On 20/07/2020 23:25, Jim Ingham wrote:
> It seems like you are having to work hard in the ValueObject system because
> you don’t want to use single AST Type for the ValueObject’s type. Seems like
> it be much simpler if you could cons up a complete type in the
> ScratchASTContext, and then use
When we were first devising commands for lldb, we tried to be really
parsimonious with the one & two letter unique command strings that lldb ships
with by default. I was trying to leave us as much flexibility as possible as
we evolved, and I also wanted to make sure we weren’t taking up all the
I don't mind adding the two-letter commands, but I also don't really see
the value in being able to say `bs` instead of `b s -y`. Until either
becomes muscle memory, both require a little cognitive overhead of thinking
"breakpoint set -y" or "breakpoint source". As a user there would be more
value
> On Jul 21, 2020, at 11:13 AM, Jonas Devlieghere wrote:
>
> I don't mind adding the two-letter commands, but I also don't really see the
> value in being able to say `bs` instead of `b s -y`. Until either becomes
> muscle memory, both require a little cognitive overhead of thinking
> "break
> On Jul 21, 2020, at 9:27 AM, Pavel Labath wrote:
>
> On 20/07/2020 23:25, Jim Ingham wrote:
>> It seems like you are having to work hard in the ValueObject system because
>> you don’t want to use single AST Type for the ValueObject’s type. Seems
>> like it be much simpler if you could cons
> On Jul 21, 2020, at 10:22 AM, Jim Ingham via lldb-dev
> wrote:
>
> When we were first devising commands for lldb, we tried to be really
> parsimonious with the one & two letter unique command strings that lldb ships
> with by default. I was trying to leave us as much flexibility as possib
> On Jul 21, 2020, at 2:54 PM, Greg Clayton wrote:
>
>
>
>> On Jul 21, 2020, at 10:22 AM, Jim Ingham via lldb-dev
>> wrote:
>>
>> When we were first devising commands for lldb, we tried to be really
>> parsimonious with the one & two letter unique command strings that lldb
>> ships with
> On Jul 21, 2020, at 9:27 AM, Pavel Labath wrote:
>
> On 20/07/2020 23:25, Jim Ingham wrote:
>> It seems like you are having to work hard in the ValueObject system because
>> you don’t want to use single AST Type for the ValueObject’s type. Seems
>> like it be much simpler if you could cons
Uploaded sles12, ubuntu16:
$ cat clang+llvm-10.0.1-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-16.04.tar.xz.sha256
48b83ef827ac2c213d5b64f5ad7ed082c8bcb712b46644e0dc5045c6f462c231
clang+llvm-10.0.1-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-16.04.tar.xz
$ cat clang+llvm-10.0.1-x86_64-linux-sles12.4.tar.xz.sha256
59f35fc7967b740315ed
