https://github.com/tru updated https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102770
>From efdd0e9fda292f9040367fcd6a9b2c2590fea739 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Owen Pan
Date: Sat, 10 Aug 2024 13:31:35 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] [clang-format] Fix a serious bug in `git clang-format -f`
(#102629)
With
Author: Owen Pan
Date: 2024-08-13T09:00:45+02:00
New Revision: efdd0e9fda292f9040367fcd6a9b2c2590fea739
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/efdd0e9fda292f9040367fcd6a9b2c2590fea739
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/efdd0e9fda292f9040367fcd6a9b2c2590fea739.diff
LOG:
https://github.com/tru closed https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102770
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
github-actions[bot] wrote:
@owenca (or anyone else). If you would like to add a note about this fix in the
release notes (completely optional). Please reply to this comment with a one or
two sentence description of the fix. When you are done, please add the
release:note label to this PR.
ht
https://github.com/tru updated https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102895
>From c261de724b01a1db029d896914adc8995cd2c35a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Pavel Labath
Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2024 10:53:15 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] [lldb] Fix crash when adding members to an "incomplete" type
(#102116)
Author: Pavel Labath
Date: 2024-08-13T09:02:18+02:00
New Revision: c261de724b01a1db029d896914adc8995cd2c35a
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/c261de724b01a1db029d896914adc8995cd2c35a
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/c261de724b01a1db029d896914adc8995cd2c35a.diff
https://github.com/tru closed https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102895
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/tru updated https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102938
>From 955fe3f1ef193d26c73fb54ab6e01a818a6bde8e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ahmed Bougacha
Date: Fri, 9 Aug 2024 12:32:01 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] [clang] Implement -fptrauth-auth-traps. (#102417)
This provides -fpt
https://github.com/tru closed https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102938
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
Author: Ahmed Bougacha
Date: 2024-08-13T09:02:58+02:00
New Revision: 955fe3f1ef193d26c73fb54ab6e01a818a6bde8e
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/955fe3f1ef193d26c73fb54ab6e01a818a6bde8e
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/955fe3f1ef193d26c73fb54ab6e01a818a6bde8e.diff
github-actions[bot] wrote:
@labath (or anyone else). If you would like to add a note about this fix in the
release notes (completely optional). Please reply to this comment with a one or
two sentence description of the fix. When you are done, please add the
release:note label to this PR.
ht
github-actions[bot] wrote:
@asl (or anyone else). If you would like to add a note about this fix in the
release notes (completely optional). Please reply to this comment with a one or
two sentence description of the fix. When you are done, please add the
release:note label to this PR.
https
tru wrote:
What's the state of this one?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/100216
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
tru wrote:
Should this still be merged? Who needs to review it? cc @topperc
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/101506
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-b
https://github.com/ssahasra created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/103014
1. CycleInfo efficiently locates all cycles in a single pass, while the SCC is
repeated inside every natural loop.
2. CycleInfo provides a hierarchy of irreducible cycles, and the new
implementation transform
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-llvm-adt
Author: Sameer Sahasrabuddhe (ssahasra)
Changes
1. CycleInfo efficiently locates all cycles in a single pass, while the SCC is
repeated inside every natural loop.
2. CycleInfo provides a hierarchy of irreducible cycles, and the new
implementa
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-backend-amdgpu
Author: Sameer Sahasrabuddhe (ssahasra)
Changes
1. CycleInfo efficiently locates all cycles in a single pass, while the SCC is
repeated inside every natural loop.
