Re: [lldb-dev] [cfe-dev] [llvm-dev] GitHub anyone?

2016-06-02 Thread Scott Warren via lldb-dev
My two cents worth: our group tries very hard to avoid Git because we find it immature, hard to use, and unreliable. I know others feel differently but our vote is to stay with SVN. If distributed repositories are a priority we’d be much happier with Mercurial. skw > On Jun 2, 2016, at 11:21

Re: [lldb-dev] [llvm-dev] [cfe-dev] GitHub anyone?

2016-06-02 Thread Scott Warren via lldb-dev
> they would have to come with a technical justification. Just claiming "it is > unreliable" does not make it a reality. Of course I don't expect anyone to accept a claim because I say so. The relative merits of Git and SVN have been widely discussed for years and most interested parties have a