llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-backend-aarch64
Author: Matt Arsenault (arsenm)
Changes
Use LLSC or cmpxchg in the same cases as for the unsupported
integer operations. This required some fixups to the LLSC
implementatation to deal with the fp128 case.
---
Patch is 88.31 KiB, truncat
https://github.com/arsenm ready_for_review
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/103702
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
arsenm wrote:
> [!WARNING]
> This pull request is not mergeable via GitHub because a downstack PR is
> open. Once all requirements are satisfied, merge this PR as a stack href="https://app.graphite.dev/github/pr/llvm/llvm-project/103702?utm_source=stack-comment-downstack-mergeability-warning";
https://github.com/arsenm created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/103702
Use LLSC or cmpxchg in the same cases as for the unsupported
integer operations. This required some fixups to the LLSC
implementatation to deal with the fp128 case.
>From ce17dc93b96d8b71d81b7c283dbf8f46538581a0
https://github.com/wlei-llvm commented:
Thanks for the improvement, I will try it on llvm-profgen to get some numbers.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102789
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://list
@@ -276,17 +278,35 @@ class MCPseudoProbeInlineTree
};
// inline tree node for the decoded pseudo probe
-class MCDecodedPseudoProbeInlineTree
-: public MCPseudoProbeInlineTreeBase {
+class MCDecodedPseudoProbeInlineTree {
wlei-llvm wrote:
Now that this cl
@@ -218,9 +220,7 @@ void PseudoProbeRewriter::updatePseudoProbes() {
}
while (CallOutputAddress != CallOutputAddresses.second) {
- AP.second.push_back(*Probe);
- AP.second.back().setAddress(CallOutputAddress->second);
- Probe->getInli
https://github.com/wlei-llvm edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102789
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
ChuanqiXu9 wrote:
> > How about waiting 2 weeks to see if there is any regression reports? If no,
> > I'll try to ping you again to merge this.
>
> That seems counter-intuitive. Yes there are projects using LLVM main, but it
> would appear much more likely to me to get regression reports from
h-vetinari wrote:
> How about waiting 2 weeks to see if there is any regression reports? If no,
> I'll try to ping you again to merge this.
That seems counter-intuitive. Yes there are projects using LLVM main, but it
would appear much more likely to me to get regression reports from the releas
Author: Fangrui Song
Date: 2024-08-13T18:58:45-07:00
New Revision: b8095578f0a12653958aa64c0b071e34879a6991
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/b8095578f0a12653958aa64c0b071e34879a6991
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/b8095578f0a12653958aa64c0b071e34879a6991.diff
https://github.com/androm3da updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/103003
>From 2188e4b6b6dc257436f6d9086fe0b7205f8d512a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Brian Cain
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2024 20:07:08 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] [libc++] Use a different smart ptr type alias (#102089)
The `_SP
https://github.com/tuliom milestoned
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/103491
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/tuliom created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/103491
Start __kmp_invoke_microtask with PACBTI in order to identify the function as a
valid branch target. Before returning, SP is authenticated.
Also add the BTI and PAC markers to z_Linux_asm.S.
With this patch, lib
https://github.com/rymiel approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/103403
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/hekota approved this pull request.
