfa9d9383c165f68a41a145c21d7f523485a8d
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/2cdfa9d9383c165f68a41a145c21d7f523485a8d
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/2cdfa9d9383c165f68a41a145c21d7f523485a8d.diff
L
c-rhodes wrote:
@nikic are you happy with this now? Looks like the test issue has been resolved.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/164354
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mai
Author: Corentin Jabot
Date: 2025-10-27T10:19:33Z
New Revision: 5c802f9eac663ceb59d2fa68c1afa6bdd2aac680
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/5c802f9eac663ceb59d2fa68c1afa6bdd2aac680
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/5c802f9eac663ceb59d2fa68c1afa6bdd2aac680.diff
LOG
https://github.com/c-rhodes closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/164654
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/c-rhodes updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/164654
>From 5c802f9eac663ceb59d2fa68c1afa6bdd2aac680 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Corentin Jabot
Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2025 09:26:22 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] [Clang] Do not warn on UTF-16 -> UTF-32 conversions.
(#163927
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-bolt
Author: Gergely Bálint (bgergely0)
Changes
BOLT currently ignores functions with synchronous PAuth DWARF info.
When more than 10% of functions get ignored for inconsistencies, we
should emit a warning to only use asynchronous unwind tables.
See als
https://github.com/c-rhodes closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/164497
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
jayfoad wrote:
Can you say anything at all about _why_ this is done?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/165035
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-co
vgvassilev wrote:
> > do you use a plugin to swap clang's CodeGen
>
> We swap LLVM's CodeGen (the machine code generation part), but want to keep
> Clang's CodeGen (the part that generates LLVM IR and optimizes that). We want
> the front-end and middle-end optimizations to behave as usual and
vgvassilev wrote:
> PluginASTAction would essentially require us to copy large parts of
> CodeGenAction.cpp
Do you mean that you will need to wrap clang's `BackendConsumer` into a
`MultiplexConsumer` and overwrite its `HandleTranslationUnit` swapping
`BackendConsumer::HandleTranslationUnit`'s
https://github.com/c-rhodes updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/164497
>From 1600cf0405844880def09cef3290f77d76a8e64b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Aiden Grossman
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2025 14:04:03 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] [Github] Only look at previous commit for MacOS Premerge
(#16
https://github.com/bgergely0 ready_for_review
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/165227
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
bgergely0 wrote:
> [!WARNING]
> This pull request is not mergeable via GitHub because a downstack PR is
> open. Once all requirements are satisfied, merge this PR as a stack href="https://app.graphite.dev/github/pr/llvm/llvm-project/165227?utm_source=stack-comment-downstack-mergeability-warning
https://github.com/bgergely0 created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/165227
BOLT currently ignores functions with synchronous PAuth DWARF info.
When more than 10% of functions get ignored for inconsistencies, we
should emit a warning to only use asynchronous unwind tables.
See also: #
Author: Jonathan Thackray
Date: 2025-10-27T11:04:01Z
New Revision: 04102d998d0e4019c26654cf0b545a0af19819c7
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/04102d998d0e4019c26654cf0b545a0af19819c7
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/04102d998d0e4019c26654cf0b545a0af19819c7.diff
https://github.com/c-rhodes closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/164950
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
github-actions[bot] wrote:
@tstellar (or anyone else). If you would like to add a note about this fix in
the release notes (completely optional). Please reply to this comment with a
one or two sentence description of the fix. When you are done, please add the
release:note label to this PR.
aengelke wrote:
> Would it make more sense to make the CodeGenAction and emitBackendOutput more
> flexible?
Maybe? emitBackendOutput (EmitAssemblyHelper) could call back into some new
virtual method in BackendConsumer. This would leave the problem of inserting a
new different (subclass of) Ba
philnik777 wrote:
> This still needs some work. Then there is still quite a bit of functionality
> needed in libc to get the tests passing for `check-cxx` (`check-cxxabi`
> already works). But once this is ready, I think landing it would probably
> make sense so there is a central configuratio
Author: Nikolas Klauser
Date: 2025-10-27T16:50:59+01:00
New Revision: 4635eba5d95e528477c3793fda55c91af0423457
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/4635eba5d95e528477c3793fda55c91af0423457
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/4635eba5d95e528477c3793fda55c91af0423457.dif
https://github.com/c-rhodes updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/164076
>From 2cdfa9d9383c165f68a41a145c21d7f523485a8d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Abhishek Kaushik
Date: Sat, 18 Oct 2025 02:30:18 +0530
Subject: [PATCH] [X86] Use pseudo instructions to zero registers in
`buildCl
https://github.com/c-rhodes closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/164076
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/c-rhodes closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/164538
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
github-actions[bot] wrote:
@boomanaiden154 (or anyone else). If you would like to add a note about this
fix in the release notes (completely optional). Please reply to this comment
with a one or two sentence description of the fix. When you are done, please
add the release:note label to this
https://github.com/fmayer approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/165142
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/fmayer approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/165141
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/fmayer approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/165143
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/fmayer approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/165144
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/fmayer approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/165145
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/fmayer approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/165146
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/ilovepi approved this pull request.
LGTM. I don't have a strong opinion on the one import I commented on.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/165123
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https:
@@ -602,18 +602,28 @@ def executeBuiltinUlimit(cmd, shenv):
"""executeBuiltinUlimit - Change the current limits."""
if os.name != "posix":
raise InternalShellError(cmd, "'ulimit' not supported on this system")
+# Import resource here after we confirm we are
https://github.com/ilovepi edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/165123
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/ylzsx created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/165217
None
>From ddd5b937312782e9b1182d253ec96ef52661f764 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: yangzhaoxin
Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2025 16:41:41 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] [LoongArch] Make ceil,floor,trunc,roundeven legal for
lsx/las
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-backend-loongarch
Author: Zhaoxin Yang (ylzsx)
Changes
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/165217.diff
5 Files Affected:
- (modified) llvm/lib/Target/LoongArch/LoongArchISelLowering.cpp (+8)
- (modified) llvm/lib/Target/LoongAr
c-rhodes wrote:
seems like quite a large change, although it is restricted to the BPF backend.
