[llvm-branch-commits] [clang] [Serialization] Load Specialization Lazily (2/2) (PR #77417)

ChuanqiXu9 wrote: > @ChuanqiXu9, I managed to push the commit here back to #76774 and we can > continue the discussion there. Would that be sufficient? The intention of split the patch is to ease the reviewing. If you are glad to do that, yes, it will be pretty good : ) https://github.com/llv

[llvm-branch-commits] [clang] [Serialization] Load Specialization Lazily (2/2) (PR #77417)

https://github.com/ChuanqiXu9 closed https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77417 ___ llvm-branch-commits mailing list llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits

[llvm-branch-commits] [clang] [Serialization] Load Specialization Lazily (2/2) (PR #77417)

ChuanqiXu9 wrote: Then this is not needed as far as I understood. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77417 ___ llvm-branch-commits mailing list llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commit

[llvm-branch-commits] [libcxx] [libc++][modules] Adds module testing. (PR #76246)

https://github.com/ldionne edited https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76246 ___ llvm-branch-commits mailing list llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits

[llvm-branch-commits] [libcxx] [libc++][modules] Adds module testing. (PR #76246)

@@ -131,13 +138,65 @@ def parseScript(test, preamble): script += preamble script += scriptInTest +has_std_module = False +has_std_compat_module = False +for module in modules: +if module == "std": +has_std_module = True +elif mod

[llvm-branch-commits] [libcxx] [libc++][modules] Adds module testing. (PR #76246)

@@ -131,13 +138,65 @@ def parseScript(test, preamble): script += preamble script += scriptInTest +has_std_module = False +has_std_compat_module = False +for module in modules: +if module == "std": +has_std_module = True +elif mod

[llvm-branch-commits] [libcxx] [libc++][modules] Adds module testing. (PR #76246)

https://github.com/ldionne requested changes to this pull request. This generally looks good to me, but I have some feedback per our live review! Thanks, this is a great simplification overall. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76246 ___ llvm-

[llvm-branch-commits] [libcxx] [libc++][modules] Adds module testing. (PR #76246)

@@ -131,13 +138,65 @@ def parseScript(test, preamble): script += preamble script += scriptInTest +has_std_module = False +has_std_compat_module = False +for module in modules: +if module == "std": +has_std_module = True +elif mod

[llvm-branch-commits] [libcxx] [libc++][modules] Adds module testing. (PR #76246)

@@ -317,6 +317,18 @@ def _getAndroidDeviceApi(cfg): AddSubstitution("%{clang-tidy}", lambda cfg: _getSuitableClangTidy(cfg)) ], ), +# Whether module support for the platform is available. +Feature( +name="has-no-module-support", +

[llvm-branch-commits] [libcxx] [libc++][modules] Adds module testing. (PR #76246)

@@ -131,13 +138,65 @@ def parseScript(test, preamble): script += preamble script += scriptInTest +has_std_module = False +has_std_compat_module = False +for module in modules: +if module == "std": +has_std_module = True +elif mod

[llvm-branch-commits] [libcxx] [libc++][modules] Adds module testing. (PR #76246)

@@ -131,13 +138,65 @@ def parseScript(test, preamble): script += preamble script += scriptInTest +has_std_module = False +has_std_compat_module = False +for module in modules: +if module == "std": +has_std_module = True +elif mod

[llvm-branch-commits] [libcxx] [libc++][modules] Adds module testing. (PR #76246)

@@ -223,6 +283,12 @@ class CxxStandardLibraryTest(lit.formats.FileBasedTest): allows adding special compilation flags without having to use a .sh.cpp test, which would be more powerful but perhaps overkill. +// MODULE: std std.compat ---

[llvm-branch-commits] [libcxx] [libc++][modules] Adds module testing. (PR #76246)

@@ -223,6 +283,12 @@ class CxxStandardLibraryTest(lit.formats.FileBasedTest): allows adding special compilation flags without having to use a .sh.cpp test, which would be more powerful but perhaps overkill. +// MODULE: std std.compat + +

[llvm-branch-commits] [libcxx] [libc++][modules] Adds module testing. (PR #76246)

@@ -317,6 +317,18 @@ def _getAndroidDeviceApi(cfg): AddSubstitution("%{clang-tidy}", lambda cfg: _getSuitableClangTidy(cfg)) ], ), +# Whether module support for the platform is available. +Feature( +name="has-no-module-support",