LGTM!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/100699
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
@@ -0,0 +1,126 @@
+; RUN: opt -S -disable-output -passes="print" < %s 2>&1 |
FileCheck %s
+
+@G = external constant <4 x float>, align 4
+
+define void @test_typedbuffer() {
+ ; RWBuffer Buf : register(u5, space3)
+ %typed0 = call target("dx.TypedBuffer", <4 x float>, 1, 0, 0)
https://github.com/hekota edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/100699
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
nikic wrote:
Could we have block renumbering produce a map from old to new numbers, which we
can then use for straightforward analysis updates?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/103400
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@l
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-format
Author: None (llvmbot)
Changes
Backport ee2359968fa307ef45254c816e14df33374168cd
Requested by: @owenca
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/103403.diff
2 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang/lib/Format/UnwrappedLinePar
llvmbot wrote:
@rymiel What do you think about merging this PR to the release branch?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/103403
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listin
https://github.com/llvmbot milestoned
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/103403
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/llvmbot created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/103403
Backport ee2359968fa307ef45254c816e14df33374168cd
Requested by: @owenca
>From 62e19b39c71e79653918681acb5495d7e2598010 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Owen Pan
Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2024 12:39:33 -0700
Subject: [PA
aengelke wrote:
[c-t-t](http://llvm-compile-time-tracker.com/compare.php?from=2db9cb5fec35a7516b0e1d123d161ace78e14be6&to=c34780d18ac411ca2363eeff1cecd08aeb1d154a&stat=instructions:u)
-0.13% stage2-O3
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/103400
_
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-backend-aarch64
@llvm/pr-subscribers-llvm-support
Author: Alexis Engelke (aengelke)
Changes
Replace the DenseMap from blocks to their innermost loop a vector
indexed by block numbers, when possible.
This requires updating the loop info when blocks are r
https://github.com/aengelke created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/103400
Replace the DenseMap from blocks to their innermost loop a vector
indexed by block numbers, when possible.
This requires updating the loop info when blocks are renumbered. This
update is currently implemented b
https://github.com/aengelke updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/103302
>From 6a2ac00a8424a4402475e2b7972bfb01330c3bf8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Alexis Engelke
Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2024 16:10:38 +
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] Only run instcombine in test case
Created using spr 1.3.5
https://github.com/aengelke updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/103302
>From 6a2ac00a8424a4402475e2b7972bfb01330c3bf8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Alexis Engelke
Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2024 16:10:38 +
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] Only run instcombine in test case
Created using spr 1.3.5
syzaara wrote:
@tru Hi Tobias, can you please help to merge in this PR? Thanks!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/103301
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llv
https://github.com/fhahn approved this pull request.
LGTM, thanks for the fix
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/103302
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-
https://github.com/nikic approved this pull request.
LGTM
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/103302
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/efriedma-quic approved this pull request.
LGTM
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/103048
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commi
https://github.com/ldionne approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/103003
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/mandlebug approved this pull request.
LGTM.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/103301
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
aengelke wrote:
Done. Fun fact, llvm-reduce crashed on the input due to this bug.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/103302
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.
https://github.com/aengelke updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/103302
>From 6a2ac00a8424a4402475e2b7972bfb01330c3bf8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Alexis Engelke
Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2024 16:10:38 +
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] Only run instcombine in test case
Created using spr 1.3.5
@@ -499,11 +652,78 @@ struct _LIBCPP_TEMPLATE_VIS __format_to_n_buffer final
_LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI auto __make_output_iterator() { return
this->__output_.__make_output_iterator(); }
_LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI format_to_n_result<_OutIt> __result() && {
-this->__output_.__fl
@@ -452,9 +452,9 @@ format_to(_OutIt __out_it, wformat_string<_Args...> __fmt,
_Args&&... __args) {
// fires too eagerly, see http://llvm.org/PR61563.
template
[[nodiscard]] _LIBCPP_ALWAYS_INLINE inline _LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI string
vformat(string_view __fmt, format_args __ar
@@ -499,11 +652,78 @@ struct _LIBCPP_TEMPLATE_VIS __format_to_n_buffer final
_LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI auto __make_output_iterator() { return
this->__output_.__make_output_iterator(); }
_LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI format_to_n_result<_OutIt> __result() && {
-this->__output_.__fl
@@ -58,23 +59,156 @@ namespace __format {
/// This helper is used together with the @ref back_insert_iterator to offer
/// type-erasure for the formatting functions. This reduces the number to
/// template instantiations.
+///
+/// The design of the class is being changed to im
@@ -58,23 +59,156 @@ namespace __format {
/// This helper is used together with the @ref back_insert_iterator to offer
/// type-erasure for the formatting functions. This reduces the number to
/// template instantiations.
