vadorovsky wrote:
> So looks like llvm21 will have an assertion for rust if without backport.
Yes, exactly.
> Does it have problems before llvm21 say llvm20?
Yes, the same problem occurs on LLVM 20 and earlier versions as well. But given
that the Rust 1.91.0-beta is already using LLVM 21 and
vadorovsky wrote:
Thanks and sorry for not using the cherry-pick command
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/165154
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branc
vadorovsky wrote:
@eddyz87 @c-rhodes Not sure if that's the correct way of proposing backports,
but I don't have rights to add items to
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/milestone/27. I would appreciate your
review!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/165154
_
https://github.com/vadorovsky edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/165154
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/vadorovsky edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/165154
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/vadorovsky created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/165154
Backport the following commits to 21.x branch, that fix the BTF debug info
generation for IR produced by Rust frontend:
* 7ae7a5ad51f32118161ee0aaa13b11368aa5d29b
* ad582e383369fc32fffb016be68b1ba7812f2325 -
