On 5/31/2016 4:46 PM, Mehdi Amini via cfe-dev wrote:
> Apparently I wasn't very clear: llvm and clang (and the others projects)
> would be simple decoupled, individual git repositories. You would be able to
> check them out however you want and commit to them individually.
> There would be an ext
On 6/29/2016 10:03 AM, Renato Golin via cfe-dev wrote:
> Since the umbrella project cannot see the sub-modules' commits without
> some form of update, there are two ways to do this:
>
> P. Per push: Every push (not commit) on all other repositories will
> trigger a hook that will hit a URL on our s
On 6/30/2016 7:43 AM, Renato Golin via llvm-dev wrote:
> Given the nature of our project's repository structure, triggers in
> each repository can't just update their own sequential ID (like
> Gerrit) because we want a sequence in order for the whole project, not
> just each component. But it's cle
On 6/30/2016 5:20 PM, Robinson, Paul via cfe-dev wrote:
> We were using tags for a while in our own SVN->git conversion internally.
> (git branch is pushed to SVN and the SVN r-number used to create a tag.)
> They are convenient for some things, but each tag adds a new (if small)
> file to .git/tag
On 6/30/2016 6:18 PM, Jim Rowan via cfe-dev wrote:
>
> On Jun 30, 2016, at 2:25 PM, Robinson, Paul via llvm-dev
> mailto:llvm-...@lists.llvm.org>> wrote:
>
> (talking about lots of tags)
>
>> I don't know that it really scales well when you
>> are talking about (long term) hundreds of thousands of