2. CycleInfo provides a hierarchy of irreducible cycles, and the new
impl
https://github.com/tru updated https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102052
>From 5230e327a10023b4349474bd89d67f8a1764c648 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Mitch Phillips
Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2024 12:58:24 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] Revert "[libc++][math] Fix undue overflowing of
`std::hypot(x,y
Author: Mitch Phillips
Date: 2024-08-13T09:07:01+02:00
New Revision: 5230e327a10023b4349474bd89d67f8a1764c648
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/5230e327a10023b4349474bd89d67f8a1764c648
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/5230e327a10023b4349474bd89d67f8a1764c648.diff
Author: PaulXiCao
Date: 2024-08-13T09:07:01+02:00
New Revision: 2c29bd3d4cdf8b81ebeb8e562fbc91f63a90a1ad
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/2c29bd3d4cdf8b81ebeb8e562fbc91f63a90a1ad
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/2c29bd3d4cdf8b81ebeb8e562fbc91f63a90a1ad.diff
LOG
https://github.com/tru closed https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102052
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
tru wrote:
@zygoloid @RKSimon @phoebewang does this look good to merge?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102070
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch
github-actions[bot] wrote:
@ldionne (or anyone else). If you would like to add a note about this fix in
the release notes (completely optional). Please reply to this comment with a
one or two sentence description of the fix. When you are done, please add the
release:note label to this PR.
h
tru wrote:
@SundeepKushwaha should this be merged?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102179
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/tru updated https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102425
>From 3f193bcc5a72f05a4b2d5f74a0ee16a76b3b32f2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Chuanqi Xu
Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2024 13:29:59 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] [C++20] [Modules] Don't diagnose duplicated implicit decl in
multiple na
Author: Chuanqi Xu
Date: 2024-08-13T09:08:58+02:00
New Revision: 3f193bcc5a72f05a4b2d5f74a0ee16a76b3b32f2
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/3f193bcc5a72f05a4b2d5f74a0ee16a76b3b32f2
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/3f193bcc5a72f05a4b2d5f74a0ee16a76b3b32f2.diff
LO
https://github.com/tru closed https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102425
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
tru wrote:
@AaronBallman can you have a look?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102514
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
github-actions[bot] wrote:
@ChuanqiXu9 (or anyone else). If you would like to add a note about this fix in
the release notes (completely optional). Please reply to this comment with a
one or two sentence description of the fix. When you are done, please add the
release:note label to this PR.
tru wrote:
@ChuanqiXu9 are we good to merge this? It seems like a pretty big patch but
reading the description it seems like some good fixes in there. Any risk taking
this on?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102561
___
llvm-branch-commits m
ChuanqiXu9 wrote:
> @ChuanqiXu9 are we good to merge this? It seems like a pretty big patch but
> reading the description it seems like some good fixes in there. Any risk
> taking this on?
Yes, this is not small. And I am 100% sure it is fine. But given this is
important, I still like to back
tru wrote:
That seems fine. We should have another 3 weeks before the final is released,
so if you have higher confidence before that we can merge.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102561
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commi
Author: Alexis Engelke
Date: 2024-08-13T07:50:05Z
New Revision: d0b1a582fd33e8c3605c027883c6deb35757f560
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/d0b1a582fd33e8c3605c027883c6deb35757f560
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/d0b1a582fd33e8c3605c027883c6deb35757f560.diff
LOG
https://github.com/ssahasra closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/103014
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
@@ -443,17 +446,24 @@ bool MCPseudoProbeDecoder::buildAddress2ProbeMap(
// If the incoming node is null, all its children nodes should be disgarded.
if (Cur) {
// Switch/add to a new tree node(inlinee)
-Cur = Cur->getOrAddNode(std::make_tuple(Guid, Index));
-Cur
@@ -106,3 +135,12 @@ Error
AMDGPUCodeGenPassBuilder::addInstSelector(AddMachinePass &addPass) const {
addPass(SILowerI1CopiesPass());
return Error::success();
}
+
+bool AMDGPUCodeGenPassBuilder::isPassEnabled(const cl::opt &Opt,
arsenm wrote:
> IMO adding
https://github.com/aaupov updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102789
>From ddcbb593f72ca47acaa82f9c14a7fd2c4e30903b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Amir Ayupov
Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2024 03:51:31 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] Pass CurChildIndex by value
Created using spr 1.3.4
---
llvm/incl
hazzlim wrote:
> > The patch here is pretty big in size, but it seems to only affects the
> > remarks, on the other hand it doesn't seem to really fix anything and in
> > that case I feel like RC3 might be the wrong time to merge this. Is there a
> > huge upside to take this this late in the p
https://github.com/AaronBallman approved this pull request.
