[llvm-branch-commits] [InstCombine] Don't look at ConstantData users (PR #103302)

@@ -0,0 +1,576 @@ +; NOTE: Assertions have been autogenerated by utils/update_test_checks.py UTC_ARGS: --version 5 +; RUN: opt -mtriple=arm64 -passes='inline,function(sroa,jump-threading,instcombine)' -S < %s | FileCheck %s nikic wrote: Why can't this be an in

[llvm-branch-commits] [InstCombine] Don't look at ConstantData users (PR #103302)

llvmbot wrote: @llvm/pr-subscribers-llvm-transforms Author: Alexis Engelke (aengelke) Changes When looking at PHI operand for combining, only look at instructions and arguments. The loop later iteraters over Arg's users, which is not useful if Arg is a constant -- it's users are not meanin

[llvm-branch-commits] [InstCombine] Don't look at ConstantData users (PR #103302)

https://github.com/aengelke created https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/103302 When looking at PHI operand for combining, only look at instructions and arguments. The loop later iteraters over Arg's users, which is not useful if Arg is a constant -- it's users are not meaningful and might