https://github.com/williamweixiao approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/129781
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/llvmbot milestoned
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/133153
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-libcxx
Author: None (llvmbot)
Changes
Backport 51bceb46f8eeb7c3d060387be315ca41855933c2
Requested by: @mstorsjo
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/133153.diff
1 Files Affected:
- (modified) libcxx/test/tools/clang_tidy_checks/C
androm3da wrote:
@iajbar can you review the cherry-pick of this floating point comparison fix?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/131270
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailm
androm3da wrote:
@iajbar can you review this cherry-pick for the compiler driver?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/130678
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/
https://github.com/mizvekov updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/133190
>From bb164f3a8c86282ff6cb317ff10df21b33b11520 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Matheus Izvekov
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2025 18:38:34 -0300
Subject: [PATCH] [clang] support pack expansions for trailing requires clauses
mizvekov wrote:
Actually the current users of the implicit conversion are not good at all, will
fix them instead.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/133190
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.ll
ChuanqiXu9 wrote:
This is a simple fix to a problem with a (relatively) long history. I think it
is good to backport this.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/133198
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https:/
https://github.com/mtrofin edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/133147
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/igogo-x86 approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/132031
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
zyn0217 wrote:
Looks like there are some dependencies on the implicit bool conversion. So feel
free to drop the explicit specifier ;)
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/133190
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.
https://github.com/tstellar approved this pull request.
Thank you. We could probably do this for some other directories, but this is a
good first start.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/133185
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch
https://github.com/atrosinenko updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/132540
>From 774ecf8d94cb7acff292af5b16655a62b8b23201 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Anatoly Trosinenko
Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2025 20:15:07 +0300
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [BOLT] Gadget scanner: Detect address materializati
https://github.com/boomanaiden154 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/132642
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
@@ -0,0 +1,228 @@
+// RUN: %clang %cflags -march=armv8.3-a %s -o %t.exe
+// RUN: llvm-bolt-binary-analysis --scanners=pauth %t.exe 2>&1 | FileCheck %s
+
+// Test various patterns that should or should not be considered safe
+// materialization of PC-relative addresses.
+//
+// Not
https://github.com/boomanaiden154 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/132642
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/boomanaiden154 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/132642
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
@@ -13,7 +12,8 @@ body: |
; CHECK: liveins: $sgpr0
; CHECK-NEXT: {{ $}}
; CHECK-NEXT: [[COPY:%[0-9]+]]:sgpr(s32) = COPY $sgpr0
-; CHECK-NEXT: [[ANYEXT:%[0-9]+]]:sgpr(s64) = G_ANYEXT [[COPY]](s32)
+; CHECK-NEXT: [[DEF:%[0-9]+]]:sgpr(s32) = G_IMPLICIT_DEF
+
@@ -0,0 +1,131 @@
+target datalayout =
"e-m:e-p270:32:32-p271:32:32-p272:64:64-i64:64-i128:128-f80:128-n8:16:32:64-S128"
+target triple = "x86_64-grtev4-linux-gnu"
+
+; Tests that constant pool hotness is aggregated across the module. The
mingmingl-llvm wrote:
G
llvmbot wrote:
@mordante What do you think about merging this PR to the release branch?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/133153
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/list
https://github.com/llvmbot created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/133153
Backport 51bceb46f8eeb7c3d060387be315ca41855933c2
Requested by: @mstorsjo
>From b6cc484e46b8d837b5256a994c73e1530bbb807d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Martin=20Storsj=C3=B6?=
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2025
https://github.com/mtrofin created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/133146
None
>From bbe97a86d8cc94b484420db54f735dac8bc818cf Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Mircea Trofin
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2025 10:10:43 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] [ctxprof][nfc] Move 2 implementation functions up in
`Ctx
https://github.com/mingmingl-llvm updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/129781
>From 072c44f0f9272682480cc2837196a906bd694276 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: mingmingl
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2025 14:41:56 -0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] [CodeGen][StaticDataSplitter]Support constant pool
parti
@@ -0,0 +1,141 @@
+; RUN: llc -mtriple=aarch64 -enable-split-machine-functions \
+; RUN: -partition-static-data-sections=true -function-sections=true \
+; RUN: -unique-section-names=false \
+; RUN: %s -o - 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --dump-input=always
+
+; Repeat the RUN com
@@ -0,0 +1,141 @@
+; RUN: llc -mtriple=aarch64 -enable-split-machine-functions \
mingmingl-llvm wrote:
Currently in the target pass configuration, the data partitioning pass is added
inside `TM->Options.EnableMachineFunctionSplitter ||
EnableMachineFunctionSpli
@@ -0,0 +1,141 @@
+; RUN: llc -mtriple=aarch64 -enable-split-machine-functions \
+; RUN: -partition-static-data-sections=true -function-sections=true \
+; RUN: -unique-section-names=false \
+; RUN: %s -o - 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --dump-input=always
+
+; Repeat the RUN com
https://github.com/mingmingl-llvm updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/129781
>From 072c44f0f9272682480cc2837196a906bd694276 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: mingmingl
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2025 14:41:56 -0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [CodeGen][StaticDataSplitter]Support constant pool
parti
@@ -17,6 +17,8 @@
// UBSan does not install a malloc zone.
