+1
We use git exclusively within QC, so this looks like simplification to us.
There was mention early in the thread of continuing to enforce linear history;
that’s important to our internal integration machinery. We do currently use
the git-svn-id as a key for some of our internal processes
On Jun 27, 2016, at 9:57 PM, Chris Lattner via llvm-dev
wrote:
>
> I continue to think that 3.10 is the least defensible option out there.
I agree, given that there isn’t a concurrent agreement that we want to define
and conform to a semantic versioning scheme — and that agreement not only
On Jun 30, 2016, at 2:25 PM, Robinson, Paul via llvm-dev
wrote:
(talking about lots of tags)
> I don't know that it really scales well when you
> are talking about (long term) hundreds of thousands of them.
I can say from experience that it does not scale well.After some time,
everyone w
I don’t know what you meant to imply by “residual clause” — if you meant “it’s
not particularly important”, then I suggest it is left out entirely.
Apparently at least a few of us have interpreted it to say “the committee
reserves the right to kick you out for any behaviour that violates our