@eddyz87 @yonghong-song what do you think about backporting this?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/165154
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm
c-rhodes wrote:
> sidenote: updated release notes on the maintenance branches almost never get
> published (though they should).
I'm new to release maintenance so this is new to me, thanks for mentioning.
I'll raise it with the other release maintainers.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/
@@ -84,7 +84,22 @@ void MCSymbol::print(raw_ostream &OS, const MCAsmInfo *MAI)
const {
}
#if !defined(NDEBUG) || defined(LLVM_ENABLE_DUMP)
-LLVM_DUMP_METHOD void MCSymbol::dump() const {
- dbgs() << *this;
-}
+LLVM_DUMP_METHOD void MCSymbol::dump() const { dbgs() << *this; }
https://github.com/hekota approved this pull request.
LGTM!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/164292
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
@@ -314,25 +327,122 @@ static void translateBranchMetadata(Module &M,
Instruction *BBTerminatorInst) {
BBTerminatorInst->setMetadata("hlsl.controlflow.hint", nullptr);
}
-static std::array getCompatibleInstructionMDs(llvm::Module &M) {
+// Determines if the metadata node wi
@@ -47,16 +48,28 @@ class DiagnosticInfoTranslateMD : public DiagnosticInfo {
/// \p M is the module for which the diagnostic is being emitted. \p Msg is
/// the message to show. Note that this class does not copy this message, so
/// this reference must be valid for the
@@ -24,9 +24,9 @@ _Z4mainDv3_j.exit:; preds =
%for.body.i, %entry
; These next check lines check that only the range metadata remains
; No more metadata should be necessary, the rest (the current 0 and 1)
; should be removed.
-; CHECK-NOT: !{!"l
@@ -389,31 +499,23 @@ static void translateGlobalMetadata(Module &M,
DXILResourceMap &DRM,
uint64_t CombinedMask = ShaderFlags.getCombinedFlags();
EntryFnMDNodes.emplace_back(
emitTopLevelLibraryNode(M, ResourceMD, CombinedMask));
- } else if (MMDI.EntryProper
@@ -314,25 +327,122 @@ static void translateBranchMetadata(Module &M,
Instruction *BBTerminatorInst) {
BBTerminatorInst->setMetadata("hlsl.controlflow.hint", nullptr);
}
-static std::array getCompatibleInstructionMDs(llvm::Module &M) {
+// Determines if the metadata node wi
https://github.com/inbelic edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/164292
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
@@ -314,25 +327,122 @@ static void translateBranchMetadata(Module &M,
Instruction *BBTerminatorInst) {
BBTerminatorInst->setMetadata("hlsl.controlflow.hint", nullptr);
}
-static std::array getCompatibleInstructionMDs(llvm::Module &M) {
+// Determines if the metadata node wi
@@ -24,9 +24,9 @@ _Z4mainDv3_j.exit:; preds =
%for.body.i, %entry
; These next check lines check that only the range metadata remains
; No more metadata should be necessary, the rest (the current 0 and 1)
; should be removed.
-; CHECK-NOT: !{!"l
https://github.com/zhaoqi5 approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/165217
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
yonghong-song wrote:
So looks like llvm21 will have an assertion for rust if without backport. Does
it have problems before llvm21 say llvm20? In general, I am okay with backport
so llvm21 can work for rust bpf part as llvm22 may need some time to be
available.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-pr
aengelke wrote:
> do you use a plugin to swap clang's CodeGen
We swap LLVM's CodeGen (the machine code generation part), but want to keep
Clang's CodeGen (the part that generates LLVM IR and optimizes that). We want
the front-end and middle-end optimizations to behave as usual and only replace
vadorovsky wrote:
> So looks like llvm21 will have an assertion for rust if without backport.
Yes, exactly.
> Does it have problems before llvm21 say llvm20?
Yes, the same problem occurs on LLVM 20 and earlier versions as well. But given
that the Rust 1.91.0-beta is already using LLVM 21 and
https://github.com/boomanaiden154 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/165148
>From e90f11ccc5e29f48dab9a7a0931719fef0ca3eeb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Aiden Grossman
Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2025 13:08:11 +
Subject: [PATCH] formatting
Created using spr 1.3.7
---
compiler-rt/tes
https://github.com/boomanaiden154 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/165113
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/boomanaiden154 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/165113
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
github-actions[bot] wrote:
@nathanchance (or anyone else). If you would like to add a note about this fix
in the release notes (completely optional). Please reply to this comment with a
one or two sentence description of the fix. When you are done, please add the
release:note label to this PR
github-actions[bot] wrote:
@RKSimon (or anyone else). If you would like to add a note about this fix in
the release notes (completely optional). Please reply to this comment with a
one or two sentence description of the fix. When you are done, please add the
release:note label to this PR.
h
https://github.com/c-rhodes updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/164538
>From e94561caef487fbbadb50ad66ef2b21529aa388a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Tom Stellard
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2025 19:26:56 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] workflows/release-documentation: Allow secrets pass through
fro
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-llvm-binary-utilities
Author: None (aokblast)
Changes
FreeBSD coredump uses program headers to store mmap information. It is possible
for program to use more than PN_XNUM mmaps. Therefore, we implement the support
of PN_XNUM in readelf.
---
Full diff:
1 - 100 of 107 matches
Mail list logo