// XFAIL: ubsan
//
+// Curently fails on darwin/lsan rdar://145873843
jroelofs wrote:
Radar links are appropriate for commit messages, but the community no longer
accepts them in comments.
https://gi
github-actions[bot] wrote:
:warning: C/C++ code formatter, clang-format found issues in your code.
:warning:
You can test this locally with the following command:
``bash
git-clang-format --diff bbe97a86d8cc94b484420db54f735dac8bc818cf
7182baeef88e3d9448062118fd8af808a17fbcd9 --e
https://github.com/mtrofin created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/133147
None
>From 7182baeef88e3d9448062118fd8af808a17fbcd9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Mircea Trofin
Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2025 12:01:10 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] RootAutodetect
---
compiler-rt/lib/ctx_profile/CMakeList
https://github.com/mtrofin ready_for_review
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/133146
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
mtrofin wrote:
> [!WARNING]
> This pull request is not mergeable via GitHub because a downstack PR is
> open. Once all requirements are satisfied, merge this PR as a stack href="https://app.graphite.dev/github/pr/llvm/llvm-project/133147?utm_source=stack-comment-downstack-mergeability-warning";
https://github.com/boomanaiden154 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/132642
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/boomanaiden154 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/132642
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/boomanaiden154 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/132642
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
@@ -265,14 +265,14 @@ int k9 = f9(V9());
// CHECK-ELIDE-TREE: S9<
// CHECK-ELIDE-TREE: [2 * ...],
// CHECK-ELIDE-TREE: U9<
-// CHECK-ELIDE-TREE: [(no qualifiers) != const] double>>
shafik wrote:
It is not obvious why this changed, can you expla
@@ -0,0 +1,228 @@
+// RUN: %clang %cflags -march=armv8.3-a %s -o %t.exe
+// RUN: llvm-bolt-binary-analysis --scanners=pauth %t.exe 2>&1 | FileCheck %s
+
+// Test various patterns that should or should not be considered safe
+// materialization of PC-relative addresses.
+//
+// Not
https://github.com/NickGuy-Arm edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/133090
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
NickGuy-Arm wrote:
Could you pre-commit this test, so we can see how the output changes before and
after the changes in LoopVectorize.cpp
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/133090
___
llvm-branch-commits maili
https://github.com/nhaehnle commented:
I didn't look at everything, I just went through some of the tests.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/132383
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/c
@@ -215,8 +205,7 @@ body: |
; CHECK: liveins: $sgpr0
; CHECK-NEXT: {{ $}}
; CHECK-NEXT: [[COPY:%[0-9]+]]:sgpr(s32) = COPY $sgpr0
-; CHECK-NEXT: [[TRUNC:%[0-9]+]]:sgpr(s1) = G_TRUNC [[COPY]](s32)
-; CHECK-NEXT: [[ANYEXT:%[0-9]+]]:sgpr(s64) = G_ANYEXT [[TRUNC
https://github.com/nhaehnle edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/132383
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
@@ -269,10 +266,12 @@ body: |
; CHECK: liveins: $vgpr0
; CHECK-NEXT: {{ $}}
; CHECK-NEXT: [[COPY:%[0-9]+]]:vgpr(s32) = COPY $vgpr0
-; CHECK-NEXT: [[TRUNC:%[0-9]+]]:vgpr(s1) = G_TRUNC [[COPY]](s32)
-; CHECK-NEXT: [[ANYEXT:%[0-9]+]]:vgpr(s32) = G_ANYEXT [[TRU
@@ -233,8 +222,13 @@ body: |
; CHECK: liveins: $vgpr0
; CHECK-NEXT: {{ $}}
; CHECK-NEXT: [[COPY:%[0-9]+]]:vgpr(s32) = COPY $vgpr0
-; CHECK-NEXT: [[TRUNC:%[0-9]+]]:vgpr(s1) = G_TRUNC [[COPY]](s32)
-; CHECK-NEXT: [[ANYEXT:%[0-9]+]]:vgpr(s16) = G_ANYEXT [[TRUN
@@ -251,8 +245,11 @@ body: |
; CHECK: liveins: $vgpr0
; CHECK-NEXT: {{ $}}
