Re: [lldb-dev] [3.8 Release] Release Candidate 2 source and binaries available

2016-02-05 Thread C Bergström via lldb-dev
Sorry the stupid question as this may be documented somewhere? "OpenMP run-time included in packages targeting i386 and x86_64 Linux, x86_64 FreeBSD, and Darwin." I worked on the port of llvm-OpenMP-formally-known-as-Intel to Aarch64 - can it be included there as well? (I'm not sure what's precise

Re: [lldb-dev] [cfe-dev] GitHub anyone?

2016-05-31 Thread C Bergström via lldb-dev
peanut gallery comments from a git hater (We use git for all source revision control) On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 3:31 AM, Renato Golin via cfe-dev wrote: > Folks, > > There has been some discussion on IRC about SVN hosting and the perils > of doing it ourselves. The consensus on the current discussio

Re: [lldb-dev] FYI: Landing the initial draft for an LLVM Code of Conduct

2016-06-30 Thread C Bergström via lldb-dev
So discussion has been beaten to death and based on your comments - it seems you anticipate strong support. Is any (in)formal vote planned? Will this just get enacted, "who" decided.. On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 2:55 AM, Chandler Carruth via lldb-dev < lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Hello folks, >