+///
+/// The design of the class is being changed to im
@@ -58,23 +59,156 @@ namespace __format {
/// This helper is used together with the @ref back_insert_iterator to offer
/// type-erasure for the formatting functions. This reduces the number to
/// template instantiations.
+///
+/// The design of the class is being changed to im
@@ -58,23 +59,156 @@ namespace __format {
/// This helper is used together with the @ref back_insert_iterator to offer
/// type-erasure for the formatting functions. This reduces the number to
/// template instantiations.
+///
+/// The design of the class is being changed to im
@@ -58,23 +59,156 @@ namespace __format {
/// This helper is used together with the @ref back_insert_iterator to offer
/// type-erasure for the formatting functions. This reduces the number to
/// template instantiations.
+///
+/// The design of the class is being changed to im
@@ -499,11 +652,78 @@ struct _LIBCPP_TEMPLATE_VIS __format_to_n_buffer final
_LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI auto __make_output_iterator() { return
this->__output_.__make_output_iterator(); }
_LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI format_to_n_result<_OutIt> __result() && {
-this->__output_.__fl
@@ -58,23 +59,156 @@ namespace __format {
/// This helper is used together with the @ref back_insert_iterator to offer
/// type-erasure for the formatting functions. This reduces the number to
/// template instantiations.
+///
+/// The design of the class is being changed to im
@@ -58,23 +59,156 @@ namespace __format {
/// This helper is used together with the @ref back_insert_iterator to offer
/// type-erasure for the formatting functions. This reduces the number to
/// template instantiations.
+///
+/// The design of the class is being changed to im
https://github.com/ldionne requested changes to this pull request.
As discussed, I think we should behave more like `std::vector` and not assume
that elements between `[size(), capacity())` are already initialized. IMO this
is a simpler mental model that is consistent with `std::vector` and I d
@@ -58,23 +59,156 @@ namespace __format {
/// This helper is used together with the @ref back_insert_iterator to offer
/// type-erasure for the formatting functions. This reduces the number to
/// template instantiations.
+///
+/// The design of the class is being changed to im
https://github.com/ldionne edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/101817
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/amy-kwan updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/101226
>From a5d47e331e3bd754db092c194a5ca5b25ff99011 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Amy Kwan
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2024 12:55:34 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] [PowerPC][GlobalMerge] Enable GlobalMerge by default on AIX
This pa
https://github.com/topperc approved this pull request.
LGTM
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/101506
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
nikic wrote:
This test still doesn't look anything approaching minimal. Please run it
through llvm-reduce.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/103302
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lis
@@ -0,0 +1,918 @@
+; NOTE: Assertions have been autogenerated by utils/update_test_checks.py
UTC_ARGS: --version 5
+; RUN: opt -mtriple=arm64 -S < %s -passes=instcombine | FileCheck %s
nikic wrote:
Triple should not be needed.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-proje
@@ -0,0 +1,576 @@
+; NOTE: Assertions have been autogenerated by utils/update_test_checks.py
UTC_ARGS: --version 5
+; RUN: opt -mtriple=arm64
-passes='inline,function(sroa,jump-threading,instcombine)' -S < %s
| FileCheck %s
aengelke wrote:
True, changed
https
https://github.com/aengelke updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/103302
>From 6a2ac00a8424a4402475e2b7972bfb01330c3bf8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Alexis Engelke
Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2024 16:10:38 +
Subject: [PATCH] Only run instcombine in test case
Created using spr 1.3.5-bog
@@ -0,0 +1,576 @@
+; NOTE: Assertions have been autogenerated by utils/update_test_checks.py
UTC_ARGS: --version 5
+; RUN: opt -mtriple=arm64
-passes='inline,function(sroa,jump-threading,instcombine)' -S < %s
| FileCheck %s
nikic wrote:
Why can't this be an in
https://github.com/ldionne edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/101817
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
@@ -64,32 +64,14 @@ struct _LIBCPP_TEMPLATE_VIS formatter : public __formatte
template
_LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI typename _FormatContext::iterator format(const _CharT*
__str, _FormatContext& __ctx) const {
_LIBCPP_ASSERT_INTERNAL(__str, "The basic_format_arg constructor s