; CHECK-NEXT: [[COPY:%[0-9]+]]:vgpr(s32) = COPY $vgpr0
-; CHECK-NEXT: [[TRUNC:%[0-9]+]]:vgpr(s1) = G_TRUNC [[COPY]](s32)
-; CHECK-NEXT: [[ANYEXT:%[0-9]+]]:vgpr(s32) = G_ANYEXT [[TRUN
@@ -160,8 +154,7 @@ body: |
; CHECK-NEXT: [[C:%[0-9]+]]:vgpr(s32) = G_CONSTANT i32 1
; CHECK-NEXT: [[C1:%[0-9]+]]:vgpr(s32) = G_CONSTANT i32 0
; CHECK-NEXT: [[SELECT:%[0-9]+]]:vgpr(s32) = G_SELECT [[ICMP]](s1), [[C]],
[[C1]]
-; CHECK-NEXT: [[DEF:%[0-9]+]]:vgpr(
@@ -0,0 +1,228 @@
+// RUN: %clang %cflags -march=armv8.3-a %s -o %t.exe
+// RUN: llvm-bolt-binary-analysis --scanners=pauth %t.exe 2>&1 | FileCheck %s
+
+// Test various patterns that should or should not be considered safe
+// materialization of PC-relative addresses.
+//
+// Not
https://github.com/atrosinenko updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/132540
>From 774ecf8d94cb7acff292af5b16655a62b8b23201 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Anatoly Trosinenko
Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2025 20:15:07 +0300
Subject: [PATCH] [BOLT] Gadget scanner: Detect address materialization a
https://github.com/atrosinenko updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/132540
>From 774ecf8d94cb7acff292af5b16655a62b8b23201 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Anatoly Trosinenko
Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2025 20:15:07 +0300
Subject: [PATCH] [BOLT] Gadget scanner: Detect address materialization a
@@ -0,0 +1,228 @@
+// RUN: %clang %cflags -march=armv8.3-a %s -o %t.exe
+// RUN: llvm-bolt-binary-analysis --scanners=pauth %t.exe 2>&1 | FileCheck %s
+
+// Test various patterns that should or should not be considered safe
+// materialization of PC-relative addresses.
+//
+// Not
https://github.com/atrosinenko updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/132540
>From 53f6310e26cb02a18d99a9350ff8162ea0ed22b6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Anatoly Trosinenko
Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2025 20:15:07 +0300
Subject: [PATCH] [BOLT] Gadget scanner: Detect address materialization a
https://github.com/atrosinenko updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/132540
>From 53f6310e26cb02a18d99a9350ff8162ea0ed22b6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Anatoly Trosinenko
Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2025 20:15:07 +0300
Subject: [PATCH] [BOLT] Gadget scanner: Detect address materialization a
Author: Karlo Basioli
Date: 2025-03-26T15:12:55Z
New Revision: cf9a10d4665d71acd86de0b98cbaf25dd9dd03cc
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/cf9a10d4665d71acd86de0b98cbaf25dd9dd03cc
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/cf9a10d4665d71acd86de0b98cbaf25dd9dd03cc.diff
LOG:
Author: David Spickett
Date: 2025-03-26T15:03:58Z
New Revision: 1840957286329da64742ea50a9e28fd79e7baa56
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/1840957286329da64742ea50a9e28fd79e7baa56
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/1840957286329da64742ea50a9e28fd79e7baa56.diff
LOG
ldionne wrote:
The commit message should make it clear that this is a no-op on Clang.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/133010
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://li
@@ -5026,10 +5026,23 @@ calculateRegisterUsage(VPlan &Plan,
ArrayRef VFs,
// even in the scalar case.
RegUsage[ClassID] += 1;
} else {
+// The output from scaled phis and scaled reductions actually have
+// fewer lanes
@@ -64,25 +64,13 @@ Visibility Macros
ABI, we should create a new _LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI_AFTER_XXX macro, and we can
ldionne wrote:
Not attached to this line: you should update the `Overview` at the beginning of
this file to reflect the latest state of things.
https://github.com/ldionne requested changes to this pull request.
