pcc wrote:
> wow this is very messy, feels like there should be a better way to do this on
> the CMake side
Yeah, or maybe even in the tests themselves, maybe they should be using weak
symbols for the builtins and return unsupported if the symbol is undefined at
runtime.
https://github.com/l
https://github.com/aeubanks approved this pull request.
wow this is very messy, feels like there should be a better way to do this on
the CMake side
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/134482
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-comm
https://github.com/pcc updated https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/134482
>From bc8dda56bcfadc6d7312b53313159a978d71f4fb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Peter Collingbourne
Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2025 22:10:52 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] Remove unnecessary code
Created using spr 1.3.6-beta.1
---
...
https://github.com/pcc updated https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/134482
>From bc8dda56bcfadc6d7312b53313159a978d71f4fb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Peter Collingbourne
Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2025 22:10:52 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] Remove unnecessary code
Created using spr 1.3.6-beta.1
---
...
https://github.com/pcc updated https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/134482
>From bc8dda56bcfadc6d7312b53313159a978d71f4fb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Peter Collingbourne
Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2025 22:10:52 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] Remove unnecessary code
Created using spr 1.3.6-beta.1
---
...