LGTM!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102968
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commi
@@ -0,0 +1,341 @@
+//===- ControlFlowUtils.cpp - Control Flow Utilities
---==//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Ap
@@ -0,0 +1,341 @@
+//===- ControlFlowUtils.cpp - Control Flow Utilities
---==//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Ap
@@ -0,0 +1,341 @@
+//===- ControlFlowUtils.cpp - Control Flow Utilities
---==//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Ap
@@ -0,0 +1,341 @@
+//===- ControlFlowUtils.cpp - Control Flow Utilities
---==//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Ap
https://github.com/tru updated https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102968
>From 28f2d04b3ca36faffe997fa86833e5ed83699272 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Qiongsi Wu <274595+qiongs...@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2024 16:00:25 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] [AIX] Revert `#pragma mc_func
Author: Qiongsi Wu
Date: 2024-08-13T14:04:18+02:00
New Revision: 28f2d04b3ca36faffe997fa86833e5ed83699272
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/28f2d04b3ca36faffe997fa86833e5ed83699272
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/28f2d04b3ca36faffe997fa86833e5ed83699272.diff
LO
https://github.com/tru closed https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102968
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
github-actions[bot] wrote:
@qiongsiwu (or anyone else). If you would like to add a note about this fix in
the release notes (completely optional). Please reply to this comment with a
one or two sentence description of the fix. When you are done, please add the
release:note label to this PR.
https://github.com/jhuber6 approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/100216
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/llvmbot milestoned
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/103048
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
llvmbot wrote:
@efriedma-quic What do you think about merging this PR to the release branch?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/103048
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman
https://github.com/llvmbot created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/103048
Backport d550ada5ab6cd6e49de71ac4c9aa27ced4c11de0
Requested by: @cjacek
>From f1e58884bfc55c3ec83f3f882a4219bf48059fdc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jacek Caban
Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2024 13:39:42 +0200
Subject:
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-backend-aarch64
Author: None (llvmbot)
Changes
Backport d550ada5ab6cd6e49de71ac4c9aa27ced4c11de0
Requested by: @cjacek
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/103048.diff
2 Files Affected:
- (modified) llvm/lib/Target/AArch64/AArch6
https://github.com/AaronBallman approved this pull request.
LGTM
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102514
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commit
https://github.com/arsenm created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/103064
This was close to manually written full checks, and was missing
a change in a future commit.
>From b35e514f602290b5b3b5f85f1f2237f795c1e472 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Matt Arsenault
Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2024 14
https://github.com/arsenm ready_for_review
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/103064
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
arsenm wrote:
> [!WARNING]
> This pull request is not mergeable via GitHub because a downstack PR is
> open. Once all requirements are satisfied, merge this PR as a stack href="https://app.graphite.dev/github/pr/llvm/llvm-project/103064?utm_source=stack-comment-downstack-mergeability-warning";
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-llvm-transforms
Author: Matt Arsenault (arsenm)
Changes
This was close to manually written full checks, and was missing
a change in a future commit.