I am fine with the spirit of this patch. I think it needs a release note though
since we're making library-wide changes. We don't think those changes are going
to affect anyone, but I think it's a nice courtesy to give our users
https://github.com/ldionne edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/133010
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-libcxx
Author: Nikolas Klauser (philnik777)
Changes
Since almost all of our symbols are explicitly annotated with visibility
macros, this makes almost no difference to the actual visibility of symbols.
Not having to annotate types at the cost of having
https://github.com/NickGuy-Arm commented:
Looks generally good to me so far, with a few nitpicks.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/133090
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/ma
https://github.com/philnik777 ready_for_review
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/133010
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
@@ -5026,10 +5026,23 @@ calculateRegisterUsage(VPlan &Plan,
ArrayRef VFs,
// even in the scalar case.
RegUsage[ClassID] += 1;
} else {
+// The output from scaled phis and scaled reductions actually have
+// fewer lanes
@@ -2031,17 +2033,19 @@ class VPReductionPHIRecipe : public VPHeaderPHIRecipe,
/// scalar value.
class VPPartialReductionRecipe : public VPSingleDefRecipe {
unsigned Opcode;
+ unsigned ScaleFactor;
NickGuy-Arm wrote:
Nit: Could this be `VFScaleFactor` to ma
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-vectorizers
Author: Sam Tebbs (SamTebbs33)
Changes
This PR accounts for scaled reductions in `calculateRegisterUsage` to reflect
the fact that the number of lanes in their output is smaller than the VF.
---
Patch is 56.56 KiB, truncated to 20.00 KiB b
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-llvm-transforms
Author: Sam Tebbs (SamTebbs33)
Changes
This PR accounts for scaled reductions in `calculateRegisterUsage` to reflect
the fact that the number of lanes in their output is smaller than the VF.
---
Patch is 56.56 KiB, truncated to 20.00 K
https://github.com/SamTebbs33 created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/133090
This PR accounts for scaled reductions in `calculateRegisterUsage` to reflect
the fact that the number of lanes in their output is smaller than the VF.
>From 6193c2c846710472c7e604ef33a15cda18771328 Mon Sep
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-backend-x86
Author: None (llvmbot)
Changes
Backport 66f158d91803875de63d8f2a437ce8ecb22c4141
Requested by: @dianqk
---
Patch is 29.24 KiB, truncated to 20.00 KiB below, full version:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/133082.diff
4 Files Aff
llvmbot wrote:
@arsenm What do you think about merging this PR to the release branch?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/133082
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listin
https://github.com/llvmbot created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/133082
Backport 66f158d91803875de63d8f2a437ce8ecb22c4141
Requested by: @dianqk
>From 8241e69958028a64b9246986ee97b2d73ac48df4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: dianqk
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2025 21:27:43 +0800
Subject: [PATC
https://github.com/llvmbot milestoned
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/133082
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/atrosinenko updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/132540
>From 72e3de5990635d183b3b39cc55ad4dab5e104a29 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Anatoly Trosinenko
Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2025 20:15:07 +0300
Subject: [PATCH] [BOLT] Gadget scanner: Detect address materialization a
https://github.com/atrosinenko updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/132540
>From 72e3de5990635d183b3b39cc55ad4dab5e104a29 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Anatoly Trosinenko
Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2025 20:15:07 +0300
Subject: [PATCH] [BOLT] Gadget scanner: Detect address materialization a
https://github.com/arsenm approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/130064
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/hekota created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/132453
None
>From 47b41c88a60a7f376070b9ff779ec955eebf523a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Helena Kotas
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2025 17:20:51 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [HLSL] Create default resource constructor with
Builtin
https://github.com/Pierre-vh updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/131624
>From f4c801437460aef9b9c2e5f49d1e98ec90fadb16 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: pvanhout
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2025 13:54:59 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] [GlobalISel] Combine redundant sext_inreg
---
.../llvm/CodeGe
mstorsjo wrote:
> @mstorsjo (or anyone else). If you would like to add a note about this fix in
> the release notes (completely optional). Please reply to this comment with a
> one or two sentence description of the fix. When you are done, please add the
> release:note label to this PR.
We co
https://github.com/optimisan updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/130064
>From 3dcdf09b2a4635da32ff99208ddad0c27bdc621e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Akshat Oke
Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2025 06:07:23 +
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [AMDGPU][NPM] Port AMDGPUSetWavePriority to NPM
---
llvm/lib
78 matches
Mail list logo