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-llvm-transforms
Author: Alexis Engelke (aengelke)
Changes
When looking at PHI operand for combining, only look at instructions and
arguments. The loop later iteraters over Arg's users, which is not
useful if Arg is a constant -- it's users are not meanin
https://github.com/ldionne approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/101805
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
@@ -64,32 +64,14 @@ struct _LIBCPP_TEMPLATE_VIS formatter : public __formatte
template
_LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI typename _FormatContext::iterator format(const _CharT*
__str, _FormatContext& __ctx) const {
_LIBCPP_ASSERT_INTERNAL(__str, "The basic_format_arg constructor s
https://github.com/aengelke created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/103302
When looking at PHI operand for combining, only look at instructions and
arguments. The loop later iteraters over Arg's users, which is not
useful if Arg is a constant -- it's users are not meaningful and might
https://github.com/ldionne edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/101805
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/mordante edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/101805
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-backend-powerpc
Author: None (llvmbot)
Changes
Backport d07f106e512c08455b76cc1889ee48318e73c810
Requested by: @syzaara
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/103301.diff
2 Files Affected:
- (modified) llvm/lib/Target/PowerPC/PPCFr
llvmbot wrote:
@mandlebug What do you think about merging this PR to the release branch?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/103301
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/lis
https://github.com/llvmbot milestoned
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/103301
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/llvmbot created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/103301
Backport d07f106e512c08455b76cc1889ee48318e73c810
Requested by: @syzaara
>From 84853313eed6b778285f6a1329837f2da0a5ff10 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Zaara Syeda
Date: Wed, 7 Aug 2024 09:59:45 -0400
Subject:
https://github.com/arsenm ready_for_review
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/103211
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
arsenm wrote:
> [!WARNING]
> This pull request is not mergeable via GitHub because a downstack PR is
> open. Once all requirements are satisfied, merge this PR as a stack href="https://app.graphite.dev/github/pr/llvm/llvm-project/103211?utm_source=stack-comment-downstack-mergeability-warning";
https://github.com/arsenm created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/103211
The expansion for cmpxchg was trying to tidy up extractvalue users
to directly use the lowered pieces, and then erasing the now dead
extractvalues. This was making an assumption about the iteration
order did not d
@@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
; NOTE: Assertions have been autogenerated by utils/update_test_checks.py
-; RUN: opt < %s -passes='lower-switch,fix-irreducible' -S | FileCheck %s
+; RUN: opt < %s -lowerswitch -fix-irreducible --verify-loop-info -S |
FileCheck %s
+; RUN: opt < %s -passes="lower
@@ -140,53 +141,43 @@ static void restoreSSA(const DominatorTree &DT, const
Loop *L,
}
}
+static bool isExitBlock(Loop *L, BasicBlock *Succ, LoopInfo &LI) {
+ Loop *SL = LI.getLoopFor(Succ);
+ if (SL == L || L->contains(SL))
+return false;
+ return true;
@@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
; NOTE: Assertions have been autogenerated by utils/update_test_checks.py
-; RUN: opt < %s -passes='lower-switch,fix-irreducible' -S | FileCheck %s
+; RUN: opt < %s -lowerswitch -fix-irreducible --verify-loop-info -S |
FileCheck %s
arsenm wrote:
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-llvm-transforms
Author: Matt Arsenault (arsenm)
Changes
This was close to manually written full checks, and was missing
a change in a future commit.
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/103064.diff
1 Files Affected:
- (modified) l
arsenm wrote:
> [!WARNING]
> This pull request is not mergeable via GitHub because a downstack PR is
> open. Once all requirements are satisfied, merge this PR as a stack href="https://app.graphite.dev/github/pr/llvm/llvm-project/103064?utm_source=stack-comment-downstack-mergeability-warning";
https://github.com/arsenm ready_for_review
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/103064
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/arsenm created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/103064
This was close to manually written full checks, and was missing
a change in a future commit.