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/103064.diff
1 Files Affected:
- (modified) l
@@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
; NOTE: Assertions have been autogenerated by utils/update_test_checks.py
-; RUN: opt < %s -passes='lower-switch,fix-irreducible' -S | FileCheck %s
+; RUN: opt < %s -lowerswitch -fix-irreducible --verify-loop-info -S |
FileCheck %s
arsenm wrote:
@@ -140,53 +141,43 @@ static void restoreSSA(const DominatorTree &DT, const
Loop *L,
}
}
+static bool isExitBlock(Loop *L, BasicBlock *Succ, LoopInfo &LI) {
+ Loop *SL = LI.getLoopFor(Succ);
+ if (SL == L || L->contains(SL))
+return false;
+ return true;
@@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
; NOTE: Assertions have been autogenerated by utils/update_test_checks.py
-; RUN: opt < %s -passes='lower-switch,fix-irreducible' -S | FileCheck %s
+; RUN: opt < %s -lowerswitch -fix-irreducible --verify-loop-info -S |
FileCheck %s
+; RUN: opt < %s -passes="lower
https://github.com/arsenm created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/103211
The expansion for cmpxchg was trying to tidy up extractvalue users
to directly use the lowered pieces, and then erasing the now dead
extractvalues. This was making an assumption about the iteration
order did not d
arsenm wrote:
> [!WARNING]
> This pull request is not mergeable via GitHub because a downstack PR is
> open. Once all requirements are satisfied, merge this PR as a stack href="https://app.graphite.dev/github/pr/llvm/llvm-project/103211?utm_source=stack-comment-downstack-mergeability-warning";
https://github.com/arsenm ready_for_review
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/103211
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/llvmbot created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/103301
Backport d07f106e512c08455b76cc1889ee48318e73c810
Requested by: @syzaara
>From 84853313eed6b778285f6a1329837f2da0a5ff10 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Zaara Syeda
Date: Wed, 7 Aug 2024 09:59:45 -0400
Subject:
https://github.com/llvmbot milestoned
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/103301
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
llvmbot wrote:
@mandlebug What do you think about merging this PR to the release branch?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/103301
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/lis
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-backend-powerpc
Author: None (llvmbot)
Changes
Backport d07f106e512c08455b76cc1889ee48318e73c810
Requested by: @syzaara
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/103301.diff
2 Files Affected:
- (modified) llvm/lib/Target/PowerPC/PPCFr
https://github.com/mordante edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/101805
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/ldionne edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/101805
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/aengelke created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/103302
When looking at PHI operand for combining, only look at instructions and
arguments. The loop later iteraters over Arg's users, which is not
useful if Arg is a constant -- it's users are not meaningful and might
https://github.com/ldionne approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/101805
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
@@ -64,32 +64,14 @@ struct _LIBCPP_TEMPLATE_VIS formatter : public __formatte
template
_LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI typename _FormatContext::iterator format(const _CharT*
__str, _FormatContext& __ctx) const {
_LIBCPP_ASSERT_INTERNAL(__str, "The basic_format_arg constructor s
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-llvm-transforms
Author: Alexis Engelke (aengelke)
Changes
When looking at PHI operand for combining, only look at instructions and
arguments. The loop later iteraters over Arg's users, which is not
useful if Arg is a constant -- it's users are not meanin
@@ -64,32 +64,14 @@ struct _LIBCPP_TEMPLATE_VIS formatter : public __formatte
template
_LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI typename _FormatContext::iterator format(const _CharT*
__str, _FormatContext& __ctx) const {
_LIBCPP_ASSERT_INTERNAL(__str, "The basic_format_arg constructor s
https://github.com/ldionne edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/101817
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
@@ -0,0 +1,576 @@
+; NOTE: Assertions have been autogenerated by utils/update_test_checks.py
UTC_ARGS: --version 5
+; RUN: opt -mtriple=arm64
-passes='inline,function(sroa,jump-threading,instcombine)' -S < %s
| FileCheck %s
nikic wrote:
Why can't this be an in
https://github.com/aengelke updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/103302
>From 6a2ac00a8424a4402475e2b7972bfb01330c3bf8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Alexis Engelke
Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2024 16:10:38 +
Subject: [PATCH] Only run instcombine in test case
Created using spr 1.3.5-bog
@@ -0,0 +1,576 @@
+; NOTE: Assertions have been autogenerated by utils/update_test_checks.py
UTC_ARGS: --version 5
+; RUN: opt -mtriple=arm64
-passes='inline,function(sroa,jump-threading,instcombine)' -S < %s
| FileCheck %s
aengelke wrote:
True, changed
https
@@ -0,0 +1,918 @@
+; NOTE: Assertions have been autogenerated by utils/update_test_checks.py
UTC_ARGS: --version 5
+; RUN: opt -mtriple=arm64 -S < %s -passes=instcombine | FileCheck %s
nikic wrote:
Triple should not be needed.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-proje
nikic wrote:
This test still doesn't look anything approaching minimal. Please run it
through llvm-reduce.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/103302
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lis
https://github.com/topperc approved this pull request.
