[llvm-branch-commits] [compiler-rt] [tsan] Fallback to top frame (PR #77145)

2024-01-05 Thread Thurston Dang via llvm-branch-commits
thurstond wrote: > Probably it's not important, as it should not happen, but if all frames are > internal we should pick top, not the bottom frame. If we encounter a case that "should not happen", wouldn't it be better to fail/assert? https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77145 __

[llvm-branch-commits] [compiler-rt] [tsan] Fallback to top frame (PR #77145)

2024-01-05 Thread via llvm-branch-commits
llvmbot wrote: @llvm/pr-subscribers-compiler-rt-sanitizer Author: Vitaly Buka (vitalybuka) Changes Probably it's not important, as it should not happen, but if all frames are internal we should pick top, not the bottom frame. --- Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77145

[llvm-branch-commits] [compiler-rt] [tsan] Fallback to top frame (PR #77145)

2024-01-05 Thread Vitaly Buka via llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/vitalybuka created https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77145 Probably it's not important, as it should not happen, but if all frames are internal we should pick top, not the bottom frame. ___ llvm-branch-commits mailing list