[lldb-dev] Test suite failures on Fedora Linux?

2019-03-25 Thread David Zarzycki via lldb-dev
Hello, I’m trying to build/test/run the latest lldb on the latest Red Hat Fedora, but I’m seeing four failures. Is this expected? What operating system do the LLVM build bots run? Thanks! Dave [1+3] Python script sym-linking LLDB Python API [1+2] Preparing lit tests [1+1] cd /home/dave/s/lc/cl

Re: [lldb-dev] Test suite failures on Fedora Linux?

2019-03-25 Thread David Zarzycki via lldb-dev
> On Mar 25, 2019, at 9:04 AM, Jan Kratochvil wrote: > > On Mon, 25 Mar 2019 12:05:33 +0100, David Zarzycki via lldb-dev wrote: >> I’m trying to build/test/run the latest lldb on the latest Red Hat Fedora, >> but I’m seeing four failures. Is this expected? What operating

Re: [lldb-dev] Test suite failures on Fedora Linux?

2019-03-25 Thread David Zarzycki via lldb-dev
> On Mar 25, 2019, at 12:26 PM, Jan Kratochvil > wrote: > > On Mon, 25 Mar 2019 14:11:09 +0100, David Zarzycki via lldb-dev wrote: >> 5.0.3-200.fc29.x86_64 (mockbu...@bkernel03.phx2.fedoraproject.org) (gcc >> version 8.3.1 20190223 (Red Hat 8.3.1-2) (GCC)) #1 SMP Tue

Re: [lldb-dev] Test suite failures on Fedora Linux?

2019-03-26 Thread David Zarzycki via lldb-dev
> On Mar 26, 2019, at 3:07 AM, Jan Kratochvil wrote: > > On Mon, 25 Mar 2019 19:47:36 +0100, David Zarzycki via lldb-dev wrote: >> Also, given that two of the test failures are Intel specific (the mxcsr >> register write failures), what class of hardware do you use? My work

Re: [lldb-dev] Test suite failures on Fedora Linux?

2019-03-26 Thread David Zarzycki via lldb-dev
llvm.org/pr35043, so > I'll rename the variables there and that should fix it. Not sure about > the others. > > - Raphael > > Am Mo., 25. März 2019 um 12:06 Uhr schrieb David Zarzycki via lldb-dev > : >> >> Hello, >> >> I’m trying to build/tes

Re: [lldb-dev] [cfe-dev] [Openmp-dev] Instructions for requesting GitHub commit access

2019-09-04 Thread David Zarzycki via lldb-dev
One is expected to use `git llvm push`. For more information, please see: https://llvm.org/docs/GettingStarted.html#for-developers-to-commit-changes-from-git > On Sep 3, 2019, at 7:06 PM, David Greene via cfe-dev > wrote: > > What is the expected way to do commits? Do we push directly to mas

Re: [lldb-dev] [llvm-dev] [cfe-dev] GitHub Migration Schedule and Plans

2019-10-14 Thread David Zarzycki via lldb-dev
> On Oct 14, 2019, at 9:15 PM, Renato Golin via llvm-dev > wrote: > > On Fri, 11 Oct 2019 at 00:22, Tom Stellard via llvm-dev > wrote: >> With my latest changes in https://reviews.llvm.org/D67772 it is actually >> possible >> to create a new branch with git-llvm, so we could print a disclaim

Re: [lldb-dev] [llvm-dev] [cfe-dev] How soon after the GitHub migration should committing with git-llvm become optional?

2019-10-15 Thread David Zarzycki via lldb-dev
I’d like to see it go away. For better and for worse, git is feature rich and that makes maintaining a wrapper script difficult. Personally speaking, I had to fix a git-llvm bug recently because it made flimsy assumptions about git remote names and how upstream tracking repositories work. > On

Re: [lldb-dev] [libcxx-dev] [10.0.0 Release] The release branch is open; trunk is now 11.0.0

2020-01-19 Thread David Zarzycki via lldb-dev
Hi Hans, FYI – https://reviews.llvm.org/D72980 > On Jan 15, 2020, at 9:34 AM, Hans Wennborg via libcxx-dev > wrote: > > Hello everyone, > > The release branch for LLVM 10 and its sub-projects was created from > trunk at e26a78e70857273c83aaacd4aa0edb36effe70e3, and the trunk > version was bu