LGTM
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/101506
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/amy-kwan updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/101226
>From a5d47e331e3bd754db092c194a5ca5b25ff99011 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Amy Kwan
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2024 12:55:34 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] [PowerPC][GlobalMerge] Enable GlobalMerge by default on AIX
This pa
https://github.com/ldionne edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/101817
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
@@ -58,23 +59,156 @@ namespace __format {
/// This helper is used together with the @ref back_insert_iterator to offer
/// type-erasure for the formatting functions. This reduces the number to
/// template instantiations.
+///
+/// The design of the class is being changed to im
https://github.com/ldionne requested changes to this pull request.
As discussed, I think we should behave more like `std::vector` and not assume
that elements between `[size(), capacity())` are already initialized. IMO this
is a simpler mental model that is consistent with `std::vector` and I d
@@ -58,23 +59,156 @@ namespace __format {
/// This helper is used together with the @ref back_insert_iterator to offer
/// type-erasure for the formatting functions. This reduces the number to
/// template instantiations.
+///
+/// The design of the class is being changed to im
@@ -58,23 +59,156 @@ namespace __format {
/// This helper is used together with the @ref back_insert_iterator to offer
/// type-erasure for the formatting functions. This reduces the number to
/// template instantiations.
+///
+/// The design of the class is being changed to im
@@ -499,11 +652,78 @@ struct _LIBCPP_TEMPLATE_VIS __format_to_n_buffer final
_LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI auto __make_output_iterator() { return
this->__output_.__make_output_iterator(); }
_LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI format_to_n_result<_OutIt> __result() && {
-this->__output_.__fl
@@ -58,23 +59,156 @@ namespace __format {
/// This helper is used together with the @ref back_insert_iterator to offer
/// type-erasure for the formatting functions. This reduces the number to
/// template instantiations.
+///
+/// The design of the class is being changed to im
@@ -58,23 +59,156 @@ namespace __format {
/// This helper is used together with the @ref back_insert_iterator to offer
/// type-erasure for the formatting functions. This reduces the number to
/// template instantiations.
+///
+/// The design of the class is being changed to im
@@ -58,23 +59,156 @@ namespace __format {
/// This helper is used together with the @ref back_insert_iterator to offer
/// type-erasure for the formatting functions. This reduces the number to
/// template instantiations.
+///
+/// The design of the class is being changed to im
@@ -58,23 +59,156 @@ namespace __format {
/// This helper is used together with the @ref back_insert_iterator to offer
/// type-erasure for the formatting functions. This reduces the number to
/// template instantiations.
+///
+/// The design of the class is being changed to im
@@ -58,23 +59,156 @@ namespace __format {
/// This helper is used together with the @ref back_insert_iterator to offer
/// type-erasure for the formatting functions. This reduces the number to
/// template instantiations.
+///
+/// The design of the class is being changed to im
@@ -499,11 +652,78 @@ struct _LIBCPP_TEMPLATE_VIS __format_to_n_buffer final
_LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI auto __make_output_iterator() { return
this->__output_.__make_output_iterator(); }
_LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI format_to_n_result<_OutIt> __result() && {
-this->__output_.__fl
@@ -452,9 +452,9 @@ format_to(_OutIt __out_it, wformat_string<_Args...> __fmt,
_Args&&... __args) {
// fires too eagerly, see http://llvm.org/PR61563.
template
[[nodiscard]] _LIBCPP_ALWAYS_INLINE inline _LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI string
vformat(string_view __fmt, format_args __ar
@@ -499,11 +652,78 @@ struct _LIBCPP_TEMPLATE_VIS __format_to_n_buffer final
_LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI auto __make_output_iterator() { return
this->__output_.__make_output_iterator(); }
_LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI format_to_n_result<_OutIt> __result() && {
-this->__output_.__fl
https://github.com/aengelke updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/103302
>From 6a2ac00a8424a4402475e2b7972bfb01330c3bf8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Alexis Engelke
Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2024 16:10:38 +
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] Only run instcombine in test case
Created using spr 1.3.5
aengelke wrote:
Done. Fun fact, llvm-reduce crashed on the input due to this bug.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/103302
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.
https://github.com/mandlebug approved this pull request.
LGTM.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/103301
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/ldionne approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/103003
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
1 - 100 of 132 matches
Mail list logo
