nikic wrote:
Could we have block renumbering produce a map from old to new numbers, which we
can then use for straightforward analysis updates?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/103400
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@l
aengelke wrote:
[c-t-t](http://llvm-compile-time-tracker.com/compare.php?from=2db9cb5fec35a7516b0e1d123d161ace78e14be6&to=c34780d18ac411ca2363eeff1cecd08aeb1d154a&stat=instructions:u)
-0.13% stage2-O3
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/103400
_
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-backend-aarch64
@llvm/pr-subscribers-llvm-support
Author: Alexis Engelke (aengelke)
Changes
Replace the DenseMap from blocks to their innermost loop a vector
indexed by block numbers, when possible.
This requires updating the loop info when blocks are r
https://github.com/aengelke created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/103400
Replace the DenseMap from blocks to their innermost loop a vector
indexed by block numbers, when possible.
This requires updating the loop info when blocks are renumbered. This
update is currently implemented b