>From b35e514f602290b5b3b5f85f1f2237f795c1e472 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Matt Arsenault
Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2024 14
https://github.com/AaronBallman approved this pull request.
LGTM
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102514
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commit
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-backend-aarch64
Author: None (llvmbot)
Changes
Backport d550ada5ab6cd6e49de71ac4c9aa27ced4c11de0
Requested by: @cjacek
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/103048.diff
2 Files Affected:
- (modified) llvm/lib/Target/AArch64/AArch6
https://github.com/llvmbot created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/103048
Backport d550ada5ab6cd6e49de71ac4c9aa27ced4c11de0
Requested by: @cjacek
>From f1e58884bfc55c3ec83f3f882a4219bf48059fdc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jacek Caban
Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2024 13:39:42 +0200
Subject:
llvmbot wrote:
@efriedma-quic What do you think about merging this PR to the release branch?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/103048
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman
https://github.com/llvmbot milestoned
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/103048
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/jhuber6 approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/100216
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
github-actions[bot] wrote:
@qiongsiwu (or anyone else). If you would like to add a note about this fix in
the release notes (completely optional). Please reply to this comment with a
one or two sentence description of the fix. When you are done, please add the
release:note label to this PR.
https://github.com/tru closed https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102968
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
Author: Qiongsi Wu
Date: 2024-08-13T14:04:18+02:00
New Revision: 28f2d04b3ca36faffe997fa86833e5ed83699272
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/28f2d04b3ca36faffe997fa86833e5ed83699272
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/28f2d04b3ca36faffe997fa86833e5ed83699272.diff
LO
https://github.com/tru updated https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102968
>From 28f2d04b3ca36faffe997fa86833e5ed83699272 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Qiongsi Wu <274595+qiongs...@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2024 16:00:25 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] [AIX] Revert `#pragma mc_func
@@ -0,0 +1,341 @@
+//===- ControlFlowUtils.cpp - Control Flow Utilities
---==//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Ap
@@ -0,0 +1,341 @@
+//===- ControlFlowUtils.cpp - Control Flow Utilities
---==//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Ap
@@ -0,0 +1,341 @@
+//===- ControlFlowUtils.cpp - Control Flow Utilities
---==//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Ap
@@ -0,0 +1,341 @@
+//===- ControlFlowUtils.cpp - Control Flow Utilities
---==//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Ap
https://github.com/AaronBallman approved this pull request.
LGTM!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102968
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commi
hazzlim wrote:
> > The patch here is pretty big in size, but it seems to only affects the
> > remarks, on the other hand it doesn't seem to really fix anything and in
> > that case I feel like RC3 might be the wrong time to merge this. Is there a
> > huge upside to take this this late in the p
https://github.com/aaupov updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102789
>From ddcbb593f72ca47acaa82f9c14a7fd2c4e30903b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Amir Ayupov
Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2024 03:51:31 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] Pass CurChildIndex by value
Created using spr 1.3.4
---
llvm/incl
@@ -106,3 +135,12 @@ Error
AMDGPUCodeGenPassBuilder::addInstSelector(AddMachinePass &addPass) const {
addPass(SILowerI1CopiesPass());
return Error::success();
}
+
+bool AMDGPUCodeGenPassBuilder::isPassEnabled(const cl::opt &Opt,
arsenm wrote:
> IMO adding
@@ -443,17 +446,24 @@ bool MCPseudoProbeDecoder::buildAddress2ProbeMap(
// If the incoming node is null, all its children nodes should be disgarded.
if (Cur) {
// Switch/add to a new tree node(inlinee)
-Cur = Cur->getOrAddNode(std::make_tuple(Guid, Index));
-Cur
https://github.com/ssahasra closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/103014
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
Author: Alexis Engelke
Date: 2024-08-13T07:50:05Z
New Revision: d0b1a582fd33e8c3605c027883c6deb35757f560
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/d0b1a582fd33e8c3605c027883c6deb35757f560
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/d0b1a582fd33e8c3605c027883c6deb35757f560.diff
LOG
1 - 100 of 132 matches
Mail list logo