[llvm-branch-commits] [libcxx] [libc++][modules] Fixes clang-tidy exports. (PR #76288)

https://github.com/ldionne edited https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76288 ___ llvm-branch-commits mailing list llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits

[llvm-branch-commits] [libcxx] [libc++][modules] Fixes clang-tidy exports. (PR #76288)

https://github.com/ldionne approved this pull request. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76288 ___ llvm-branch-commits mailing list llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits

[llvm-branch-commits] [libcxx] [libc++][modules] Improves std.compat module. (PR #76330)

https://github.com/ldionne commented: This generally looks OK to me, but I'd like to see it once the parent patches have landed. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76330 ___ llvm-branch-commits mailing list llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org ht

[llvm-branch-commits] [libcxx] [libc++][modules] Improves std.compat module. (PR #76330)

https://github.com/ldionne approved this pull request. I guess I don't actually need to see this again if the CI passes once this is rebased on top of the parent changes. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76330 ___ llvm-branch-commits mailing

[llvm-branch-commits] [libcxx] [llvm] [libc++][modules] Adds module testing. (PR #76246)

@@ -131,13 +138,65 @@ def parseScript(test, preamble): script += preamble script += scriptInTest +has_std_module = False +has_std_compat_module = False +for module in modules: +if module == "std": +has_std_module = True +elif mod

[llvm-branch-commits] [lld] [llvm] [RISCV] Support RISC-V TLSDESC in LLD (PR #77516)

https://github.com/ilovepi created https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77516 This patch adds support for RISC-V TLSDESC relocations, as described in https://github.com/riscv-non-isa/riscv-elf-psabi-doc/pull/373. It does not attempt to handle relaxation for these cases, which will be handl

[llvm-branch-commits] [lld] [llvm] [RISCV] Support RISC-V TLSDESC in LLD (PR #77516)

llvmbot wrote: @llvm/pr-subscribers-lld @llvm/pr-subscribers-lld-elf Author: Paul Kirth (ilovepi) Changes This patch adds support for RISC-V TLSDESC relocations, as described in https://github.com/riscv-non-isa/riscv-elf-psabi-doc/pull/373. It does not attempt to handle relaxation for the

[llvm-branch-commits] [libcxx] [libc++][modules] Adds module testing. (PR #76246)

https://github.com/mordante updated https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76246 >From 196cedd36534b02a7c55cf4a1746b34f87ead467 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Mark de Wever Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2023 20:43:38 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [libc++][modules] Adds module testing. This adds a new modu

[llvm-branch-commits] [lld] [llvm] [RISCV] Support RISC-V TLSDESC in LLD (PR #77516)

https://github.com/ilovepi updated https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77516 >From ed9f0c9de1e8f75acdae90ef714323147539d215 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Paul Kirth Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2024 22:50:19 + Subject: [PATCH] Add checks for both local and global accesses Created using spr 1.3.

[llvm-branch-commits] [llvm] cebd720 - Revert "[SEH][CodeGen] Add test to track CFG optimization bug for SEH (#77441)"

Author: HaohaiWen Date: 2024-01-10T09:24:52+08:00 New Revision: cebd720ab6429bbf2f8d09c37c2965782f23dbab URL: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/cebd720ab6429bbf2f8d09c37c2965782f23dbab DIFF: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/cebd720ab6429bbf2f8d09c37c2965782f23dbab.diff LOG

[llvm-branch-commits] [llvm] cebd720 - Revert "[SEH][CodeGen] Add test to track CFG optimization bug for SEH (#77441)"

Author: HaohaiWen Date: 2024-01-10T09:24:52+08:00 New Revision: cebd720ab6429bbf2f8d09c37c2965782f23dbab URL: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/cebd720ab6429bbf2f8d09c37c2965782f23dbab DIFF: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/cebd720ab6429bbf2f8d09c37c2965782f23dbab.diff LOG

[llvm-branch-commits] [libcxx] [libc++][modules] Adds module testing. (PR #76246)

@@ -131,13 +138,65 @@ def parseScript(test, preamble): script += preamble script += scriptInTest +has_std_module = False +has_std_compat_module = False +for module in modules: +if module == "std": +has_std_module = True +elif mod